Jump to content

Who should be the O's leadoff hitter?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

About that debate, it seemed to me that neither candidate displayed much faith in OBP--they were both swinging for the fences. The main difference is that one promised a big first inning from a lineup filled with free-agent boppers while the other fights to change the rules enough to encourage historically huge late-inning comebacks by journeymen and teenage prospects.

Little did the latter know that the ex-commish had Ford-Frickin' aligned the whole league against him. They even accused him of a bias toward Cuban players and fans of Dennis Martinez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Hays had a .373 OBP in limited time last year. His job to lose. At some point he will slump and we will see Alberto, Urias/Velazquez, Iglesias, Santander etc. None of these guys is a "prototypical leadoff hitter."

And a .327 career OBP in the minors.  His career high for walks in a calendar year is 25.  He basically has Adam Jones' plate discipline. 

But we don't have much else available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Hanser Alberto for leadoff.

He bat lead off in 48 games last season.  In those games he hit .349/.364/.472/.836.   That's a better AVG, OBP, SLG, and OPS than his season totals.  I feel like he'd bring more confidence and experience to this spot than Hays or Mason Williams.  Plus, I feel like Hays has (potentially) more pop and could bat a little lower in the order. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Os don't have any ideal leadoff hitters on their roster. DJ Stewart has shown the ability to take a walk, a little power, and some speed. I also think he has shown the ability to hit at the ML level as much as Austin Hays, who IMO should be lower in the lineup (like 5th or 6th). Aberto could be a good second or third hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...