Jump to content

2020 Comp Pick A (30): Jordan Westburg - SS - (JR) (Mississippi State)


Recommended Posts

They figured Cadyn Grenier will never hit, so they thought they'd try college SS again....  

 

I wanted high upside pitcher myself.... Kelley or Montgomery, or Fulton, or even taking a shot at JT Ginn...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DocJJ said:

They figured Cadyn Grenier will never hit, so they thought they'd try college SS again....  

 

I wanted high upside pitcher myself.... Kelley or Montgomery, or Fulton, or even taking a shot at JT Ginn...

They might move him to 2B, I hear they need a 2B.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, weams said:

 

Not a fan of the swing.  He's quick to the ball, but he seems to chicken wing himself a bit and I don't see a ton of extension on account of his lower half not getting through entirely.  Maybe they can work with the quick hands and build a swing out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ScGO's said:

Not a fan of the swing.  He's quick to the ball, but he seems to chicken wing himself a bit and I don't see a ton of extension on account of his lower half not getting through entirely.  Maybe they can work with the quick hands and build a swing out of him.

I'm not a fan of rebuilding swings of college kids.  It seems like, as a best case scenario, you lose a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's hoping he's better than Cadyn Grenier!!!!    

 

I think I might be better than Cadyn Grenier....

 

So much for the picking Kjerstad so we could use some underslot savings on a high upside High Schooler theory....     

 

I hope these guys make me eat crow in a few years, but if you told me we'd have Kjerstad and Westburg for our top 2 picks, I'd have thrown my computer at you....

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not a fan of rebuilding swings of college kids.  It seems like, as a best case scenario, you lose a year.

Yeah, you think that would be a good project for a toolsy HS guy, but not a 21 year old.  Maybe its a Hunter Pence type guy, ugly swing that gets results?  I'm trying to talk myself into liking this pick.  I apologize.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DocJJ said:

 

I hope these guys make me eat crow in a few years, but if you told me we'd have Kjerstad and Westburg for our top 2 picks, I'd have thrown my computer at you....

Agree with both sentiments.  I’m not hopeful though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Something tells me teams weren't lining up to draft Westburg.

He was ranked 29th so he was right around where people expected.  The Rays would have been team as they took a college SS with similar types.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...