Jump to content

The defense thread, 2020


Frobby

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

8/18, Game 23

The Jays scored the winning run when Pedro Severino couldn’t handle a one-bounce throw Chris Davis made from the seat of his pants after making a diving stop of a grounder.   It was scored an error on Davis, but to me the blame was squarely Severino’s.   I guess any bounced throw gets scored as an error on whoever threw the ball, but this was an accurate one-hopper with a true bounce, in plenty of time to get the runner, made while Davis was literally sitting on his fanny.     Charging him with an error there is criminal.


 https://www.mlb.com/gameday/blue-jays-vs-orioles/2020/08/18/631681#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=videos,game=631681

(Scroll to “Travis Shaw scores go-ahead run”)

Davis doesn't deserve that error.  Sevy has to catch that. Not even a short hop or in between hop there.  Stay low, snag it, and put that tag on him.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Frobby said:

8/18, Game 23

The Jays scored the winning run when Pedro Severino couldn’t handle a one-bounce throw Chris Davis made from the seat of his pants after making a diving stop of a grounder.   It was scored an error on Davis, but to me the blame was squarely Severino’s.   I guess any bounced throw gets scored as an error on whoever threw the ball, but this was an accurate one-hopper with a true bounce, in plenty of time to get the runner, made while Davis was literally sitting on his fanny.     Charging him with an error there is criminal.


 https://www.mlb.com/gameday/blue-jays-vs-orioles/2020/08/18/631681#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=videos,game=631681

(Scroll to “Travis Shaw scores go-ahead run”)

It's certainly not criminal to give Davis the error.  It was a nice stop by him - but that was not a hard play for an average 1st baseman - his lack of range made it look much harder than it was.  And he had plenty of time to throw - since he was in and the ball was hard hit.  He didn't have to throw it with his feet in the air.  Should Severino have caught that - Yes, but that was a bad throw by Davis.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Terrific play by Davis. Also fielded a bunt perfectly on the leadoff hitter. Davis has finally found his role: extra innings defensive 1B sub. I have to say it was a genius move by Hyde to put him in there that very nearly paid off, and should have. 

He's the new Mike Squires!  Or maybe Dave Stapleton.  A little peek into what the Majors would be like if they had rosters the size of NCAA football teams.  You could have Brian Matusz on staff just to face David Oritz.  Chris Davis to play defense 17 innings a year.  Two or three outfielders with absurd arms ad nothing else just in case the winning run is on third base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Hyde on 10th inning miscues: “To me, that was just a great play getting to the ball and he was trying to make a game-saving play. No fault for that. Just him catching the ball saved a run there. Just tried to make a great play and it kind of skipped up on Sevie when he threw it from his rear end. I give credit to CD for getting to the ball on a tough ball down the line.

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2020/08/santanders-two-homers-still-leave-os-short-in-8-7-loss.html

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's a near certainty that Diaz is a better defensive outfielder than Mountcastle.  He's always been an outfielder.  Mountcastle has always been a guy searching for a position.  But it is also very likely that Mountcastle is a better hitter.

Cedric Mullins is also an outfielder that has always been an outfielder.  Does that make him better than Mountcastle too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CarrRun49 said:

The guy has yet to play 1 AAA game.  How is he a safer choice? 

I was referencing him being a safer choice in that context because at least he's been an outfielder for a long time and wouldn't be learning anew at the MLB level. IMO, yes, Mountcastle is ready offensively, but I think it makes sense to get him some reps in the OF if we're gonna put him there. 

Either isn't quite where we'd like them to be, but if I'm picking one over the other, I'd like to see Mountcastle have a defensive foundation and position (in theory) before throwing him out there. 

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bubble Buddy said:

I was referencing him being a safer choice in that context because at least he's been an outfielder for a long time and wouldn't be learning anew at the MLB level. IMO, yes, Mountcastle is ready offensively, but I think it makes sense to get him some reps in the OF if we're gonna put him there. 

How?  Did Wilkerson get a bunch of outfield reps?  Did Mancini?

How many games do you think a guy needs to be an upgrade over Smtih?

It's all about service time manipulation with Mountcastle, has been since last season.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bubble Buddy said:

I was referencing him being a safer choice in that context because at least he's been an outfielder for a long time and wouldn't be learning anew at the MLB level. IMO, yes, Mountcastle is ready offensively, but I think it makes sense to get him some reps in the OF if we're gonna put him there. 

What's the worst that can happen?  He fall down trying to get a ball and end up with a concussion?  No way that could happen to a guy that played a bunch of outfield in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What's the worst that can happen?  He fall down trying to get a ball and end up with a concussion?  No way that could happen to a guy that played a bunch of outfield in the minors.

 

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How?  Did Wilkerson get a bunch of outfield reps?  Did Mancini?

How many games do you think a guy needs to be an upgrade over Smtih?

It's all about service time manipulation with Mountcastle, has been since last season.

Mountcastle may already be an upgrade over Smith, but that says nothing. Wilkerson certainly surpised, although he's not much of a prospect so we didn't have much to lose. 

If Mountcastle was destined to be a DH, then by all means bring him up. But I think there's value in trying to bring him along at a pace that's best for him. Perhaps that pace is more coaching and instruction before we try to pass him as an OF? That's my main point. 

Unfortunately, normally we'd get to track his progress defensively in the minors. We don't get to see how he's being coached and the reps he's getting. 

 

 

 

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bubble Buddy said:

 

Mountcastle may already be an upgrade over Smith, but that says nothing. Wilkerson certainly surpised, although he's not much of a prospect so we didn't have much to lose. 

If Mountcastle was destined to be a DH, then by all means bring him up. But I think there's value in trying to bring him along at a pace that's best for him. Perhaps that pace is more coaching and instruction before we try to pass him as an OF? That's my main point. It's a plausible scenario. 

 

 

It isn't plausible.

Can you name any player that needed this many reps to learn to play LEFT FIELD?  If he hasn't gotten it yet more time taking fungos at Bowie ain't going to fix him.

This is not about his ability to play left field.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It isn't plausible.

Can you name any player that needed this many reps to learn to play LEFT FIELD?  If he hasn't gotten it yet more time taking fungos at Bowie ain't going to fix him.

This is not about his ability to play left field.

 

I understand your distrust of the organization. I also understand the service time manipulation game. But I also don't find reason to be overly critical of Elias yet and I don't mind taking him at his word for now.

 And again, if he's BSing because of service time, well, that's an MLB wide problem, not just us. 

The article below mentions in detail the work they are doing with Mountcastle. 

"Executive vice president/general manager Mike Elias said this was “a unique opportunity to get some real development done,” both with his plate discipline and at his new position in left field. Mountcastle is getting targeted coaching at both."

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-ryan-mountcastle-bowie-camp-20200807-getfuiiepnetbjofa7vhkcd2xa-story.html

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • If we don't want to trade one of our big three (or four?) prospects, then focusing on bad contracts or rentals is our only option to salvage this season.  Better to do that than to do nothing.  If we only do rentals, we'll need to add one or more starters over the offseason through free agency.  If Rubinstein has told Elias that he's willing to spend in free agency, then that reduces Elias' need to get a starter who is controllable beyond this year.  
    • That STRK column in the standings is very persuasive.  Look elsewhere and you'll see that in spite of the L5 they still have the top run differential in the AL and are closer to the East lead than they were a week ago. 
    • This is a mix of hitting two really hot teams, our pitching attrition, and just some bad luck. Everything is not going their way right now.  Sure, I think the rotation needs some help after losing Bradish, Means, Wells and Kremer and yes, Elias should have done more this offseason to sure up this pen (I was saying that all offseason and through spring), but when the team pitches good it doesn't hit and when they score a bunch, their pitching stinks.  This team was not going to continue on a 105-win pace with their pitching injuries, but luckily, the Yankees have not been playing great either after being lights out for awhile (while the Orioles were red-hot).  No this team is not going to go into a giant tailspin where they end up under .500 and yes, they will eventually break out of this. We saw in the schedule this was a tough stretch of opponents and lack of off days and it's just kind of caught up just as they hot two teams getting hot.  They're going to be fine when it comes to making the playoffs. Now, do they have a deep playoff caliber rotation and bullpen? No, I think they need to make moves, move that are going cost some players people don't want to see go, but when you have never drafted and developed a major league pitcher in 5 years of drafting, this is what your strategy was devised for.  Develop the bats, trade/acquire for the arms. Now it's time to see if Elias is able to fulfill his strategy.
    • Not addressing the bullpen other than a stopgap closer in the offseason is kinda coming home to roost now. Doesn't help that Cano and Perez haven't been very good either. The rotation has just been pure bad luck. When your 2/4/5 plus Wells are gone, sooner or later you are going to feel it. Irvin and Suarez have pitched above expectations but you gotta assume they are going to settle into mid-4 ERAs sooner or later. No idea what the front office is going to do by the deadline. It's a sellers market it seems. I will say I hope major moves are made between now and the start of the 25 season, because it is pee or get off the pot with a lot of these guys on the farm.  And if Burnes isn't back, there is a TON of pitching that needs to be added.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...