Jump to content

It's time for the OH to turn the page


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

I mean, stranger things have happened.  Not unusual to see relievers succeed out of nowhere but we have a total of 15 innings this year between 2 players, who have had zero ML success despite being older, and we are already penciling them into future BPs?  
 

I just don’t see the logic there.  You can be happy with what you see out of them without going overboard about their future prospects within the organization.

They can throw strikes. Their pitches have good movement.  Hyde is showing faith in both players.  Hyde is using Sulser as a closer which shows he will give him every chance. Lakins is not that old.  He just turned 26 on June 26th.   In baseball terms this is his age 25th season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the enthusiasm, and I really hope Wildcard is right, but until the legit starting pitchers start making their way to the roster and prove they are MLB starters, then I think it is premature to say that we've "turned the corner".  I'm completely down for making the playoffs this year though! Let's do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

Yes I did have a typo with Hardy but he was twice the player back then that Iglesias is now....  Hays matching Jones’ production would be welcome.

If all this pans out then Elias built a championship roster off waiver claims.  

And MacPhail traded Brett Jacobson and James Hoey for Hardy.  That is basically a wire claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I know you won't provide any evidence to support this assertion but maybe you could ask someone else to?  I'd be really interested since I've never seen any evidence that is how things work.

If you don't know that if a team has a group of good hitters it makes it hard to pitch around batters, I can't help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

If you don't know that if a team has a group of good hitters it makes it hard to pitch around batters, I can't help you.

I don't know that.  You don't know that.  You assume that.

The studies I've seen, and I have seen studies, don't show much much of an effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't know that.  You don't know that.  You assume that.

The studies I've seen, and I have seen studies, don't show much much of an effect.

Go fight with Drungo

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I mean, players definitely improve when you surround them with better players.  They would have anyway, but putting better players around them didn't sabotage the development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wildcard said:

They can throw strikes. Their pitches have good movement.  Hyde is showing faith in both players.  Hyde is using Sulser as a closer which shows he will give him every chance. Lakins is not that old.  He just turned 26 on June 26th.   In baseball terms this is his age 25th season.

He’s not old but he has also accomplished nothing in the majors until now.  That’s not normal.

Hyde doesn’t have much of a choice but to use these guys.  That doesn’t really mean anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

He’s not old but he has also accomplished nothing in the majors until now.  That’s not normal.

Hyde doesn’t have much of a choice but to use these guys.  That doesn’t really mean anything.

Larkins didn't have Holt coaching him until now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/10/2020 at 11:39 AM, Dipper9 said:
On 8/9/2020 at 9:47 AM, TINSTAAPP said:

ago?

Yes, but our pitching was very good in that series.  The bats just went cold.  I'd rather lose low scoring pitching duels than the blowouts from a year ago. 

The Mariners, in the glory days of King Felix, CONSTANTLY lost games 1-0 or 2-1. His ERA was about 1.9, but the Mariner batting average wasn’t much higher.

(I don’t know how many HOF pitchers have such a disparity between personal performance and W-L record, but King Felix will be right up there.)

It does get old, me boy.

our pitching isn’t nearly as good as the Mariners’ and at .248, our team BA isn’t much better than theirs was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I do still think Givens could gets traded though. I just don't expect a lot in return

He’s not going to get traded unless he gets a lot more innings. Right now he has fewer innings than all but two guys, one of whom is no longer with the team.
Plus, he’s got to show success in high leverage situations again, Otherwise we will be basically giving him away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Sulser and Lakin are going to be part of the future?

If the future is tomorrow, sure.

Seriously though, Sulser is 30, He’s pre-arbitration, and there’s no reason he can’t give us a couple of good years as a solid reliever.

I do not know enough about Lakins to comment on him, but No reason he can’t do the same.

On the other hand, Carroll, Phillips, Hess, Eshelman, Fry, can all go away today and never be missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He’s not old but he has also accomplished nothing in the majors until now.  That’s not normal.

Hyde doesn’t have much of a choice but to use these guys.  That doesn’t really mean anything.

That’s true, but he obviously considers them to be the best guys he has available or he would be using the other guys instead. Also, yes yes yes small sample size and all that, but the fact is they are producing.

Certainly remains to be seen whether they will be producing equally well after 15 more innings, But waiver claims are always guys who got pushed out because somebody else was better. That means the guys pushed out of really good systems are not necessarily bad.

Guys we get rid of, yes they’re terrible,( Yaz excepted of course) But getting one of Tampa Bay’s rejects is not a bad thing, even if he is 30. I’m not disagreeing with you, I’m just saying that it’s probably not as bleak as you’re suggesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He’s not old but he has also accomplished nothing in the majors until now.  That’s not normal.

Hyde doesn’t have much of a choice but to use these guys.  That doesn’t really mean anything.

I think it's possible the Orioles see something in these guys that they like and it's possible that they'll thrive with the right coaching and environment and data.

Sulser has had ridiculous K rates in the minors since 2016.  In the old days (10+ years ago) someone with 12 or 14 K/9 in AAA would be tagged as a coming closer.  I don't know how to read that stuff anymore, not with the league K rate at 9, and that guy you just saw looking at motor oil at WalMart strikes out seven per nine.  But 12 K/9 can't be a bad thing.

wildcard could be right in this case, just for the wrong reasons.  He thinks Sulser is awesome because he hasn't allowed a run over his last three games.  Of course that's silly, but whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think Mountcastle is the foremost person hurt by Walltimore. I honestly think we need to reconsider what type of right handed batters we throw out there. More Luis Arraez or someone with high OBP. I could see Mountcastle having a revival somewhere else. But not sure it’s really working here anymore, even though he was solid last year. 
    • Who is the real MOO bat though?  I can't think of one other than Soto available.  I am all in on Soto, but I don't think the Orioles will even sniff him.  Absent Soto, who do you look to acquire? I agree that it is time to move on from Tony and Mounty, but I do think you are a little harsh on Tony.  He has won a number of games for this team in the clutch.  He is just prone to cold spells.  
    • OK, there won't be 30 making actual bids but Burnes is free to sign with any team at the highest price. There is one very big reason he won't sign with us, which is money. We do have payroll flexibility but that evaporates if we put $40m/year in one player. I would love this if it happens but my expectations are very low. Even if we are "one of the favorites", say the final four, we only have a 25% chance. Probably lower if any of the others are in larger markets. So I have to agree with Roch's assessment. 
    • In that case the question could be do we pay Mountcastle 6-7M or do we pay a AAAA guy league minimum and use his money on RP. The purpose of keeping Mountcastle was the hope he would eventually break out and have a career year. He’s regressing offensively and the odds of that breakout are shrinking. 
    • With his season now over, curious what happened to the version of Cowser we drafted. looking at his scouting report coming out of Sam Houston State, the concern with him was would his power translate to MLB while his plate discipline and ability to draw walks being a plus. Certainly were concerns about the strikeouts but nowhere near the concerns of someone like Honeycutt.    He finishes the year with 52 walks and 172 strikeouts, with a 30% K rate. He was near the top of the league in strikeouts for most of the year.  is this purely his issues with off speed pitches? Can this be improved or do we accept the awful strikeouts and laud the plus defense.
    • I want to also address the Harper point. I'm talking about RISP, not "late and close". We can talk about high leverage/late and close in a diff convo, but strictly RISP: Bryce Harper 2023: 272/.803 2024: 331/ 1.122 2023 was a goofy year for Harper coming off of Tommy John. He looked good in April, but was a disaster in May/June before finishing the season on fire that year. I don't think he's a good case study for your example. Besides, I'm not talking singular player performance. I'm talking as a team which is far less susceptible to SSS and "chance". FWIW, I do think luck somewhat plays into this.  But let's look at this as a team. 1,298 AB with RISP for the O's this year. A 251 BA. Last year they hit 287. That's a 36 point difference. Yeah, only 3.6%. But let's look at what 3.6% means with that many AB. That means: 47 extra hits. I don't believe that 47 hits explains "luck" or "chance". Maybe for certain hitters in certain situations. There is an element of BABIP here. In 2024, it was 317. This year? 289. So, if we truly believe 300 is league average, they were a little unlucky this year, and somewhat lucky last year. But we are still talking about a dramatic dropoff. Now, is that because of playing more rookies this year? Because of the injuries? Very possibly. And in a 2 game series that can rear its ugly head. But there was nothing unlucky about yesterday or the day before. They just came up completely empty. Maybe the only unlucky situations were Ramon and Westy rips being caught.
    • I mentioned this once before but if you follow high end D1 softball the game has changed dramatically because the pitching is so dominate.  The theory is, you aren't going to score a bunch of runs by stringing singles together so most top programs only recruit athletes with game changing power or speed.  The speed aspect is important because you can turn a single into a double by stealing so now it only takes 2 hits to score a run instead of 3.   The O's lower minors seem to be stacked with guys that can steal bases so maybe that will be the change in philosophy moving forward.   It is just a thought but maybe the organization see's the pitching trend that is dominating because of the bullpen usage and OBP and runs scored across the board are down.  So stack your team with power and or speed and not much else matters.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...