Jump to content

Santander Gold Glove finalist


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Defensive stats are all over the place. And some are more important for one position than for others, of course. Which ones are the most revealing? I personally care less about range, which can be assisted with good intel and preparatory placement, than I do about being sure handed, and I’m more interested in accuracy on throws than brute strength. So what are the best defensive stats? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Philip said:

Defensive stats are all over the place. And some are more important for one position than for others, of course. Which ones are the most revealing? I personally care less about range, which can be assisted with good intel and preparatory placement, than I do about being sure handed, and I’m more interested in accuracy on throws than brute strength. So what are the best defensive stats? 

Outfield is such a delicate balance. There were a couple years where Markakis could handle anything off the scoreboard or near the grounds crew bench and Jones had a terrific ability to range back to the 410 in center. I’m not sure what the metrics say about it, but outfield seems to have a lot to do with who is next to you, especially with those two. 
 

Santander was fun to watch this year, I can’t remember him making a bad play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember an error by Santander in the first game of the season.Joey Gallo accumulated 12 DRS in RF for the Rangers, best among MLB outfielders( and second-best overall behind Arenado) but he did it in 57 games.
Santander had 8 DRS in only 37 games. I don’t know how DRS is calculated, but 8 in 37 extrapolates to 12 in 55 so they maybe weren’t as far apart as all that.

on the other hand, at Baseball Savant, Gallo had 3 outs above average and 3 runs prevented, and Santander had 1 and 1. Again, in 57 and 37 games, respectively.
and this year the award is given based on “The society for American baseball research index” and that’s a private formula, so we have to wait and see.
Either way, I’m happy to have Anthony, and look forward to having him around for a while.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • His fastball is way down, his strikeouts are awful. He's had 2 IL stints for his elbow and back. He's probably the riskiest proposition to even finish the season healthy let alone be effective. 
    • Is Mountcastle sacrificing power to maintain a higher average or has his bat speed slowed?   I think we were all excited when Mounty made it to the majors.  We knew we likely had a guy with low on base skills but he was also known to have pretty good contact rate and high-end power.  I remember when he hit 2 HR's in a game against Toronto at the start of his MLB career and he just pummeled a couple of middle in fastballs into left field.  In fact, it was obvious that you couldn't go inside on him because he had the capability of pulling balls off the plate inside and hitting bombs.  It became apparent the book got out on him and we saw the struggles on the sliders off the plate.  It appears he has made some adjustments over the last year by really focusing on letting the ball get deep and hitting the ball to the right side.   I am just not sure this version of Mountcastle is better than the other one that was looking to turn and burn on every mistake pitch.  Now we have a player that still has a low OBP even with a little higher average and diminished power numbers.   If he is never going to be a high on base guy I think I might rather see him start looking to pull the ball more and focus on his power numbers.   Thoughts?
    • Counting on Luzardo to be both healthy and pitching well is a big risk.  The trade package carries almost no risk at all.   The problem is that if Luzardo is the only starter acquired you have a much greater risk of losing the division.   The rotation is razor thin right now and Luzardo might not even be available until sometime in September and he wasn’t that great in April and May.
    • Man, no bump for Grayson after either of his last 2 starts.   Since that ugly Houston game, 19.1IP, 5ER, 5BB, 20K. I know we're not supposed to care about pitcher wins but with his general consistency and this team's offense he's got a shot to make a run at 20.  I'd like to see, though the legend of Mike Boddicker grows with each passing year.
    • This is pretty reasonable.  Scott might cost more due to market demands.  
    • Maybe?  It depends on who that pitcher is.    The Os are going to coast to the playoffs and perhaps the division. The whole idea is to make your team as good as possible for the stretch run and into the playoffs.    Fedde MAY (we have no idea if he will keep this up) be safer but do you feel comfortable with him starting game 3?  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...