Jump to content

Tim Dierkes: Orioles should trade John Means


waynebug

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

So I was told some info yesterday about ownership.  Without going into details, if it is true what I heard (and I don’t doubt do that it was), they will be cheaping out again this offseason and we could see these types of players traded because of money.

Were there any names attached to "these type of players"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

So I was told some info yesterday about ownership.  Without going into details, if it is true what I heard (and I don’t doubt do that it was), they will be cheaping out again this offseason and we could see these types of players traded because of money.

I don’t have any inside info but that’s seemed apparent for a long time now. If they trade Means “because of money” they should just shut it down or move. Not that I think they will trade him……

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Were there any names attached to "these type of players"?

No..that’s me adding to it.  IE, if they are going to be cheap again, anyone making any amount of money could be on the chopping block.  Luckily, guys like Means and Mullins are still not making any money, so there may not be a “forced trade”.

But if they are going to continue to be cheap until they can sell, it may be that they decide to offload guys like Means if they feel his value is at its peak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, waroriole said:

I don’t have any inside info but that’s seemed apparent for a long time now. If they trade Means “because of money” they should just shut it down or move. Not that I think they will trade him……

Yes but based on what I heard, the problem isn’t going away (ie, this isn’t just a 2022 problem) until they sell…once PA passes away.  They won’t sell before that I’m sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes but based on what I heard, the problem isn’t going away (ie, this isn’t just a 2022 problem) until they sell…once PA passes away.  They won’t sell before that I’m sure.

I'm still not sure why folks think they will sell and not just keep owning the team and the RSN and skimming off profits.

I could see them selling, but I can also see them keeping the team.  It's a solid source of income.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm still not sure why folks think they will sell and not just keep owning the team and the RSN and skimming off profits.

I was just about to ask Sports Guy. I see all the speculation about a sale but is there anything concrete anywhere, of any kind, indicating a post mortem sale? 

If estate taxes were actually an issue, why wouldn't the brothers just sell minority interests and keep the majority?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 7Mo said:

I was just about to ask Sports Guy. I see all the speculation about a sale but is there anything concrete anywhere, of any kind, indicating a post mortem sale? 

If estate taxes were actually an issue, why wouldn't the brothers just sell minority interests and keep the majority?

I think, at least for some folks, is they are hoping they sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes but based on what I heard, the problem isn’t going away (ie, this isn’t just a 2022 problem) until they sell…once PA passes away.  They won’t sell before that I’m sure.

If that’s the case, they need to realize they’re not capable of owning this team. I don’t believe this team hasn’t turned a profit this year and there’s no reason to think they won’t continue to make more next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waroriole said:

If that’s the case, they need to realize they’re not capable of owning this team. I don’t believe this team hasn’t turned a profit this year and there’s no reason to think they won’t continue to make more next year. 

I think all these low payroll savings are earmarked for the estate tax and not a front line pitcher in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The Orioles are one game back of the Yankees in the loss column for the division, 6 games up on the Twins for the first Wild Card, 7 games ahead of the Royals for the last playoff spot. We may not win the division but it would take an abysmal second half to miss the playoffs.  Given that I would love to add to this team in the bullpen and a starter if the price was right but I would give us as good a chance as anyone to win the AL even if we didn't make a trade based on our top two starters and the power of our lineup.  I believe our lineup with Mayo at third or Holliday at second by the start of the playoffs to go with Gunnar SS, Rutschman C, Santander RF, O'Hearn DH, Westburg 2B/3B, Mountcastle 1B, Cowser/Kjerstad LF and Mullins CF is better and likely significantly better than any team but the Dodgers.  
    • It is more or less. Once you get in the playoffs, all the teams are talented and all the teams have some kind of weakness. Sure there are better teams on paper and some of the teams probably have more talent than others. But I just don't think it's all that drastic of a difference most of time. It's not like you're sticking the Athletics or White Sox in the playoffs and calling it a crap shoot.
    • The 2018 Red Sox won 108 games that year. I don't remember many if any people questioning their chances or considering them a long shot goin into the tournament. There are a few other teams on that list who were by no means long shots either. No on to your point about posters on this board, as late as last week there were several posters arguing that Irvin/Suarez/Kremer/Povich would be fine as your third starter going into the postseason. Now, after 3 consecutive series of really poor pitching, some have changed their minds. But many have shifted from "we don't need to trade" to "we can get a good pitcher but don't trade any of our good prospects". Like it somehow works that way.
    • He's athletic enough to play there is the main thing. The rest is a learning curve. Not sure the timing is right when they're trying to make the playoffs, there's likely to be a few hiccups along the way. But I'd be fine with it. Who knows if they're even considering it?
    • Yeah , only if Holiday is motivated & desire the task of studying CF
    • No.  Nor are they going to lead the O's to the AL East cellar next week.  Elias is going to need to get some pitching, nobody is arguing otherwise.
    • Exactly this. While I appreciate he could be the guy, they are loaded at MIF. The more I watch Westburg the more I'm convinced he IS a dude. Calling up Mayo to play 3B I'm only slightly hesitant about because I've read regarding his defense. Westburg looks more comfortable at third to me, but I love that he's played 2B at a high level as well. Nice to have so many options.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...