Jump to content

Orioles looking to trade Means?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

I would hate to see Means gone but if we can get 4 half decent prospects ( I know... TINSTAAPP) for Dylan Bundy, what can we get for Means? 4 truly ML-ready guys?

 

The "problem" is Elias is shrewd and demanding. I doubt anyone is going to put up what he wants in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

Thats basically what I would want in return. Maybe a SS. But with Means struggling to pitch an entire season, we may need to move on early and get the best return 

And basically that's what Elias always wants, pitching, pitching, pitching, pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I see the word dangling and I don't take it as testing the market.  I take it as actively shopping.

Sounds like another cost cutting move.

Meh, it’s the reporter’s choice of words, and I don’t make that much of it.   There’s a fine line between “testing the market” and “actively shopping.”   Either way you’re finding out what you could get in exchange for the player.

I will put the odds of Means being traded at 30%.    I’m sure his 2022 salary isn’t an issue, it’s a matter of whether what we’d get in exchange will help the O’s compete more than keeping Means would.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elias is telling you now that winning in 2022 still isn’t a priority.  They aren’t going to make moves.  Any improvement of the team Comes from within and that’s it.

So, you are now looking at 2024 as the first realistic season this team is a true contender.  Are you keeping Means (and Mullins for that matter) are for 2 more seasons just for that final one?  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Elias is telling you now that winning in 2022 still isn’t a priority.  They aren’t going to make moves.  Any improvement of the team Comes from within and that’s it.

So, you are now looking at 2024 as the first realistic season this team is a true contender.  Are you keeping Means (and Mullins for that matter) are for 2 more seasons just for that final one?  

Ideally everyone arrives in 2023 and we compete for the WC2 spot. Everyone needs pitching. I have no problem flipping current assets for future assets that will actually be here when we are “good”. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Elias is telling you now that winning in 2022 still isn’t a priority.  They aren’t going to make moves.  Any improvement of the team Comes from within and that’s it.

So, you are now looking at 2024 as the first realistic season this team is a true contender.  Are you keeping Means (and Mullins for that matter) are for 2 more seasons just for that final one?  

I didn't read that Elias thinks winning is not a priority.  Just that he expects the improvement to come internally.   I am sure he will add a few low cost players like a back up catcher, 3B, lefthanded reliever and probably a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Ideally everyone arrives in 2023 and we compete for the WC2 spot. Everyone needs pitching. I have no problem flipping current assets for future assets that will actually be here when we are “good”. 

It’s not going to work like that.  This is the fallacy of rebuilding.  You don’t just bring everyone up and say, we are here to win!  They have to develop and learn up here.  They have to have talent around them to succeed.  
 

Elias keeps selling the fan base on the idea that we have the first or second best farm system.  BFD!  You don’t win because of that.  You don’t get a trophy for that.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s not going to work like that.  This is the fallacy of rebuilding.  You don’t just bring everyone up and say, we are here to win!  They have to develop and learn up here.  They have to have talent around them to succeed.  
 

Elias keeps selling the fan base on the idea that we have the first or second best farm system.  BFD!  You don’t win because of that.  You don’t get a trophy for that.

 

But you get to keep your job because of that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...