Jump to content

Left field at OPACY going through a big change


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

This just occurred to me... When they do get back to contention and they want to sell more tickets they could just put a rope across where the fence used to be and have the overflow crowd stand behind it.  They'd do this all the time 100 years ago, often to ridiculous effect, with the crowd encroaching on the foul lines, and standing so close any ball hit over the ropes was a ground rule double.  Here it would just be the same configuration we've had for nearly 30 years.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

This just occurred to me... When they do get back to contention and they want to sell more tickets they could just put a rope across where the fence used to be and have the overflow crowd stand behind it.  They'd do this all the time 100 years ago, often to ridiculous effect, with the crowd encroaching on the foul lines, and standing so close any ball hit over the ropes was a ground rule double.  Here it would just be the same configuration we've had for nearly 30 years.

I've seen photos from that ear. Rather comical. Or maybe just have wooden bleachers there tucked into the wall like the rollout ones at Cameron Indoor Stadium. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

This just occurred to me... When they do get back to contention and they want to sell more tickets they could just put a rope across where the fence used to be and have the overflow crowd stand behind it.  They'd do this all the time 100 years ago, often to ridiculous effect, with the crowd encroaching on the foul lines, and standing so close any ball hit over the ropes was a ground rule double.  Here it would just be the same configuration we've had for nearly 30 years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

 

Coogan's Bluff was outside the Polo Grounds.  I was thinking more like this scene from Boston in 1910 where the real outfield wall was behind the spectators standing in the OF, so they just threw some ropes and posts up kind of like the lines at the airport.  As you see they'd often let the fans stand just behind the foul lines and coaching boxes.  It's a miracle nobody got killed by a line drive.

e1a4d9986a29c008473f787af50f91b7--boston

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

That looks horrible.

So many questions from the perspective of today.

  • Did they push everyone back before the game started?
  • Were hard-hit balls so rare in the deadball era that nobody really had a fear of getting killed by a ball standing 30-40 feet from home?
  • People are standing right behind home.  Assuming nobody brought a glove.  Really?
  • How many ground rule singles/doubles were there?  In a modern game at least every inning or two a ball would be hit into the crowd.
  • Was the expectation that the fielders would fight the fans for balls?
  • Where did the batting team go?  Where are the dugouts?  There's people everywhere.
  • The umpire(s) were probably like WTF... I am going to get killed today.
  • If I'm standing along the rope in the OF I'm kicking every visiting hit back to my outfielder, and anything my team hits either disappears, or gets kicked as from from a fielder as possible.
  • If you're in the fifth row of the standing room you aren't seeing anything unless you're 6' 3".
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

So many questions from the perspective of today.

  • Did they push everyone back before the game started?
  • Were hard-hit balls so rare in the deadball era that nobody really had a fear of getting killed by a ball standing 30-40 feet from home?
  • People are standing right behind home.  Assuming nobody brought a glove.  Really?
  • How many ground rule singles/doubles were there?  In a modern game at least every inning or two a ball would be hit into the crowd.
  • Was the expectation that the fielders would fight the fans for balls?
  • Where did the batting team go?  Where are the dugouts?  There's people everywhere.
  • The umpire(s) were probably like WTF... I am going to get killed today.
  • If I'm standing along the rope in the OF I'm kicking every visiting hit back to my outfielder, and anything my team hits either disappears, or gets kicked as from from a fielder as possible.
  • If you're in the fifth row of the standing room you aren't seeing anything unless you're 6' 3".

They should implement this again immediately.  Would make everything more interesting.  C'mon, let's put some lives on the line.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2022 at 11:01 AM, Can_of_corn said:

I'm fine with them moving the wall back but I'm unhappy with what I have seen concerning how the bullpen is incorporated.  I think they could have done a more comprehensive redesign. 

I agree. My hope is that this maybe is a trial run - and if they like it, they'll do a more comprehensive redesign and move the bullpens back. I'm not optimistic though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2022 at 12:53 PM, DrungoHazewood said:

This just occurred to me... When they do get back to contention and they want to sell more tickets they could just put a rope across where the fence used to be and have the overflow crowd stand behind it.  They'd do this all the time 100 years ago, often to ridiculous effect, with the crowd encroaching on the foul lines, and standing so close any ball hit over the ropes was a ground rule double.  Here it would just be the same configuration we've had for nearly 30 years.

To make even more interesting, you make any ball in the play behind the white chalk outline (vs a rope) in play and allow outfielders to run into the crowd to get to the ball. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Coogan's Bluff was outside the Polo Grounds.  I was thinking more like this scene from Boston in 1910 where the real outfield wall was behind the spectators standing in the OF, so they just threw some ropes and posts up kind of like the lines at the airport.  As you see they'd often let the fans stand just behind the foul lines and coaching boxes.  It's a miracle nobody got killed by a line drive.

e1a4d9986a29c008473f787af50f91b7--boston

That can't be during a game. That has to be some kind of after game situation or some kind of carnival like event since the players look to be hanging out near the pitching mound relaxing. Besides, literally there are fans just behind 3B. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

That can't be during a game. That has to be some kind of after game situation or some kind of carnival like event since the players look to be hanging out near the pitching mound relaxing. Besides, literally there are fans just behind 3B. lol

They must have moved people around when the game started, but this was listed as a game the Red Sox and Tigers in 1910.  I've seen photos of old games where clearly the players were playing and there were fans right on the other side of the foul lines.  And around the infield.  And behind ropes that were 50' inside the fences in the outfield.   Stuff they'd never, ever, ever think about allowing today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Porky said:

I agree. My hope is that this maybe is a trial run - and if they like it, they'll do a more comprehensive redesign and move the bullpens back. I'm not optimistic though.

Not exactly to your point, but the mention of a trial run reminded me about an article I was reading yesterday - couple of months old but I missed it when it first came out. The author made an interesting observation that other teams in recent years that went with pitcher friendly dimensions (Tigers, Mets) ended up deciding to move their fences back in after a few years to keep players and fans happy. I'll be curious to see how long this change sticks, or if getting snubbed by enough high-profile right-handed power hitters will generate pressure to recalibrate.

https://www.thescore.com/mlb/news/2280317/amp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, deward said:

Not exactly to your point, but the mention of a trial run reminded me about an article I was reading yesterday - couple of months old but I missed it when it first came out. The author made an interesting observation that other teams in recent years that went with pitcher friendly dimensions (Tigers, Mets) ended up deciding to move their fences back in after a few years to keep players and fans happy. I'll be curious to see how long this change sticks, or if getting snubbed by enough high-profile right-handed power hitters will generate pressure to recalibrate.

https://www.thescore.com/mlb/news/2280317/amp

From what I call determine about the O's, they aren't likely to meet the demands of many high profile right handed hitters (or left handed hitters).  I like the bigger ballpark for the advantage it gives our pitchers.  Camden Yards seems like it will be closer to average than an extreme pitcher's park.  In the past, posters have stated no free agent pitcher will come to the O's due to the extreme hitting environment.  The Yankees seem to have no problem attracting free agent pitchers as free agents usually sign where they are offered the most money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I do remember seeing that Basallo went #1 overall in the winter league draft last year. So that will probably be where he ends up. Heck, that’s probably better competition. 
    • I don't think it's as lop-sided as you seem to.   Pre-roid it's close to a bump.  30/30 to 40/40 range in those years for Bonds.   Sure Ohtani could be using similar types of supplements result wise but the focused workouts would look different for Ohtani if he's not pitching. 
    • If you can get him on a 3-4 year deal at $20m or less, it's interesting. But here's the rub w/ Santander: yeah, he's a SH. That's great. And he generally has even splits. But he's not great defensively. He reminds me of a SH Nelson Cruz but without the batting average or OBP. I'm not so sure that ages well. I'd extend the QO and pursue a number of other of other options.  To me, it's better to get the draft pick and, say, sign a guy like Tyler O'Neill, Joc Pederson, or Jurickson Profar as your DH/OF type and maybe give RF to Kjerstad.
    • I'm bringing back: Offense/Defense C - Adley SS - Gunnar 3B - Westburg 2B - Holliday 1B - Mountcastle DH - Kjerstad LF - Cowser CF - Cowser/Mullins RF - ? Backup OF - ? Backup C - ? Utility - Urias Starting Pitchers SP1: Eflin SP2: Grayson SP3: Acquire somebody SP4: Kremer SP5: Suarez Relievers Closer: Felix Setup: Cano Late Relief: Webb Late Relief: Coulombe Late Relief: Perez Middle/Long Relief: Akin Reliever: ? Reliever: ? Depth SP: Povich, McDermott, Rogers RP: McDermott I'm bringing back, but not giving a spot to: Mayo Rogers Guys I'm giving a QO offer to: Burnes Santander - I really go back and forth with Santander. He's not great in the outfield. His average and OBP is a liability. But his power is prolific. Does that age well? I don't think so. I'd extend the QO and move on. I'm not bringing back: Mateo - had surgery at the end of August, could he be back in the middle of the season next year? Sure, but he's a FA after next season, and paying over $3m for a guy that might not play nor be effective isn't an adequate use of money Dominguez - I could be convinced to keep him if we're desperate Soto - was a poor acquisition not just because of the talent given up, but because he was always a situational guy with control issues O'Hearn - $8m for a guy that really shouldn't be in the field and can only hit righties is a lot of loot Santander - Give a QO, move on Eloy - Duh This means we need to acquire the following: Starting Pitcher(s) The O's can't go into next season giving Povich a spot and they definitely can not give a spot to Rogers. Rogers needs to be a deep depth arm until he showcases an increase in velocity and/or incredible promise that he can be serviceable and not a WHIP disaster who can barely go 5. Targets: Snell, Burnes, Fried, Wacha, Severino, Morton, etc.  Reliever(s) No more Phillies castoffs. No more waiver wire, dumpster diving for the entire bullpen. No more washed up vets.  Targets: David Robertson, Tommy Kahnle, Blake Treinen, Andrew Kittredge, Tanner Scott, etc. Position Player(s) Backup C (give more time to the backup if a better hitter so Adley can be fresh throughout year) Targets: Elias Diaz, Travis d'Arnaud (although I reckon the Braves pickup his option), Jacob Stallings. I guess if they're desperate they can stick with Blake Hunt (in the minors) Corner OF We could always acquire a bat first OF and then put Kjerstad in the OF. Targets: Tyler O'Neill, Jurickson Profar, Joc Pederson, etc. Backup OF Could be Mullins if they, say, call up Beavers and sign another OF, otherwise these are a dime a dozen out there. Just get somebody that can platoon since it's a heavy LHH OF right now. I'd entertain the O's calling up Beavers. 
    • I don't think Davis continued to put in the same level of effort on his fitness after he signed the huge deal.  
    • I think he easily surpasses 3/$55 million in this year's market, so it's kind of a moot point. "QO, take it or leave it" is still my final answer.
    • I would bet there are people in their mid to late 40's that don't remember the O's World Series win.  My dad wasn't a big sports guy and back then family's had one TV.  I don't remember much about sports before the O's coming up just short in 1982.  Definitely don't remember 1979 World Series even though I was 9.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...