Jump to content

Kumar reappears


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

My guess is if he's healthy he doesn't make it until the O's second pick.

I agree with this, this draft in particular is so thin on pitching that if he's healthy and looking anything close to what he was, he's going first round, but probably out of top 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

A lot will depend on how Kumar looks in his independent league action.  I haven't heard that he has pitched in any games.  If he has good results, I could see him going in the mid 1st round.  Poor results and he might be lucky to go as high as late 2nd round, imo.

I would rather the O's pick a top college starter w/ their second pick.  Someone who actually pitched this year or had an injury that is rehabbing well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for bumping this thread.  I knew his first start was coming up soon and it looks like he just had it.

Kumar Rocker has promising first start for Tri-City ValleyCats (calltothepen.com)

He lasted for four innings, striking out six while allowing two runs on three hits. After holding Trois-Rivieres Aigles scoreless over the first three innings, he began to tire, allowing a two run homer to former Braves farmhand Carlos Martinez.

However, the outing could be considered an overall positive for Rocker. His fastball sat between 95 and 97 MPH, reaching as high as 99 MPH on the radar gun. His slider showed plenty of life and was in the mid to upper 80s. It was as strong an outing as could have been hoped for.

Kumar Rocker impressive in debut as ValleyCats win (timesunion.com)

Pitching in front of scouts from at least 20 big league teams, Rocker left the game behind 2-0 before the ValleyCats routed the Trois-Rivieres pitching staff.

"I thought he pitched great," Incaviglia said. "For a guy that hadn't pitched in a year, he had good command and I think he made one mistake. He threw a 3-2 slider (to Martinez). Everything else was really good.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Well at least he showed he still has his velocity.  It's hard to get much info on how good he is from independent league action.  I assume the competition level is somewhat below rookie ball, but with older players. 

Are you saying striking out the Lew Ford's of the baseball world isn't the best indicator of MLB success? 🙂

Rocker was showing good velocity and that's probably the most important thing for now besides not being sore after he pitches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've been thinking about #2 a lot and wondering why this didn't come up at Elias' press conference.  I think the answer if you have to target a RH bat who isn't solely power-focused or chasing HR numbers, but who is otherwise a caliber of lefty-masher better than Mounty. Or, you force that hitter here via trade.
    • Last offseason with John (I am so poor) Angelos still in charge, along with the depth in the upper minor leagues it made sense to make a trade for someone like Burnes.  I don't think Elias should be looking at making a trade this offseason using any of our young talent.  It is time for Rubenstein to open the checkbook and land us a TOR starter and a big bat.  The days of having too many prospects is over, I want to see us have some solid depth options in AAA if we need it.
    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...