Jump to content

Sunday, May 7th @Braves on Peacock/NBC


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Moshagge3 said:

Stowers giving the lineup nothing.

Here's the thing with Stowers. He can be awful 2 or 3 at bats and then hit a 420 foot home run in that fourth at bat. He's definitely a guy that will look very bad at the plate at times. then again, he always hit left-handers better than right-handers in his career but Hyde refuse to bat him against left-handers after the 5th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

2nd and 3rd with no one out and they get a ground out RBI. That's it. This team really struggles to hit with RISP. Again, I get it, Eldred is a good, but everyone is trying to pull everything. 

McCann hit it very hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

They need him to change his approach with two strikes. He can't be in "I need to be able to drive the ball" mode with two strikes. The guy is an awful two-strike hitter and unfortunately, he takes a lot of strikes and fouls off a lot of pitches and ends up in two strike counts way too often.

He could learn something from Frazier or Urias in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I would be very surprised. First, it's in the bloodstream for the Angelos family to ensure they can always make a profit so they are not going to risk someone crashing. Two, Elias has shown no appetite for taking on risk. None. He doesn't move top prospects for need. He doesn't sign pitchers for more than a season. He has shown no interest in taking on risk with long term contracts.

 

I've said this before. Elias has done a good job, overall, drafting and acquiring position-player and relief pitching talent, and in putting a good, .500ish team on the field at a very low cost. But he appears to have no plan in place for putting together a good starting rotation. There are two obvious ways to do that: signing high-level free agents to costly, long-term contracts, and trading some of the excess position-player talent in the system. (The first may not, as a practical matter, be available to him, though he's spoken as though it is or may be.) 

Both those options are things in which Elias has zero experience, so far as I can tell. Maybe more important, both are fraught with risk. You might trade guys like Ortiz or Cowers or Stowers and they become stars elsewhere, while the front-line pitcher you traded for or signed gets hurt after a season or just loses effectiveness well before his contract is up. I think Elias is scared to make a high-risk move that might go south and spoil his now-solid reputation. He has to understand that a new owner may bring in a new GM or might have a falling out with current or future ownership, leaving him to look for another GM job. It's also possible that John Angelos wants him to avoid a big move to maximize the options that the next owner will have to build a starting pitching staff.

Maybe that's too pessimistic, and Elias will make a big move or two shortly after John Angelos has that meeting in which he shares ownership and financial information with the media.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't follow.

You still don't learn to hit ML pitching in the minors.

You where you continued argument fails on merit? Actually, a lot of Triple-A pitchers do have major league stuff. They may lack command or consistency, or make too many mistakes in the middle of the plate, but it's not like the pitching is awful there. 

And besides, you are not supposed to be developing at the major league level if the team believes they are a contender. I'm not ready to say Gunnar needs to go back to the minors yet, but we're probably a week or two from him needing to improve or he may be sent back for a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I'm kinda under the assumption that it's gonna be a while. He looked really bad the first time and the team is performing without him. No reason to rush.
    • Well I hope Rubenstein knew that when he purchased the team.  
    • I don’t know. Heading into this season, I said I didn’t feel Gunnar’s defense at SS was so good that we should just assume Holliday doesn’t end up there.    Holliday does need to work on his arm strength and my assumption was always that he would. Now, maybe that assumption is wrong, I don’t know but at his age and time in development and the size of Gunnar, I still felt Holliday at SS and Gunnar at third would be the best total defensive lineup long term.  That doesn’t necessarily mean Holliday would be the better SS but that the combo of the 2 would be the best alignment (this also thinking Gunnar would be GG level at third but not SS) This year, I feel Gunnar has looked similar at SS although OAA likes him a lot more this year than last but stats like UZR and UZR/150 don’t. He is 36th in MLb in DRS and 6th at SS (4th in AL).  I was actually surprised to see his arm is “only” in the 77th percentile.     I can see Gunnar being a high OAA guy because I think his athleticism will simply allow him to make plays most players can’t. I think it’s fair to say that Gunnar is an above average defensive SS but how far above average is he and is he truly an elite defender at SS?  I don’t think so but maybe he can develop into one?  I feel confident he would be at third. I have said for a while that all the defensive alignment stuff will be wrapped around where Holliday and Gunnar end up. For now, it seems obvious Holliday isnt a SS option this year unless an injury occurs.    As to how that could change, I think it depends on Holliday. I still seriously doubt he ends up in CF. It’s not like he would be the first converted SS to end up out there and that’s arguably a more premium position than SS in todays game because of all the FB pitchers but it would still surprise me to see that be the long term move. I also think we are overlooking the Westburg factor here. They may believe, even with the arm not being overly strong, that he is the third baseman of the future.  Saying that, I have never doubted that Mayo could stick at third. I believe he can. I just didn’t believe it would happen here and I still don’t.   I still think he ends primarily at RF and first base.
    • I remember last year against St Louis was incredibly frustrating.  They won the first game 1-0 in a game started by Drew Rom, who we had traded over to them.  Then the second game, the corpse of Adam Wainwright shut us down.  He was throwing junk up there and stymied us for 5 innings.  We won the third 11-5 but we were almost 30 games better than them win wise and I remember thinking 2 out of 3 should be minimum we took all things considered.  Hopefully we pay them back this year with a sweep.  Would like Gibby to have a nice year with a huge blemish due to us in Game 3.  9 runs sounds about right.  
    • Certainly the one who’s putting himself out there the most.   
    • 1. Mayo’s defense at 3B has improved.  Not saying it’s even average but maybe. 2. Mullins slumps are scary and even if he rebounds he’s not here long term. 3. Mateo (I know! I know!) is impersonating a ML hitter, with GG caliber defense and game changing speed.  
    • I think there are some similarities. In this day and age, cops can pretty much lateral to any dept in the country due to shortages everywhere. The guys you work with can be stand-up dudes, it's command staff that usually makes the job suck for its officers, and much like a clubhouse you can have a bad squad. Burnes won't have 30 options during the offseason, I suspect. He probably has 5 or 6 teams who would possibly pay what he's asking for. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...