Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

If they don’t sign Baumeister at this point you’d have to think they had a miscommunication on his number before the draft or his camp changed it.  I have to believe they had an idea what it would take before they selected him and have that amount available to offer.   It’s either just last minute playing chicken to the deadline on the actual bonus amount or trying to get Baumeister plus one or both of Folet and Ritchie into the fold as well.

I’ll be happy to just get Baumeister signed at whatever it takes but definitely a little icing on the cake with the other two.

I think it’s probably a matter of Baumeister knows he has the leverage to go back to school if he wants, so his agent is probably going to drag this out until the last day to see if the O’s are willing to give him his number, but ultimately, I can’t see him not signing unless something came up on the physical like it did with McLean last year.  
 

There’s no doubt that Baumeister is going to need an overslot deal to sign, it’s just a matter of how much overslot it’s going to take while also giving the O’s a chance to sign either Forret or Ritchie (or both).  I’m sure the O’s are trying to manage the bonus enough to get all 3 of them signed, but when push comes to shove, it’s most important to get Baumeister signed and then hope you have enough to sign at least 1 of the other 2.  I would hope that all 3 of them have taken physicals already, so that if/when an agreement is reached with Baumeister, they can quickly get deals finalized with at least one of the other 2 by the signing deadline and not have to worry about them having them take physicals before it can become official.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2023 at 8:23 AM, RZNJ said:

Btw, interesting that the Orioles announced signing their top ten rounds signings absent Baumeister but conveniently omit the bonuses of the underslots in 8 and 9, and the 10th rounder Etzel.    Something tells me they don’t want Baumeisters camp to know what their spending limit is.

Saw that as well. These last signings are always a little tricky and take time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

Saw that as well. These last signings are always a little tricky and take time.

Understood but very few teams still have unsigned picks in the top 5 rounds.  I think there are only 3-4 in that category and we have one of them.  I’d pretty shocked if they don’t sign Baumeister.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be quite surprised if Baumeister doesn't get done.  He would be coming into an organization that is definitely on the rise and also seems weak at his position.  If I were a high school infielder, for example, I could see being reluctant to sign for anything but top dollar since it looks like a lot of the positions are blocked.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baltfan said:

I would be quite surprised if Baumeister doesn't get done.  He would be coming into an organization that is definitely on the rise and also seems weak at his position.  If I were a high school infielder, for example, I could see being reluctant to sign for anything but top dollar since it looks like a lot of the positions are blocked.  

If I were a high school infielder and I wasn't hell-bent on going to college, there's not another organization I'd want to go to right now. They will develop him as well as any other org. You worry about your ML status once you're good enough to make it there, and the O's are the team to go to for that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LookinUp said:

If I were a high school infielder and I wasn't hell-bent on going to college, there's not another organization I'd want to go to right now. They will develop him as well as any other org. You worry about your ML status once you're good enough to make it there, and the O's are the team to go to for that.

You can use that logic, but all of these guys think that they will succeed.  They are most concerned about getting unfairly blocked and being in the minors longer than they should.  I am not saying the calculus is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, baltfan said:

You can use that logic, but all of these guys think that they will succeed.  They are most concerned about getting unfairly blocked and being in the minors longer than they should.  I am not saying the calculus is correct.

I think it's a fair concern. Just look at Joey Ortiz right now.

That said, after watching this org for 20+ years before Elias, I personally value going to a better org than just looking for a clear path. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the deadline is 5 PM tomorrow (7/25) correct? Is it unusual for a Baumeister-like signing to go down to the wire with no news or speculation? Another 4 yr SO pitcher at pick 61 went for +$200K over slot ($1.5/1.3M). The only guys getting big plus ups as the HS pitchers at 71-72 (WAS-OAK) getting  $2.6M and 3.0M versus slot of $1M. Does he really have that much leverage being picked at 63 vs ranked at 167?

Edited by AnythingO's
correction
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most high school players not named Jackson Holliday are going to take a minimum of 4 years in the minors.   Many more will take 5-7 years.   Worry about which ML player has your current position blocked is a fool’s errand.     If you’re good, you’ll play somewhere, for some team.   Take the money and play if you so choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Callis

@jimcallisMLB

·

59m

As of now, the max teams can pay @MLBDraft top-10-rders if they go to full 5% overage. Deadline: 5 pm ET. W. Jenkins, Min 1st: $7,861,480 J. Baumeister, Bal supp 2nd: $2,431,840 J. Wiggins, ChC supp 2nd: $1,401,600 M. Ahuna, SF 4th: $601,720 D. Campbell, LAD supp 4th: $602,830
 

No way Baumeister turns down that or he would have already declared that he was going back to school.   O’s certainly don’t want to give him all of it.   Going down to the wire.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Jim Callis

@jimcallisMLB

·

59m

As of now, the max teams can pay @MLBDraft top-10-rders if they go to full 5% overage. Deadline: 5 pm ET. W. Jenkins, Min 1st: $7,861,480 J. Baumeister, Bal supp 2nd: $2,431,840 J. Wiggins, ChC supp 2nd: $1,401,600 M. Ahuna, SF 4th: $601,720 D. Campbell, LAD supp 4th: $602,830
 

No way Baumeister turns down that or he would have already declared that he was going back to school.   O’s certainly don’t want to give him all of it.   Going down to the wire.

 

$2.4m is back of 1st round/comp round money.  I think the odds of signing for less than the $1.5m fellow sophomore pitcher Tredwell signed for is thin though.

It would unfairly raise the bar for my expectations for him if he takes it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

$2.4m is back of 1st round/comp round money.  I think the odds of signing for less than the $1.5m fellow sophomore pitcher Tredwell signed for is thin though.

It would unfairly raise the bar for my expectations for him if he takes it all.

Baumeister’s agent is probably telling the Orioles that he thinks his client can improve his stock and get late 1st-early 2nd round money if he goes back to school, and holding out for that kind of money now in order to eschew the chance to prove it.  But when push comes to shove, I can’t see them walking away from any offer of at least $1.4-1.5M, since all it takes is an injury or poor performance to kill his value if he goes back to school (plus he’ll be 22 years old with less leverage next year).  I think his agent just wants to make the O’s sweat a little bit to get the most money they can before he agrees to terms.  Deadlines usually get deals done, so I think it happens unless he failed a physical, in which case we likely will find out about it eventually if he doesn’t sign (similar to what happened with Nolan McLean last year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, Baumeister.  We offered over 2M and you said no.  So we just gave 300K of our extra money to Forret.  You can sign now for 2.1M or another 500K goes to Ritchie and you’ll get a take it or leave it 1.6M offer to decide by 5.   The first domino just fell.  O’s make the first move.  Starting to have doubts that Baumeister gets done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I mean imagine having Burnes for 1 single year, and your only other move is Kimbrel. In hindsight it seems pretty ridiculous. 
    • I'd pitch Tate or Akin over Cano, even Perez or Baker, probably.
    • I agree with the OP. Elias seems to have wildly miscalculated his bullpen and overall pitching staff. Bradish and Means should not have been factored into the equation at all given their injuries, and counting on Wells was suspect as well.  He didn't find this year's Danny Coulombe or Cano. No magical waiver claims or trade finds to speak of this year.  Way too much reliance on guys like Perez and Webb, and even Cano, who he should have figured would regress.  Just a lack of action with regards to the pitching. He made two pitching moves in the offseason and 0 that have worked out  so far during the season (the various waiver claims and minor league deals).  What are we doing here exactly? 
    • If "all in" means there's a legit chance to win a championship... this is "an" all in year, but it certainly won't be the only one.  Elias is not going to sell off half the farm out of desperation, nor should he.   He really needs to add more pitching though, which we all know and which has been true since the beginning of last season.  It will be true next year and probably every year.  In this regard, I'm not thrilled with his efforts to date but there's another huge opportunity in front of him right now.  The Orioles really have to start developing and paying for more pitching going forward because the bats are here and ready.
    • IMO, this off season is a time for Rubinstein to prove himself as much as Elias. An owner doesn't make trades and if you are talking about taking on big contracts - takes two to tango. I'm not using this trade delined as an indicator for new ownership, but I am anxious to see how next year's budget/payroll plays out.
    • It's low hanging fruit to laugh at the doom-and-gloom crowd, the sky-is-falling Chicken Littles, and the run-for-the-hills Billies.  So, fruit duly plucked. 🤣 However, there is some truth within their pessimistic outlook.  It's absolutely fair to be concerned about our pitching.  Who's to say who is right or wrong in how much concern there should be?  Well, we all have a say.  It's why we're here.  The beloved @Roy Firestone is admittedly the most pessimistic Game Thread poster in history, yet no one questions his love of the O's.  Nor should we berate those with strongly pessimistic views about our chances as being less of a fan.   It's just my two cents, but I think it's readily apparent that we need to add to our pitching and I believe Elias will address it.  A quality starter and a reliever or two would likely do wonders for the team... and our collective sanity.   I just don't feel we'd need to deal Holliday, or Mayo, or Basallo to get there.  Then again, I may be wrong.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...