Jump to content

Looks like the Rays are finally getting a new stadium


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

Crazy..........having lived in that area they have to realize their fanbase is in Tampa not St Pete and study after study specifically on that franchise shows they draw significantly higher on weekends not weekdays because of the drive.  The most desirable demographic is simply not willing to drive more than 30m on a weeknight, very different concept than the Braves who looked at those studies and decided to build closer to their fan base. 

It will no doubt draw as a novelty but long term I question whether it puts more weekday fans in the seats which is where their real opportunity exists.  It truly is an awful stadium experience but living 30-40 minutes south of the stadium (like 25% of their base) you would have no clue the Rays  even exist, there is far more support for the Lightning than the Rays.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

What we know so far about the renovated stadium is this: the stadium is expected to have a maximum capacity of 30,000 people, will have a fixed dome roof, and will feature artificial turf. It will be built in downtown St. Petersburg as part of the redevelopment of the city's Historic Gas Plant District.

OK aren't these are the same issues that people claim is reason for Tampa's troubles in their home park currently? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they expecting to build a train from central Tampa to St. Pete or something? 

I mean, yes, the Trop was a horrendous stadium to watch games, but the main driver for their low attendance is the location being too far from Tampa.  Building a new stadium a third of a mile away from the Trop isn't really going to solve this.  🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having recently been down there and driven around the Tampa/St. Pete area, my son is considering University of Tampa, I am surprised they want to build it on the St. Pete side. The area around downtown Tampa seems much better suited for a stadium and the community that forms around it. The area around U Tampa is really nice. The didn't find the St. Pete side to be as exciting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2023 at 3:10 PM, Aglets said:

So they are going to build another domed stadium in St. Pete just like the Trop and hope that people choose to come there instead because...........why exactly?

They have no choice but to have a dome given the heat down there.  But they can build a domed stadium that is more appealing than the Trop inside.  Not sure if the dome will be retractable, but maybe.
 

St. Pete is a really nice city and the location will be nice from the standpoint of having things to do before and after the game.  But it certainly won’t solve the problem that the people in Tampa and its suburbs won’t want to fight the traffic to get there on weeknights.  

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They have no choice but to have a dome given the heat down there.  St. Pete is a really nice city and the location will be nice from the standpoint of having things to do before and after the game.  But it certainly won’t solve the problem that the people in Tampa and its suburbs won’t want to fight the traffic to get there on weeknights.  

Yeah I don't care about the dome so much.........my incredulity is more from the standpoint of:

When the common consensus seems to be that no one comes to see the Rays at the Trop because of traffic concerns and its poor location relative to where people actually are.............. why are they spending $1.2B to put a new stadium in that same location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Yeah I don't care about the dome so much.........my incredulity is more from the standpoint of:

When the common consensus seems to be that no one comes to see the Rays at the Trop because of traffic concerns and its poor location relative to where people actually are.............. why are they spending $1.2B to put a new stadium in that same location?

I don’t know all the ins and outs, but I have the impression that they simply haven’t been able to find a suitable site and economic package on the Tampa side of the bay.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stadium announcement was made despite the following:  

-They are planning to build in the same difficult to access location

-They don’t have financing yet although they say ownership's $700m contribution is not an issue?? And JA is bitching about payroll..........

-There have not been any votes by the two government bodies that make the final decisions.

-Ownership is quoted as saying "they will draw more fans because the population of St Petersburg is growing.  St Petersburg is not growing much (3,400 in 5 years-that's right 700 people a year!!) and Pinellas County has had a population drop over the last 5 years.

-The development around the park will start when the park is completed and take 20 years.    

-in Tampa 2/3 or more of the 3.2 million people in the Tampa Bay metro area live an hour from Tropicana Field. By building in St Petersburg they are limiting a 30 minute radius to about 600k people.  MLB studies show draw is significantly impacted by more than a 30m drive, I believe Rays disparity between weekend and weekday games is the most pronounced in MLB.

Note:  If they were to build in the Ybor City neighborhood of Tampa the commute would be juxtaposed in that to 2/3 of the population of the area that live within 30 minutes-unfortunately politics intervened. 

The problem remains where the stadium is to be built.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

They have no choice but to have a dome given the heat down there.  But they can build a domed stadium that is more appealing than the Trop inside.  Not sure if the dome will be retractable, but maybe.
 

St. Pete is a really nice city and the location will be nice from the standpoint of having things to do before and after the game.  But it certainly won’t solve the problem that the people in Tampa and its suburbs won’t want to fight the traffic to get there on weeknights.  

August/September is the rainy season in Tampa so you get "pop up" thunderstorms most days so the stadium needs to be covered.  Not just for the game logistics, as a fan I can remember getting soaked on the long walk to the stadium then sitting in wet clothes in an air conditioned stadium, never again.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • First, Kids 2 and under are free no matter what.   Second, Kids 9 and under are free - you just have to get tickets in certain sections with a paid adult ticket.  Usually, they run about $17 per ticket.  So, a family of 4 going to the game would be $34.00.  Thats not that bad at all. The Orioles also do a lot of ticketing strategies / plans to make it affordable IF you do plan on attending 4+ games in a season.  Sometimes you just have to do it before the season starts. What I don't like - is that every year the concessions cost more $$$, the portions get smaller, and the parking fee's increase.  I remember back in 2014/2017 you could go get a pretzel for $5.00.  It was decent size and now of course - its like $7.50 and they changed the shape to a small "O"....  All of that is getting out of control.
    • I love Holliday’s talent. I truly do. But I am rooting for all of the players that don the Orange & Black. I don’t see a need to turn them into rivals or competitors. They are all representing or are going to represent the same franchise. Mayo is not a better 3B than Westburg. He just isn’t and it’s not all that close. But Mayo’s bat could help us at some point this year, especially given that he hits from the right side.  In your opinion, if Mayo were to come up and find success offensively right away (which is a rarity in the current game of baseball) but struggles defensively, (which is very possibility given his short comings at 3B) what would you do? Or what if he struggles offensively like so many of our prospects have done, then what do you do?  Last scenario, if he does great on both sides of the ball, what do you do with Holliday for the rest of this season and long term?
    • He’s an amazing talent.  Im Not doubting that. I’m just saying, let’s pump the brakes a little on him until we see him over a larger sample size.
    • Funny you say that AFTER the bullpen completely shut down the Yankees. They were dominant in the most important series so far and will only get better once Wells and Grayson come back. Irvin will be in the bullpen and possibly Means. It's a marathon, not a sprint, and I think the Orioles will continue to add games to their lead over the long haul - they are just better IMO.
    • I agree it is too early to put him over Witt and Henderson based on performance to date, but he merits keeping an eye on. Remember, that Witt had his struggles his first season as well.  Just looking at OPS+ as an indicator of offense, Witt went from 102 as a rookie to 118 in his 2nd full season and is 158 so far in 2024. Gunnar went from 126 in a brief 2022 to 125 as a rookie and is 165 so far in 2024. De La Cruz was at only 89 over 98 games last year, but is 171 over the early season. All 3 are in the top 10 for WAR this year, although admittedly it is still quite early in the year.
    • How far south of 104 MPH is your fastball? 
    • The question shouldn’t be, who gets here first. The question should be, how do we get them both here and play them enough where it’s worth it?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...