Jump to content

Cowser vs Kjerstad revisited

Sports Guy

By Sports Guy
in Orioles Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

Just Regular Hangout Grand Counsel

Just Regular

Posted
Posted

Its almost hard to find a contrast, especially given the near identical starting point of draft pool dollars conferred by Mike Elias.

One would be Kjerstad played the SEC while Cowser's college was a smaller school.

To lean into a shtick, if the SEC doesn't have recruiting tabs on you around when you can get a learner's permit, you might not be in Tier 1.

Elias' overall assessments have been good enough my starting expectation for EBJ is about 20% less valuable than Kjerstad/Cowser as that's what the money suggests.

I do mentally subdivide high school and college for that - even though Gunnar/Mayo only got ~$2mm to start, from age 18-21 they played their way up the ladder to an extent I don't think many college guys have the capability to.      Once the Sigbot gets your 18-21 data, it can weigh and measure you even more precisely.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Tony-OH
Tony-OH

At some point, Elias is going to need to need to focus on what's best for the team in 2024. He certainly does not want to just give top prospects away, but prospects are commodities that should ultima

wse120372
wse120372

I think there is still some meat on the bone with developing HK. He missed so much time with some serious health issues. I'll be watching him intently this spring. Personally I think he hits another g

Jim'sKid26
Jim'sKid26

So if we look at tools, acknowledging that Cowser is a year younger, we get the following from @Tony-OH: Cowser: Tools (current/future value) Hit: 45/55 Game Power: 45/50 Raw Power: 50/55

Posted Images

oriole Veteran All-Star

oriole

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, deward said:

As you said, they aren't going to get that, so at some point they'll have to decide if they're willing to accept one of the packages that is actually on the table. I'd offer Ortiz/Norby (or Stowers)/Povich and sit back and wait to see if anyone tops it. My understanding is that the WS want pitching more than anything, which could be a problem.

 

I think the package you’re suggesting is very far fetched. There are 28 teams out there that can, and would, beat that with ease. You will need at least one of our top 5. My point was that the WS would want more than one of our top 5 and likely someone in top 6-10 in addition.

 

Id offer something like Cowser, Kremer, and someone between our 10-20 and let them say no and then move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HakunaSakata Major Leaguer Rising Star

HakunaSakata

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, deward said:

As you said, they aren't going to get that, so at some point they'll have to decide if they're willing to accept one of the packages that is actually on the table. I'd offer Ortiz/Norby (or Stowers)/Povich and sit back and wait to see if anyone tops it. My understanding is that the WS want pitching more than anything, which could be a problem.

As for the original question, I still value HK's power as the best carrying tool between him and Cowser, but I like both and value them roughly equally. I don't think I'd trade six years of either for Cease (although I'd have to consider a one-for-one swap). My preference would be to see the team transition both into the lineup in place of Hays and O'Hearn.

There's really no scenario where trading young pitching makes any sense for this team given the lack of depth we have at that position. Giving up someone like Povich should be a deal breaker unless we're getting a young controllable arm in return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deward Major Leaguer Rising Star

deward

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, oriole said:

I think the package you’re suggesting is very far fetched. There are 28 teams out there that can, and would, beat that with ease. You will need at least one of our top 5. My point was that the WS would want more than one of our top 5 and likely someone in top 6-10 in addition.

 

Id offer something like Cowser, Kremer, and someone between our 10-20 and let them say no and then move on. 

Two starting infielders (one of whom is the #50 prospect in MLB per MLB.com) and a potential replacement in the rotation? If teams were willing to beat that with ease, it would have already happened. It's a very fair offer for two years of a guy who didn't pitch like he belonged at the top of a rotation last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sydnor Major Leaguer Cup of Coffee

Sydnor

Posted
Posted

My non-scout opinion based on seeing them both in Norfolk several times this year:

Cowser has elite plate discipline/swing decisions. I wish he had gotten more opportunity because I think he needs to find the balance between aggressiveness and waiting for the pitch he can drive. I know he looked rough defensively, and I criticized him for it, but I think he can handle left in Camden. 

Kjerstad doesn’t have the same plate discipline/swing decisions, but seems to swing a miss a bit less. I’m not convinced he would be as good a defender as Santander in right because Tony gets excellent jumps, and I didn’t see that out of Kjerstad. 

I think they are both going to be good players. Kjerstad coming back from his health issues is tremendous. If I had to pick one, I’d keep Cowser because of his swing decisions and defense, but I completely understand why others my prefer Kjerstad.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tony-OH Hangout Grand Counsel

Tony-OH

Posted
Posted

I ranked Kjerstad above Cowser but I'll be honest, I could have built a case either way. Cowser's defensive edge, including a much better arm, really is what makes him stand out. Unfortunately, the concerns about him hitting velocity in the minor leagues was highlighted during his major league time. 

Cowser has a solid floor as a 4th outfielder while Kjerstad has a floor of a Ryan O'Hearn type. Both have considerably higher ceilings and solid "most likely" as regular everyday outfielders. The Orioles could do a lot worse than Cowser in LF and Kjerstad in RF one day.

If I had to trade one, man it's close, but my concerns over Cowser hitting velocity and left handed breaking pitches probably means I send him off first.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oriole Veteran All-Star

oriole

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, deward said:

Two starting infielders (one of whom is the #50 prospect in MLB per MLB.com) and a potential replacement in the rotation? If teams were willing to beat that with ease, it would have already happened. It's a very fair offer for two years of a guy who didn't pitch like he belonged at the top of a rotation last year.

Gonna have to agree to disagree on that one I suppose. I’m sure better packages have been proposed but the White Sox have said no. Cease is hardly worth going after IMO just based on how much  the White Sox seem to think he’s worth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, oriole said:

Gonna have to agree to disagree on that one I suppose. I’m sure better packages have been proposed but the White Sox have said no. Cease is hardly worth going after IMO just based on how much  the White Sox seem to think he’s worth. 

You go after him until it’s absolutely clear there’s a better option.  The fact that the White Sox have been stubborn so far doesn’t mean they won’t change course when spring training draws close and nothing better has come along.  

Back in my litigator days, I had many cases where the parties were far apart in settlement talks for months but suddenly reached a deal when the trial was imminent.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
spiritof66 Hangout Grand Counsel

spiritof66

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, rudyrooster said:

I like both players.  I just can't see trading a #2 overall pick (Kjerstad) when he's just breaking into the majors.  His bat seems "tailor made" for that short right porch at Camden Yards.  I also think he could play a serviceable defense in right field.  Just my opinion.

For me, that's the question: will Kjerstad be good enough defensively to be an everyday player in the OF? From what little I've seen of him, I have doubts. I hope he can get enough playing time to dispel those doubts by June.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I would keep them both and the WS can keep Cease.

I would prefer to trade one (and some lesser pieces) if it will get us Cease or someone better.   However, it will be okay with me if that doesn’t happen IF we figure out a way to get each of them 400+ at bats in the majors next year and see what they can do.  But I’ll be annoyed if we keep them both and they spend 80% of the year in the minors or sitting on the bench.   

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Roy Firestone
      5 losses in a row. Baltimore...we have a problem. Thread revisit...O's have no way to win the WS unless...

      By Roy Firestone · Posted

      I believe this is truly the "all in " year...not next year or the year after. After this year, it's conceivable we could lose Burnes, and Santander, and that would mean two of the best and(among) the most important players on the team. No Burnes(he'll command at least 30 million a year and likely more) would maybe give us ONE solid pitcher in Grod, and our outfield will be in flux. No, I think THIS is the year the Orioles have to win, and that means some dramatic, possibly risky trades at the break yield some significant upgrades to our beleaguered pitching both with starters and the pen. If we don't get it this year, we may never have a potential post season team in the next couple of years..not at this rate.
    • RZNJ
      Keith Law has O's taking Tommy White at #22 in latest mock draft

      By RZNJ · Posted

      Luke Dickerson, SS, Morris Knolls HS, Rockaway, N.J. There are shades of Jackson Merrill and Sammy Stafura with Dickerson as a northeast/mid-atlantic prep shortstop who has received a lot of late helium this spring. He’s an offense-oriented righthanded hitter with a background as a talented hockey player. He might fit better at second base or center field, but teams like his hit/power combination enough to take him inside the first two rounds. He had a solid showing at the draft combine last week, as well. 
    • terpoh
      The 2024 Trade Deadline

      By terpoh · Posted

      As the bluejays continue to fade, I cant help but think that they would be a trade fit if they decide to sell.  Specifically Gausman and Berrios. Gausman is under contract for 2 seasons after this one, and Berrios has 4 years with an opt out after 2 years. So you would essentially have both of those guys for 2.5 years which would be a big boost for 2024, and the coming years with Burnes likely gone and Bradish out for 2025. They are both on hefty contracts (for Orioles standards) but with our payroll and new ownership group you would think that wouldnt be a huge problem. Not sure what the asking price would be for one of, or both, of those guys but worth looking into. I know its hard to look at trading within the division, especially what would potentially be a "blockbuster" type of  deal but I just dont see a ton of options on the trade market right now outside of the White Sox, A's and Rockies and none of those teams can match what the bluejays have to offer.
    • Safelykept
      Gunnar Henderson 2024

      By Safelykept · Posted

      He was all of that yes, but nothing close to Gunner so far or Cal's best year, and you also forgot about Eddie. not to mention Palmer in the 70,s
    • clapdiddy
      I sort of don't get Elias's plan

      By clapdiddy · Posted

      I don't trust Suarez at all.   He seems to lose command quickly.
    • Safelykept
      I sort of don't get Elias's plan

      By Safelykept · Posted

      He wont
    • milbest77
      I sort of don't get Elias's plan

      By milbest77 · Posted

      I think we have to remember that Johnny Angelos hired Elias and the purpose was to cut payroll. Any halfway competent GM could hit on the Adley pick (or Witt if he went that route). I do give him props for the Gunnar and Westy picks, too. But, go back and watch Elias’ introductory press conference. He said the goal was to build an elite pipeline of talent. At no point were the words “win a World Series” ever uttered. Probably no correlation there, but interesting non-choice of words nonetheless. Elias won my admiration forever by getting rid of Chris Davis. Obviously, we still have to pay him, but just getting him out of the building was gigantic IMO.  I also can’t help but wonder if new ownership wants their own guy. I know Rubenstein has publicly said Elias is the guy, but we don’t know what is going on behind the scenes. Not sure if that is good or bad, but there’s the old saying “a new broom sweeps clean.” 

  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...