Jump to content

Jackson Holliday 2024


btdart20

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Warehouse said:

One thing to note is that Jackson made swing tweaks his first three weeks back in Norfolk but then abandoned them because they “didn’t feel great”.

From this Baltimore Banner article

“Earlier, as he fiddled, Holliday felt he was “surviving” and “didn’t feel great” about where his swing was, even though he produced at the Triple-A level upon his return. That has since changed. Over the last two weeks, particularly, Holliday’s return to the mechanics he’s more familiar with has helped him get back on track.”

His contact rate really dropped off when he reverted back to his familiar mechanics. I worry that he gave up on the changes too soon.

First three weeks back vs. after (includes tracked pitches and non-bunts)

 

PAs   

K%          

wOBA 

xwOBA

whiff %

4/27-5/18

91

19.8%

.366

.349

21.6%

5/19-7/2

118

28.8%

.392

.337

32.1%

 

 

PAs   

EV     

hard hit %

barrel/PA

4/27-5/18

91

89.5

44.4%

4.4%

5/19-7/2

118

89.8

44.6%

4.2%

Like I said the other day, it would be nice to hear from some scouts, the org or whoever about all the walks, lack of power, lack of BA, etc…is he tweaking things? Is the elbow bothering him to where he can’t drive the ball? Is he getting nothing to hit?  
 

I’m surprised someone from the Banner hasn’t gotten into this because it’s obviously a big story and one that should be reported on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Warehouse said:

One thing to note is that Jackson made swing tweaks his first three weeks back in Norfolk but then abandoned them because they “didn’t feel great”.

From this Baltimore Banner article

“Earlier, as he fiddled, Holliday felt he was “surviving” and “didn’t feel great” about where his swing was, even though he produced at the Triple-A level upon his return. That has since changed. Over the last two weeks, particularly, Holliday’s return to the mechanics he’s more familiar with has helped him get back on track.”

His contact rate really dropped off when he reverted back to his familiar mechanics. I worry that he gave up on the changes too soon.

First three weeks back vs. after (includes tracked pitches and non-bunts)

 

PAs   

K%          

wOBA 

xwOBA

whiff %

4/27-5/18

91

19.8%

.366

.349

21.6%

5/19-7/2

118

28.8%

.392

.337

32.1%

 

 

PAs   

EV     

hard hit %

barrel/PA

4/27-5/18

91

89.5

44.4%

4.4%

5/19-7/2

118

89.8

44.6%

4.2%

 

It looks like he's trying to clean up the timing on the leg kick.  Kjerstad has a big leg kick and he didn't whiff 16 times in 30 PAs, so it's not like you can't survive with it.  He's definitely planting earlier now than he did when he was in the big club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hallas said:

 

It looks like he's trying to clean up the timing on the leg kick.  Kjerstad has a big leg kick and he didn't whiff 16 times in 30 PAs, so it's not like you can't survive with it.  He's definitely planting earlier now than he did when he was in the big club.

To that point, one area where Jackson has made some progress is on high velocity.

AAA average whiff % for pitches with velo 95mph or higher= 25.6%.

Jackson Holliday AAA performance vs pitches 95mph or higher

 

pitches

JH Whiff %

Sept 2023

43

38.1

Mar/Apr 2024

23

33.3

May 2024

52

25.0

June 2024

24

20.0

However, his overall whiff rate has consistently been ~27% over the first three months of 2024.  Additionally, about half his batted balls continue to be hit on the ground vs 42% AAA league average. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OriolesUpAndDowns said:

One of the doubles was because of the Durham outfielder laziness and Holiday just took advantage.  Good heads up play.

 

The second walk was against their 3rd string catcher who had to pitch.  

Yeah if he comes to the majors he won’t see a third string catcher.  He might get to see the Yankees backup catcher though like we saw the other night after putting up 15 on them through 8 innings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bpilktree said:

Yeah if he comes to the majors he won’t see a third string catcher.  He might get to see the Yankees backup catcher though like we saw the other night after putting up 15 on them through 8 innings.  

I'm sure he never would have been able to work a second walk of the game off an actual pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Basallo should be put under the same scrutiny.  How many of his HR have been against washed up non prospects.  Questionable whether he can even defensively handle catcher.  It's not just throwing base stealers out.  Basallo struggles to keep his OPS above .900 in AA when Holliday obliterated AA at the same age with an OPS over 1.000.  Basallo is far from untouchable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OriolesMagic83 said:

I feel like Basallo should be put under the same scrutiny.  How many of his HR have been against washed up non prospects.  Questionable whether he can even defensively handle catcher.  It's not just throwing base stealers out.  Basallo struggles to keep his OPS above .900 in AA when Holliday obliterated AA at the same age with an OPS over 1.000.  Basallo is far from untouchable.

Should have said .800 since his OPS is .813.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree, except for the 'gotta find a taker for Urias'.  We should NOT refuse to improve the team just because we can't unload Urias on someone.  Sure, I'd MUCH rather trade him and get some value for him.  But if no one wants him or isn't willing to give us anything for him, I'm not keeping Mayo in the minors just because I'm not willing to cut Urias.  Trade him IF we can, cut him if we must.  But let's get Mayo's bat in the lineup.  
    • I am not sure why the Orioles would make a trade for Luzardo in the next few weeks.  Luzardo has too many question marks regarding his ability to help the Orioles this year.   Any prospects dealt in the next few weeks should for players who can get the Orioles win the World Series this year.  If they strengthen the Orioles for 2025 and beyond, great.   If the Marlins will give up Luzardo for pennies on the dollar, then go get him.  
    • I think I may. When I originally made this post, I honestly didn’t realize he wasn’t going to be back until mid to late August. That really hurts the time frame for him to get his value up for the offseason. I mean, it could get higher imo, I’m not doubting that. But if it was at peak in the offseason and he’s 70 cents on the dollar now, how much will it go up after making 6-8 more starts? 80 cents on the dollar?  Does that increase warrant keeping him and risking that it doesn’t drop more? I don’t think the deal I offered is a slap in the face offer but I do think it’s an offer that has good but not great upside. How much you believe in Stowers and Norby obviously matters here. However, it gives them good depth, immediate ML help and several years of control.    But I could definitely see Miami wanting a better headliner and less quantity..I’m just doubtful they can get that unless they hold onto him for another year and hope he stays healthy and performs well. If he does, he can make back that trade value at that time. But, as we saw with cease, sometimes the risk just isn’t worth it and you have to take the best deal you can.  
    • We know the real answer.  Let’s see if we get it.  Lol
    • Those guys would cost who else, whos the headliner
    • Right.  SG wants to get a bargain.  Even if Luzardo’s arm falls off after the trade, he didn’t give up one player it hurts to part with.      No reason for the Marlins to sell low unless they think Luzardo never bounces back close to the 2023 level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...