Jump to content

2024 Ongoing Lineup Thread


spleen1015

Recommended Posts

Just now, deward said:

 

A couple of surprises there. I'm glad HK is getting a start today, but surprised that it's in LF at home. Either way, glad is getting in. I also thought it would have been a good opportunity to get Urias in against a righty in place of Mateo. Still, that's a decent lineup today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Means is an extreme fly ball pitcher, so having Kjerstad in LF at home is showing a lot of confidence in his ability out there, and in Cowser’s ability in CF. 

Cowser’s numbers in LF are very good this year (he’s already +4 OAA) so I’m glad to see him get some more CF opportunity.

Kjerstad needs the playing time and if they are willing to go with this alignment in the most extreme scenario testing Kjerstad's defense (Means, at home, Mullins off day), that provides a lot more flexibility for getting him in there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Kjerstad can make or break his case for more playing time today.  Big test defensively.  If he and Cowser look good it certainly opens up this alignment for the near future and even longer term.  Fingers crossed.

Note to both players.  Just hit the cutoff man and throw to 2B to hold the runner at 1B instead of attempting the impossible play at home plate.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

We’ll be lucky if Kjerstad looks as good in left as Gurriel did last night trying to catch that shot from Cowser. It’ll be a circus. 

Here’s your big chance, a Cowser failure in CF and a Kjerstad failure in LF and you’ll have I told you so’s in two threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I hope they’re reading the OH and take your note to heart. 

Haha.  That was more of a note to other Hangouters detailing what I hope happens.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, George Zuverink said:

Here’s your big chance, a Cowser failure in CF and a Kjerstad failure in LF and you’ll have I told you so’s in two threads.

What is your problem?  That’s two posts from you talking about me throwing out an I told you so. I’ve made a lot of posts here, and I defy you to find a single one where I’ve said I told you so to anyone about anything. If you don’t think this board will go nuts if Kjerstad or Cowser misplays a fly ball or doesn’t get to one that it’s perceived a good OF would have, then o don’t know what to tell you. 
 

It’s a criticism of the board/posters. Not the players. And it’s certainly not me rooting against the players playing for the team I’ve rooted for my whole life. 
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Most supposedly obvious mistakes are not really. They're choices based on a bunch of different information, including things fans don't generally know like who's available today, who's nursing a whatever that makes him semi-unavailable, who spent the night on the can after bad crab cake... Hyde has to manage the clubhouse and personalities, and getting the bench guys some kind of playing time, and getting through 162 games, and on and on. 95% of "obvious mistakes" are going to have a plausible reason why they were made that doesn't involve the manager being stupid or spacing out. And every manager has any number of decisions that some subset of fans will decry as an obvious mistake, so the baseline for whatever manager we're talking about isn't zero mistakes, it's the number that a typical MLB manager supposedly makes. I'll give you a big wad of cash if you can find me a fanbase in any sport that thinks their manager is brilliant all the time. The best you're going to get is "eh, at least he hasn't screwed anything up in a week or two."
    • I'm certain that Texas is embarrassed to have the 2023 Wildcard banner right next to the 2023 World Series Champion banner.
    • In terms on banners: 1. World Series 2. American League 3. AL East So, if we don't at least win the AL, winning the division is extremely important. Nobody wants a stupid Wild Card banner. In fact, everyone should find those embarrassing to display.
    • His swing looks a little long.  Probably why he had so many K’s but good power at Norfolk.   I see lots of K’s in the short term but hopefully he runs into a few.  
    • I’ve just been looking at payroll construction for other teams with payrolls higher than the Orioles but not upper tier.  There are 6 teams between $128 - 172 mm that I consider in this comp group.  Those are nos. 11-16 in total payroll.  There’s a fairly big leap to no. 10 ($208 mm) and I doubt that’s realistic for the O’s unless Rubinstein just feels like heavily subsidizing his ballclub, which I doubt.   Anyway, what stands out to me about these six clubs is that none of them have more than two players making in excess of $20 mm this year.  Here’s how they break down: STL ($172 mm): Arenado $35 mm, Goldschmidt $26 mm, 2 between $15-20 mm, 4 between $10-15 mm. BOS ($168 mm): Devers $29.5 mm, Story $22.5 mm, 3 at $15-20 mm. LAA ($151 mm): Rendon $38.6 mm, Trout $37.1 mm, 2 between $10-15 mm. SDP ($145 mm): Bogaerts $25.5 mm, Musgrove $20 mm, 2 between $15-20 mm, 3 between $10-15 mm.  (Manny’s contract is heavily backloaded.) AZD ($143 mm): Montgomery $25 mm, 6 between $10-15 mm. COL($128 mm): Bryant $28 mm, 5 between $10–15 mm. So when you think about 2029,  it would be very difficult to pay all four of Burnes, Adley, Gunnar and Bradish at FA prices.   At that point you’ve also potentially got Grayson, Westburg and Cowser in Arb 3, and maybe Holliday, Kjerstad and Mayo in Arb 1 or 2.    Bottom line, we won’t be able to sign all these guys long term, and choices will have to be made.  Starting with Burnes this winter.   I wonder how he’d feel about a front loaded deal with opt outs.   
    • https://www.mlb.com/orioles/video/yennier-cano-in-play-out-s-to-vladimir-guerrero-jr-js6cw3?partnerId=web_video-playback-page_video-share   This was a great play! 1.085 OPS over the past 28 days for Ramon.
    • I think that over the long term there is absolutely a better chance of winning if you get to skip the first round of playoffs. It's simple probability. If you have a 60% chance at winning any given post-season series, you have a .6^3 = 22% chance of winning three straight series, and a 13% chance of winning four straight series. Of course in any single post-season or series there's a reasonable chance that the wildcard wins and the division winner loses. But over 10, 20, 30 years you will almost certainly see an advantage from skipping the wildcard series. It's like asking if you'd rather be a .320 hitter or a .270 hitter? Obviously .320, even though next week the .270 hitter might get more hits.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...