Jump to content

Cade Povich 2024


emmett16

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, HuskerFan said:

 

Internet Billy Beane,  you're so wrong it's beyond the point of pathetic.   Povich is proving you wrong. Several times.  

As for the rest of your drivel, the meltdown is beautiful.  You don't know squat, that's for certain with every reply.  

Holt & Ramsey > internet Billy Beane.  

Tell me what I’m wrong about.

In MLB, the average str% is 63.8%. You were lauding him because up until the last 4 batters, he was at 60%…and that was with him likely getting hitters to swing at pitches that MLers won’t.

So, yea that’s not great. He can’t win and pitch well at that level of throwing strikes.

So, tell me where I’m wrong. You think he will be a successful ML starter throwing strikes at a below average rate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Tell me what I’m wrong about.

In MLB, the average str% is 63.8%. You were lauding him because up until the last 4 batters, he was at 60%…and that was with him likely getting hitters to swing at pitches that MLers won’t.

So, yea that’s not great. He can’t win and pitch well at that level of throwing strikes.

So, tell me where I’m wrong. You think he will be a successful ML starter throwing strikes at a below average rate?

Did you watch any of the game?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Tell me what I’m wrong about.

In MLB, the average str% is 63.8%. You were lauding him because up until the last 4 batters, he was at 60%…and that was with him likely getting hitters to swing at pitches that MLers won’t.

So, yea that’s not great. He can’t win and pitch well at that level of throwing strikes.

So, tell me where I’m wrong. You think he will be a successful ML starter throwing strikes at a below average rate?

I already have.  

I wasn't lauding him.  I added context to his really good outing, it's this simple. Click here for assistance.  You bypass 4 days rest in April, first front/back starts of a series of the season and where he was at a certain point in the game.  Late in the outing.   I acknowledge 55% won't cut it.  60% will though, throwing Tuesday/Sunday, IN APRIL.

There isn't a AAA pitching coach, minor league pitching director & MLB pitching coach that wouldn't take those results in week one.  

You're really struggling with the basics.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HuskerFan said:

I already have.  

I wasn't lauding him.  I added context to his really good outing, it's this simple. Click here for assistance.  You bypass 4 days rest in April, first front/back starts of a series of the season and where he was at a certain point in the game.  Late in the outing.   I acknowledge 55% won't cut it.  60% will though, throwing Tuesday/Sunday, IN APRIL.

There isn't a AAA pitching coach, minor league pitching director & MLB pitching coach that wouldn't take those results in week one.  

You're really struggling with the basics.  

And you’re really struggling with my actual argument.  
 

I never said he pitched bad. I never said to not be happy about it. All I said is that he has to throw more strikes.  But since you are so completely over the top about him, you can’t take any level of critique that isn’t over the top praise.

I don’t care about the context. I don’t care about any of the over the top bs you are trying to make up. 
 

I prefer McDermott. In his first start, he didn’t let up any runs and only allowed a few hits and struck out 6..but I was critical of the walks and lack of strikes.

I don’t give 2 fooks that it’s early. Not throwing strikes isn’t a good thing. It doesn’t mean there aren’t reasons for it. Bad weather, poor umpiring, etc…for any given start, these things are factors but this is an issue that has plagued him. This is an issue he needs to correct and throwing strikes at this poor of a rate isn’t good and pointing that out is fine to do. Acting like it’s some damning thing to say is ridiculously stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

Kinda weird getting into an argument based on one piece of a box score

It’s a pretty important piece and I’m not really arguing. I can’t help it that a grown man is obsessed with a young man to the point that any level of negativity is meant by some irrational ranting.

Pointing out that he needs to throw more strikes isn’t exactly some brilliant observation. I would assume everyone with any level of intelligence would acknowledge that to be something he needs to do..especially someone like Povich that has had problems with that in his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s a pretty important piece and I’m not really arguing.

image.thumb.png.f5c2043997e7d0070393db5c823e7b4e.png

Demanding to have the last word is actually an argument.

And it is over a difference of 6 pitches, over the course of 5+ innings.

The guy is trending in the right direction. That isn't really debatable. Hopefully it continues, because we will probably need him at some point this year, and definitely next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

image.thumb.png.f5c2043997e7d0070393db5c823e7b4e.png

Demanding to have the last word is actually an argument.

And it is over a difference of 6 pitches, over the course of 5+ innings.

The guy is trending in the right direction. That isn't really debatable. Hopefully it continues, because we will probably need him at some point this year, and definitely next.

What is the difference of 6 pitches?

8 more strikes would put him at ML average for str%.  And yea, that’s a big difference. 8 more strikes and maybe he is able to get more outs and use the pen less. 
 

And it’s definitely debatable if he’s trending in the right direction. I tend to believe he is and will get better but it’s over the top to say that’s not debatable. There is plenty of evidence to debate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2024 at 9:00 AM, Tony-OH said:

This is the most important piece to Povich. He needs to show he can do this consistently. I've seen Great, good, eh, and terrible Povich and too often that's over 4 starts. 

image.thumb.png.8c5318cb07cb4f9d210c4df0f1fc0989.png

While his WHIFF rate was low, he threw a lot of strikes and didn't get hit hard with an 83.8 MP EV. That tells me that while he didn't miss bats, batters also aren't barreling him very often either. He had a 50% GB rate which is better than he's had in the past. 

Again, I'm not thrilled with 100% zcontact, but at least it was soft contact.

Where can we find this? Do you have it for yesterday's start?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, way to spend two pages arguing over what was essentially a very good outing.   Yes, you’d like to see fewer walks, more strikes, fewer pitches.   But overall I’m very happy with 5 innings, 5 baserunners, 1 run, 9 strikeouts.   That’s especially good when you consider he’s pitching on 4 days’ rest against the same opponent twice in one week.    

The main thing I’ve wanted to see from Povich is more consistency.   He started to show a bit more towards the end of 2023 and this is a nice start to 2024.

Looks like he got a little tired at the end, allowing a walk and a single in the 6th inning before getting pulled.   That’s fine, it’s early in the year.   Something to work on as the year progresses, along with throwing more strikes.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Where can we find this? Do you have it for yesterday's start?

On Baseball Savant, go to Gamefeed on the menu, then choose the date you want (in this cases, April 7).  At the top you’ll see “13 MLB games” and there are dots under “MLB.”  Click there and it allows you to choose AAA instead.   Do that, scroll down to the Tides game and “click to open.”  Then, right below the banner with the score, click the rectangle that says “scoreboard.”  A menu pops up and you choose “player breakdowns.”   That’s where you’ll find this information.   Whew!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.61168f9af0c360e50e1f98df0bb1ae0a.png

47% WHIFF rate is outstanding but even more important is the 61% zcontact which means he was getting swings and misses in the zone. 

Definitely could see a drop in velocity by about 75 pitches. Was down to 90-91 MPH in the 6th inning after sitting 92-94 most of the game.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

image.thumb.png.61168f9af0c360e50e1f98df0bb1ae0a.png

47% WHIFF rate is outstanding but even more important is the 61% zcontact which means he was getting swings and misses in the zone. 

Definitely could see a drop in velocity by about 75 pitches. Was down to 90-91 MPH in the 6th inning after sitting 92-94 most of the game.

 

Love to see the WHiFF rate, especially after it wasn’t good in the first game.  Of course, that hasn’t been his issue in his career, so it’s not like it was something alarming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • No, but it should be open to discussion at that point.  
    • The Orioles have played 14 series and lost 3 of them.  After a couple of tough losses in Pittsburgh, they reeled off a 10-3 stretch.  After dropping the Oakland series, they followed that with a 10-4 run. Even with uneven run production in the early going, and with some slumping hitters, they are still matching up favorably record-wise with 1969 and 1970. I can’t imagine why anyone would be down at this point.  Were expectations for the team to be better than .660 at this point ?  
    • I think Mayo's future position is directly related with what we do with Ryan Mountcastle. We got Mounty for 2 more years, if we decide to keep him. Does the timeline work out that the Adley/Basallo catcher split allows the guy not caching to DH or 1B, and Mayo takes the third (1B/DH) spot?
    • I think that’s a fair question but the follow up question would be do you think that would warrant bringing in a new GM?
    • Hold up a second. If Elias comes out of this years trade deadline with the 2024 versions of Flaherty and Fuji and they wash out in the playoffs you don't think it's time to question his ability to close things out?
    • I think some fans are just inherently negative.   We follow the team so closely that we know the weaknesses of every player.   And every player, no matter how good, has weaknesses. Because a good starter is capable of being dominant in a given start, anything less can be a disappointment.   As an exercise, find a game where an Oriole starter pitched a good but not spectacular game, say 5.2 innings, 2 runs allowed, 5 hits, 2 walks.   Nothing wrong with that.   Not a dominant outing but in 2024 it's considered pretty good.  Now go to the game thread for that game and read how many comments there are about that pitcher, and count how many are positive and how many are negative.   I think you'll find the negatives VASTLY outweigh the positives.  I mean probably a ratio of about 10 to 1.  There will be comments about how he "doesn't have it tonight" after he walks a batter or falls behind a few batters in a row.    There will be comments about how he is about to implode.   If he throws a fat pitch down the middle that is hit for extra bases that will be pounced on.   If it is Irvin or Kremer there will be comments about how we need to get someone better and we don't want this guy pitching in a playoff game.   If it is Means or Bradish there will be questioning their health.   If it is G-Rod there will be comments that he has to be better than this.   Meanwhile, there will be a very small number of positiive comments.   Yet the end results (5.2/2 runs) is probably better than average.   That's just human nature.   Focusing on the negative is more interesting to many than focusing on the positive.
    • Great find Tony. BB% has dropped from 5.2 last year to 0.7. That could be a game changer if it sticks. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...