Jump to content

Colton Cowser 2024


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Gofannon said:

Santander does not get a long-term deal from us with the talent in the pipeline.  Not only that, our long-term contract priorities are Adley/Gunnar/Holliday/GrayRod/Bradish/other young talent TBD, not Santander.  A 3 or 4 year contract would could create a logjam both roster-wise and financially.

I like Santander.  We’re getting his age 29 season this year.   Why pay market rate for age 30-32 when you have Kjerstad and probably Mayo who are potential replacements making minimum?

Santander does a nice job in RF but if he loses another step or two, no bueno.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Amazing what happens when you give talented players actual playing time

To be fair, this sample size is 24 ABs. I'm glad he's more aggressive on balls in the zone and flashing his power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I like Santander.  We’re getting his age 29 season this year.   Why pay market rate for age 30-32 when you have Kjerstad and probably Mayo who are potential replacements making minimum?

Santander does a nice job in RF but if he loses another step or two, no bueno.

The scenario where it might make sense involves trading Kjerstad for a premium, cost-controlled pitcher. You'd have to have the right deal on the table for Kjerstad, agree to the right terms with Santander, and have some reassurance from the analytics team that Santander is a decent bet to maintain his performance over the next 3-4 years, but it would be a scenario that I'd at least put some thought into, were it my call. I'm not saying that I wouldn't ultimately decide that letting him walk is the best move, just that I don't see it as an automatic decision.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

This doesn’t make any sense to me.  Walks should affect wOBA and xwOBA exactly the same way and have no impact on the differential between the two.  

Anyway, I’m not going to worry about xwOBA today, following his two homer, one double performance.  
 

Right, the point was not about the differential between wOBA and xwOBA and being “lucky” with batted balls - it was that with a larger sample of PAs with that same chase rate he’d definitely have more walks, which would raise both of them. He was “unlucky” in only having one walk given he’s not chasing out of the zone.

Anyway, what I was saying about his xSLG and barrel rate changing quickly with one or two barrels happened exactly last night - 90th percentile barrel rate and 97th percentile .654 xSLG now 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bemorewins said:

Equal amount of rest imply interchangeable players, which our guys are NOT.

I don’t want Hays or Cowser playing CF 3/4 times a week. That is a serious defensive downgrade. Hays is not a legit MOO bat like Santander (save the rare occasions when he is super hot) otherwise that’s a downgrade offensively. The 2 interchangeable pieces are Cowser and Hays. And right now Cowser is white hot and Hays is ice cold. It makes no sense to split their time equally right now.

I think there is a decent chance that Cowser and Hays start all three games vs the Brewers with Mullins, O'Hearn and Santander getting one game off each.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

I think there is a decent chance that Cowser and Hays start all three games vs the Brewers with Mullins, O'Hearn and Santander getting one game off each.

I agree. We're going to see a lot of Hays this homestand, like it or not. They just tend to want to play Hays in LF at home, so that's kind of what I'm expecting. And I'm sure Hyde feels like he has to get him going at some point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I think there is a decent chance that Cowser and Hays start all three games vs the Brewers with Mullins, O'Hearn and Santander getting one game off each.

I’ll take the opposite side of that bet.  Hays, at most, starts two games, probably just the Hall start.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't think Hays in CF would be great, but I also would like to see what CC can do in center.  I've seen reports that he can be adequate to very good.

 

I think “adequate to possibly very good” is a suitable substitute for Mullins when need be. But few can go get a ball like Cedric Mullins. I hear Bradfield may be even better in that department. But time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

He wasn’t smiling like everyone else.

To be fair, it was a fleeting shot from the camera and he was on his way to give high 5's. 

That said, Cowser looked like Markakis at his best last night and really all series. Hays has his fair share of good games and moments, but they don't often come with home runs to both side of the field. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, deward said:

The scenario where it might make sense involves trading Kjerstad for a premium, cost-controlled pitcher. You'd have to have the right deal on the table for Kjerstad, agree to the right terms with Santander, and have some reassurance from the analytics team that Santander is a decent bet to maintain his performance over the next 3-4 years, but it would be a scenario that I'd at least put some thought into, were it my call. I'm not saying that I wouldn't ultimately decide that letting him walk is the best move, just that I don't see it as an automatic decision.

Trade Simulator says Kjerstad is about equal in value to the Ortiz/Hall package as well as Burnes. If we could get another clone of Burnes for Kjerstad I would be inclined to go for it. They have Kjerstad higher than Cowser for what it's worth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, deward said:

You can make a case for keeping Santander here on a 3-4 year deal, and trading Kjerstad for another asset. Not saying that's what they'll do, but I could understand it being considered as an option.

That’s definitely a possibility and I wouldn’t be really much opposed to it.

However, when we spend money on extensions, I would rather it be on our special/superstar players (Gunnar, Adley, Holliday, Burnes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Major League Leaderboards » 2024 » Center Fielders » Advanced Statistics | FanGraphs Baseball Not sure who's available in this list 150 PA minimum.
    • I have a hard time imagining a Trout deal will ever happen between Trout’s injuries, his contract, LAA assuredly still wanting some good prospects for him and the fact that trading the face of the franchise immediately after losing Ohtani would be an impossible sell to fans.  But even if all that were to align, I don’t see the Orioles coming out over the Phillies. If the Phillies weren’t a good team then maybe the Orioles could be a fit as otherwise closest to his hometown, but given they are also a top team Trout would likely say “I will only waive my NTC for Philly” and steer himself there. 
    • Wagner and one of those ML OFers aren’t stopping you from getting anyone. Kjerstad for Eovaldi is horrendous.
    • Perhaps he should be in the MVP conversation now. This Yahoo article has him #5 in the race. Not too shabby. https://sports.yahoo.com/checking-in-on-the-mlb-mvp-races-which-players-have-added-their-names-to-the-mix-through-the-first-third-of-the-season-213000493.html  
    • Never really thought about Mountcastle making it but when I did my voting was like he is right there because 1st base is one of weaker positions in todays game.  
    • In the ongoing discussion of CF targets, there is always the possibility that Cowser becomes the CF moving forward.  He's shown great improvement this season over what we saw last year.  Naturally, that would open another hole in LF, though LF is easier to fill than CF.  I prefer Cowser in LF, as it's a large territory to cover and he does a great job doing it, but that doesn't mean the idea of his taking over in CF is invalid.  The hope is that Mullins regains a facsimile of his prior form and puts this discussion on the backburner.  Keyword=hope... but I don't think any of us are counting on it.
    • It is amazing how little fanfare he gets on this site.  He does not make the flashy play like Gunnar at short but is the steady force that I think this team revolves around.  It is not a coincidence that this team started winning immediately when he was promoted.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...