Jump to content

Are we actually 27-14 with the highest runs/game in the AL?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Just wait.  If the Orioles don’t make a deep run in the playoffs (unlike others I don’t consider that a lock) half the board will want a new manager and floating the idea that Elias is a builder but not a closer and it might be time for a change.

Those people would be crazy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The “two game losing streak” and the “almost swept” really bothered people. Bothered them so much that maybe they’re ok without an all “homegrown” position group. 

You are the Iron Man of weird narratives.

Edited by maybenxtyr
  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Just wait.  If the Orioles don’t make a deep run in the playoffs (unlike others I don’t consider that a lock) half the board will want a new manager and floating the idea that Elias is a builder but not a closer and it might be time for a change.

I don’t think a deep run in the playoffs is ever a lock.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people are misinterpreting my OP.  I’m not telling anyone how to be a fan.  I’m just pointing out that (1) for every present negative, there’s a counterweighting positive, and on balance, the positive is winning hands down as reflected in the W-L record, and (2) the current negatives won’t last forever, just like hot streaks don’t last forever.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The playoffs are a crapshoot.  You just need to get in….just look at last year.  Absolutely no one had those teams going to the World Series.  Your offense and pitching just need to click at the right time. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t think a deep run in the playoffs is ever a lock.  

What I meant to say is I don’t consider making the playoffs a lock.  SG started a thread yesterday like it’s a sure thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s pretty amazing how quickly fans can get spoiled.  Soon people will be comparing us to Yankees and Red Sox fans.  

What is the purpose of this message board if people don't talk about the team? Either negative or positive? When I see a post from MLB on Facebook regarding the O's, or an O's game most of the fans are being just that, fans. I mean even on an O's post you still get Astros and Rangers fans downing the team. Last week when they lost a game to Arizona and there was a post, most folks were fairly complimentary to Arizona and happy with 2/3. I guess every fan base has their extremes, but I think most of us are a far cry away from expecting anything to be given.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s pretty amazing how quickly fans can get spoiled.  Soon people will be comparing us to Yankees and Red Sox fans.  

Well, I definitely was spoiled for a couple decades in my youth (70’s-80’s). The O’s were always as good or better. It was glorious never being afraid of being in the AL East.

Then a new reality set in. That 14-year losing streak was way more humble pie than I anticipated.

Now I don’t feel spoiled at all. I’m grateful I’ve lived long enough to see my Birds feared again.

In essence, I agree with your original post. 

Concern by some fans is always good, but it seems early to be throwing bricks at the TV (or computer screen) based on how well the O’s are doing overall.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think some people are misinterpreting my OP.  I’m not telling anyone how to be a fan.  I’m just pointing out that (1) for every present negative, there’s a counterweighting positive, and on balance, the positive is winning hands down as reflected in the W-L record, and (2) the current negatives won’t last forever, just like hot streaks don’t last forever.   

I think some fans are just inherently negative.   We follow the team so closely that we know the weaknesses of every player.   And every player, no matter how good, has weaknesses.

Because a good starter is capable of being dominant in a given start, anything less can be a disappointment.   As an exercise, find a game where an Oriole starter pitched a good but not spectacular game, say 5.2 innings, 2 runs allowed, 5 hits, 2 walks.   Nothing wrong with that.   Not a dominant outing but in 2024 it's considered pretty good.  Now go to the game thread for that game and read how many comments there are about that pitcher, and count how many are positive and how many are negative.   I think you'll find the negatives VASTLY outweigh the positives.  I mean probably a ratio of about 10 to 1.  There will be comments about how he "doesn't have it tonight" after he walks a batter or falls behind a few batters in a row.    There will be comments about how he is about to implode.   If he throws a fat pitch down the middle that is hit for extra bases that will be pounced on.   If it is Irvin or Kremer there will be comments about how we need to get someone better and we don't want this guy pitching in a playoff game.   If it is Means or Bradish there will be questioning their health.   If it is G-Rod there will be comments that he has to be better than this.   Meanwhile, there will be a very small number of positiive comments.   Yet the end results (5.2/2 runs) is probably better than average.   That's just human nature.   Focusing on the negative is more interesting to many than focusing on the positive.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, interloper said:

Those people would be crazy. 

Hold up a second.

If Elias comes out of this years trade deadline with the 2024 versions of Flaherty and Fuji and they wash out in the playoffs you don't think it's time to question his ability to close things out?

Edited by Can_of_corn
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Hold up a second.

If Elias comes out of this years trade deadline with the 2024 versions of Flaherty and Fuji and they wash out in the playoffs you don't think it's time to question his ability to close things out?

I think that’s a fair question but the follow up question would be do you think that would warrant bringing in a new GM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have played 14 series and lost 3 of them.  After a couple of tough losses in Pittsburgh, they reeled off a 10-3 stretch.  After dropping the Oakland series, they followed that with a 10-4 run.

Even with uneven run production in the early going, and with some slumping hitters, they are still matching up favorably record-wise with 1969 and 1970.

I can’t imagine why anyone would be down at this point.  Were expectations for the team to be better than .660 at this point ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Hold up a second.

If Elias comes out of this years trade deadline with the 2024 versions of Flaherty and Fuji and they wash out in the playoffs you don't think it's time to question his ability to close things out?

So two playoff appearances and you’re ready to question his ability to close things out? I find it funny how so many are hesitant to make assumptions about players based on small sample sizes, but people are willing to make these huge assumptions about Elias based off of tiny sample sizes. People were also saying Elias couldn’t make a trade for a big name starter until he made the trade for Burnes.
 

And the playoffs are a crapshoot anyway. I’d give him at least a couple more years before I’m questioning whether or not he could get us to a world series. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...