Jump to content

Oscar goes to..The Padres for RP Cla Meredith


pasadena

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 447
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We just traded Salazar for a reliever that can throw the ball. You heard him linked to other teams as well. so its not like the guy has no value. What were we really expecting to get for Salazar? A fading prospect or over the hill contributor? We just landed a reliever that could make the Baez or Sherrill trade an easier transition. We could always trade Meredith and Baez to a team gaining a fairly good prospect and saving $3.5 Million or so off the books.

If this trade pushes us to deal Sherrill for an abover average corner infielder, would everyone be ho hum about the trade. It's hard to trade role players off the bench for players that actually get in the game.

I like this deal, a lot as I think it sets us up beautifully for another deal. If we do not make a side deal, then this deal is still not a bad trade IMO,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know things are pretty slow in O's land when there is a 17 page thread devoted to acquiring Clay, I mean Cla Meredith.

IMO this is nothing really exciting. Looks like we gave up a good hitter off the bench for a Bradfordesque type pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just heard its a four way deal with the Mariners sending us Ronny Cedeno, the Padres sending us Sean Gallagher and the Cubs sending us Donald Veal.

In an unrelated deal, Brian Roberts has been sent to the Cubs as the PTBNL in the Rich Hill trade.

Veal is a Pirate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody know how good or bad the infield defense is in SD? If he pitches to contact and the infield ends up ranging to the balls in the middle will that help his ERA and hits/9 innings? I purposely said range up the middle as we know we have no range at the corners. I think this trade also goes to AM's philosophy of stockpiling arms. Time will tell. We were going to lose Salazar tomorrow for nothing anyway so the chance at something is better for nothing! This had to hamstring AM somewhat as everybody knew we had a roster crunch. Props to AM for getting something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping we might get something useful for Salazar. Judging from this guy's declining numbers and his home/road splits this year, I'd say we didn't get much of anythying useful. We'll see.

I won't judge this trade on how Cla is pitching right now. He has pitched better in the past. He has an option. He could go to Norfolk, get straighten out and make this trade look good. It's the trade of a 31 year old for a 26 year old with major league experience. The trade may have some upside in the long run. See post #225.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ordinarily, I portray MacPhail as a polite but stealthy swashbuckling despot who robs teams for the least of our players, but I can't give this trade a hearty MacPhail the Mighty ARRRRRRRRR! Instead, I'll quietly lift a pint of grog and nod my head. :confused:

Does this transaction make Baez, who has been pitching poorly of late, expendable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like the idea of calling him Cassius Clay. I like this trade a lot, it's the most we could expect to get from a career minor leaguer. Also, I'm glad we picked up a submariner/side-armer from VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody know how good or bad the infield defense is in SD? If he pitches to contact and the infield ends up ranging to the balls in the middle will that help his ERA and hits/9 innings? I purposely said range up the middle as we know we have no range at the corners. I think this trade also goes to AM's philosophy of stockpiling arms. Time will tell. We were going to lose Salazar tomorrow for nothing anyway so the chance at something is better for nothing! This had to hamstring AM somewhat as everybody knew we had a roster crunch. Props to AM for getting something.

That's what people need to keep in mind. He was going to be gone tommorow for nothing. If you want to argue AM should have made another roster move that's a different story but it became apparent in AM's opinion and many others that Oscar was the odd man out. Getting back a guy who is 26 and has pitched to a career sub 4.00 ERA over 3+ years in the majors and is still arb eligable for a few more years is good by me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a reasonable trade considering Salazar's age and lack of proven production at the major league level, and considering the roster crunch.

However, I think there is good reason to suspect that Salazar is a late bloomer who could have given us a couple of respectable seasons as a stopgap everyday first baseman until we're able to develop or trade for a younger alternative. With a little creative roster management we could have postponed D-day on Salazar until after the trade deadline, giving AM time to deal Huff.

I'll also point out that a bunch of people on the board warned that we would wind up losing Salazar way back when he was called up to replace Izturis on the roster. Those people were correct, although at least we didn't just lose him on a waiver claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I do have questions about Basallo’s progress as a catcher.   By my calculations, the Baysox have allowed 5.68 runs/game when Basallo has caught (25 games), 4.11 runs/game when others have caught.  We know that stats like CERA have a lot of noise in them, especially in a small sample, but 1.57 runs/game is a huge margin.  He’s also committed 4 errors and 4 passed balls in 25 games at C, and has caught only 22% of runners (8/36).   By comparison, Silas Ardoin has started 31 games at C and has only 2 errors and 2 PB, and has caught 40% of runners (16/40).    These are all superficial numbers, but they raise questions in my mind and I’d need someone who watches Basallo a lot and knows how to evaluate catchers to tell me how he rates behind the dish.    
    • This is a very simple yet incredibly accurate post regarding the two of JH and Gunnar. I think some of our folks have blinders due to the 1:1 draft position of JH and simply cannot let go of the idea of him being this all-world superstar SS because he was drafted as a SS. Wasn't Bryce Harper drafted 1:1 .... as a catcher and got moved to the outfield? Guys get drafted high as (insert whatever position) and are given the opportunity to play themselves off of that position year in and year out. I firmly believe that this is true with JH. That approach of 'well, he's probably best suited at a different spot but it only increases the strength of the organization if he can mature into a viable SS option so let's run out that groundball' is 100% what I believe that they did with him. I don't know how anyone who has spent time in instruction, scouting, playing above a HS level would not see the flaws in his defensive game. It's not only the arm and I agree that his elbow issues are likely from trying to increase his arm strength. I've given my opinion on what I've seen of him with my own eyes (more than 30 games worth) and I will continue to describe his SS prospects as you could stick him there (a la Manny 2018 and he won't kill you but he's never going to be the best defensive SS option. For an org like the O's who have demonstrated the importance of defense over and over and over again, they're just not going to stick weaker defender into a more important defensive role.. especially given that they have a current player there who may be the current best overall player in the game and has stated repeatedly that he views himself as a SS, wants to play SS and basically someone is going to have kill him to take it from him.  I share your belief that JH is going to fine and will figure out how to hit at the ML level in due time. He's going to be a very productive player for a long time but barring injury too Gunnar, I just do not see him EVER getting reps as a SS in Baltimore without some form of a Manny-type scenario where back in 2018 they slid him over to SS, knowing full-well that they were going to trade him that year and simply wanted to 1. appease Manny and 2. market him as a SS at the deadline, which they did. I stand by my original statement 18 months or so back.. JH's profile is best suited as a 2B but I do not rule out a move to the OF. 
    • Mateo is the more useful player so my preference would be the team trades Urias to open up a spot for Mayo. Mateo plays multiple positions pretty well and can pinch run. Trade Urias for a low level MILB player if that's the best Elias can get for him. I'd love to pick up a potential bullpen arm, but I don't think Urias getting you a decent pitcher in return.
    • I do fault Elias for not having a backup plan for Means. And relying on Tyler Wells as any kind of starter wasn't a great idea. Montgomery would have been great insurance. Bradish the O's found out about in February. Here were the available options at that date (mid Feb): Chase Anderson - uhh, no Brandon Woodruff - hurt at time of signing Brad Keller - career 4.50 (give or take) ERA guy with the FIP to match Domingo German - domestic violence, stinks in the minors with the Pirates right now Michael Lorenzen - would have been a good option, tbh Jordan Montgomery - would have been a good option Lorenzen and Montgomery would have been solid options/insurance.  Also, I disagree 100% on Povich. Definitely not a 5th starter *at best*. 
    • CHW GM Getz sure drives a hard bargain , smh . I guess Elias has wait and see what team(s) are offering for Crochet, then decide whether make last ditch offer 
    • Over the offseason, was there any pitching transactions better than ME acquisition of Burnes (#1 starter) and Kimbrel (closer)?  I guess I am confused at any “miscalculations” of the market when your GM is able to bring in from outside the organization the two most valuable pitching positions on the roster.
    • The thing is, they were never collapses after being good.  It was always a collapse from mediocrity to awfulness.  Didn't the O's in the "Dark Ages" have the official goal of reaching .500.  I can 't imagine that Elias has ever had a goal for the O's to be an average team.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...