Jump to content

Dan Duquette on O's pitching philosophy: "We don't like the cutter"


Orsino

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

First of all, at least we have a philosophy.

Second of all, if the philosophy is that the cutter should be, at most, a complementary pitch rather than a staple, I can get behind it. If the philosophy is, don't throw the cutter, that seems silly and inflexible.

Tommy Hunter is an example of a guy who throws too many cutters at times. But Erik Bedard, when he was here, would throw a cutter maybe five times a game and it was highly effective because the batters were geared up for other pitches.

I've heard that over-reliance on the cutter can affect velocity on the regular fastball and I suspect that is what Duquette is trying to avoid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't mince words.

I remember reading an article in SI over 20 years ago blaming Gooden's loss of velocity on overuse of the cutter.

There was an article in BP w/i the last week blaming Beckett's struggles this year on overuse of the cutter.

Lester's demise has likewise been blamed on overuse of the cutter.

I don't like taking absolutes on any position. But, I think there are legitimate concerns about the usage of the cutter, particularly for developing pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet Denver will have some thoughts on this one...

In reading this it doesn't appear to me that DD's issue with throwing the cut FB is health related. It is pretty clear that his philosophy is that it won't play in the majors. Given that, I am unsure why they wouldn't let him throw it at least some in the minors. Does DD have some statistical analysis that shows the cutter works in the minors but not in the majors? If that's the case then well I guess I understand. If not, then this makes no sense to me. I get having him concentrate on other pitches but this seems awfully ridged. I also assume that they will let him throw it at some point. It would be insane not to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, at least we have a philosophy.

Second of all, if the philosophy is that the cutter should be, at most, a complementary pitch rather than a staple, I can get behind it. If the philosophy is, don't throw the cutter, that seems silly and inflexible.

Tommy Hunter is an example of a guy who throws too many cutters at times. But Erik Bedard, when he was here, would throw a cutter maybe five times a game and it was highly effective because the batters were geared up for other pitches.

I've heard that over-reliance on the cutter can affect velocity on the regular fastball and I suspect that is what Duquette is trying to avoid.

Yeah, I've been hearing that for over 20 years.

I pretty much agree w everything you write here. It's silly if it's an absolute, but it makes perfect sense if they want to develop pitchers that don't rely to heavily upon it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't mince words.

I remember reading an article in SI over 20 years ago blaming Gooden's loss of velocity on overuse of the cutter.

There was an article in BP w/i the last week blaming Beckett's struggles this year on overuse of the cutter.

Lester's demise has likewise been blamed on overuse of the cutter.

I heard the flyball that Rivera blew his knee out trying to shag was a cutter....

And I'm pretty sure a cutter once kicked Roy Halladay's dog too.....

Okay, that's a bit flippant on my part and but if they really are being that dogmatic about it I think that's equally as silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet Denver will have some thoughts on this one...

In reading this it doesn't appear to me that DD's issue with throwing the cut FB is health related. It is pretty clear that his philosophy is that it won't play in the majors. Given that, I am unsure why they wouldn't let him throw it at least some in the minors. Does DD have some statistical analysis that shows the cutter works in the minors but not in the majors? If that's the case then well I guess I understand. If not, then this makes no sense to me. I get having him concentrate on other pitches but this seems awfully ridged. I also assume that they will let him throw it at some point. It would be insane not to.

If so, he needs to watch Mariano Rivera. Best RP ever, throws nothing but cutters.

Obviously, he's a special case, but I don't like the idea of taking away our best prospect's best pitch. I hope they make an allowance for Bundy.......like he did on the 500 AB's at AA or higher for Machado.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If so, he needs to watch Mariano Rivera. Best RP ever, throws nothing but cutters.

Duquette actually mentioned him by name in the article and dismissed the notion that Rivera even throws a cutter. I guess his argument is since he only throws that one pitch there's really no risk in having it affect his other pitches...so by DDs logic, it's really just a plain ol' fastball for Mo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard the flyball that Rivera blew his knee out trying to shag was a cutter....

And I'm pretty sure a cutter once kicked Roy Halladay's dog too.....

Okay, that's a bit flippant on my part and but if they really are being that dogmatic about it I think that's equally as silly.

Oh no. I don't think it's flippant at all when baseball men have been laying a loss of effectivness and velocity on the cutter for a generation now, and you brush it aside in 15 words.

But, yes, for the third post in a row I agree that they shouldn't be dogmatic on the issue, and DD doesn't seem to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If so, he needs to watch Mariano Rivera. Best RP ever, throws nothing but cutters.

Obviously, he's a special case, but I don't like the idea of taking away our best prospect's best pitch. I hope they make an allowance for Bundy.......like he did on the 500 AB's at AA or higher for Machado.

I think they will. I wonder how good Mariano would be as a starter, throwing nothing but cutters.

I remember hearing that the coaches were on Hunter to throw more 4 seam fastballs. I also remember watching Shields pitch earlier this year and Palmer commenting on the lack of fastballs and his reliance on cutters and changeups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If so, he needs to watch Mariano Rivera. Best RP ever, throws nothing but cutters.

Obviously, he's a special case, but I don't like the idea of taking away our best prospect's best pitch. I hope they make an allowance for Bundy.......like he did on the 500 AB's at AA or higher for Machado.

According to DD, Mariano doesn't throw a cutter...

"That's a fastball. That's a fastball. That's his only pitch, he's a one-pitch wonder. It's his fastball," Duquette said. "Name me all the pitchers in the big leagues that make a living with a cut fastball? Rivera's is a fastball. It moves."

I understand what he is saying and if he has statistical analysis that shows that the cutter doesn't play except for the best RP in history then I get it. But I don't like absolutes and who knows if Bundy's cutter isn't just as good. I am assuming they will let him throw it at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...