Jump to content

Some stuff


bigbird

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 459
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Peace, you're blowing this Kuroda thing out of proportion. The Dodgers have decided that getting Kuroda would be "enough" for them (can't really blame them, their rotation is solid and the NL stinks). So sooner than giving up some excellent prospects for Bedard, they'd rather see if they sign Kuroda. In turn, the Orioles wish to wait to see what the Dodgers do, to make sure they don't take one deal when another would have been on the table.

Hence Kuroda holds up Bedard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First it was Arod, than MCab, than Santana, now its a guy no one has ever seen pitch in the Major Leagues. If Im Bedard Im beside myself that this guy is getting more pub than me.

This is how major sports networks (cough, espn, cough) view baseball.

Red Sox, Yankees, Red Sox, Yankees, any Japan player, Red Sox, Yankees, Red Sox, Yankees... (repeat 2-dozen more times)... oh yea every other team in the majors.

Each of those players were linked to those teams in one way or another... its as simple as that.

boobs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean you would think at least after Haren was traded that Bedard would be next. But reading BB's report, we have to wait for another player to sign before we make a move. And AM is ready to make the move. They are waiting on the runway waiting for the good to go call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha, actually I do, He could careless about the pub.

Pardon my rant but Kuroda's agent has me really heated.

Agreed. I remember reading last Sunday - or was it Monday - that he was on a plane to LA to sign a contract. Now this crap. Watch the guy completely flop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean you would think at least after Haren was traded that Bedard would be next. But reading BB's report, we have to wait for another player to sign before we make a move. And AM is ready to make the move. They are waiting on the runway waiting for the good to go call.

Once Kuroda signs, do you think we will make our trade almost instantaneously? ie. we know what we are doing under both scenarios?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean you would think at least after Haren was traded that Bedard would be next. But reading BB's report, we have to wait for another player to sign before we make a move. And AM is ready to make the move. They are waiting on the runway waiting for the good to go call.

Do we know the passengers on the plane on this hypothetical runway? :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peace, you're blowing this Kuroda thing out of proportion. The Dodgers have decided that getting Kuroda would be "enough" for them (can't really blame them, their rotation is solid and the NL stinks). So sooner than giving up some excellent prospects for Bedard, they'd rather see if they sign Kuroda. In turn, the Orioles wish to wait to see what the Dodgers do, to make sure they don't take one deal when another would have been on the table.

Hence Kuroda holds up Bedard.

so hmm, go with 4 years on someone unproven and could possibly be a bust.

Rather

Trade two or three prospects (who you can make up for down the road) for Eik Bedard. One of the best lefties in the game. Also someone who your new manager covets.

If I want to win now, I go with the latter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But its Erik Freakin Bedard. You would be an instant contender if you drafted him. If you want to win now with Joe Torre at the helm you trade for Bedard no matter what you give up.

But Peace look at from the other side.....they have what we dream of a stocked talented ML ready bunch of guys. We have a guy who they have never seen pitch and looks like he has only had 1 good year. All I keep hearing is " he hasnt even pitched 200 innings". They didnt see him in 2006 when he was the best pitcher in baseball before the AS break and the freak leg injury. They didnt see him to digest the 10.5K/9 pitching in the AL East.

He isnt a name like Beckett or even Haren. I bet 7 out of 10 Dodgers fans would rather have Haren just cus they know his name. I know 7 out of 10 Reds fans would because they had a poll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What seems to get lost in all of this is that what the Dodgers need more than anything is more offense. They've got pitching.

Sure more is always better, but nevertheless, it becomes counterproductive to trade for Bedard if the lineup will be weakened (thinking specifically of Kemp).

It's much like how losing Pie to upgrade from DeRosa to Roberts doesn't make much sense for the Cubbies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Peace look at from the other side.....they have what we dream of a stocked talented ML ready bunch of guys. We have a guy who they have never seen pitch and looks like he has only had 1 good year. All I keep hearing is " he hasnt even pitched 200 innings". They didnt see him in 2006 when he was the best pitcher in baseball before the AS break and the freak leg injury. They didnt see him to digest the 10.5K/9 pitching in the AL East.

He isnt a name like Beckett or even Haren. I bet 7 out of 10 Dodgers fans would rather have Haren just cus they know his name. I know 7 out of 10 Reds fans would because they had a poll.

Yeah but they dont have to go on Youtube to see his latest outings. Plus he has pitched in the toughest division in baseball.

Thats good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so hmm, go with 4 years on someone unproven and could possibly be a bust.

Rather

Trade two or three prospects (who you can make up for down the road) for Eik Bedard. One of the best lefties in the game. Also someone who your new manager covets.

If I want to win now, I go with the latter

Erik Bedard was one of the best lefties in the game in 2007. He's not one of the best lefties in the game, period.

Why did I even go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Mookie Betts has gotten more than 2/3 good years on his extension. Look at what Boston has been (and will most probably continue to be) since they traded him. Same for Bryce Harper with Philly (despite his injuries). I agree that for almost all longer term contracts, you will get diminishing returns toward the back end. But that’s the cost of doing business in modern day MLB. If Elias and Sig are as good at drafting and developing as they appear to be, by the time Gunnar and Adley begin to age/deteriorate, we should already have other players to help buffer them.  I just don’t think that it is in any way realistic to think that you can continue to replace “special” talent. Nor do I think that it is helpful for any orgs relationship with their fanbase to continue to operate on the cheap. It’s not like the fans will be given a discount if the org spends less money. The fans don’t benefit from an owner not spending, it’s the owners profit margin solely that benefits in that scenario.
    • I’d be happier if we were actually having rain. 
    • Per usual......You can discount the words of perhaps the greatest Oriole of all time just to make internet drama.   I sir, will not. 
    • Maybe Brown can do a reprise this year for all his "fans" on the Hangout.
    • Just left the key part for those that don't care much for reading.
    • Baseball relies so much on mental and technical abilities that it makes it hard to judge against the other big 4 sports of football, Bball, and hockey.  Which are much more reliant on pure size or physical athletic ability. I think of baseball very similar to the way I think about golf.  Both involve hitting a very small ball with oddly shaped clubs.  It is not so much about pure athletic ability as it is repetition and mental strength.   Of course in the end the best athletes in baseball do well, but how many great golfers are there at age 20, 21, 22, or even 23?  Not many.   It really requires mental toughness as much as anything and as a 20 year old that can be hard to come by without experience.
    • Insufferable. The feigning of indignation that Ben McDonald couldn’t know who Blink-182 was stupid. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...