Jump to content

Brian Matusz Today, 2013


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

It may be time to look at Matusz as a situational lefty/LOOGY type. His changeup is just not there. Kind of sad really.

He threw one the other night when he came in for a first pitch called strike then he couldn't find the plate with it again. Yes, sad. I'd trade him, he wants to start and I'd rather not have a malcontent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He threw one the other night when he came in for a first pitch called strike then he couldn't find the plate with it again. Yes, sad. I'd trade him, he wants to start and I'd rather not have a malcontent.

Yeah quite a fall. First round pick and #2 starter, to reliever, to LOOGY boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Start? He has trouble going more than 1 inning in relief. Got away with some really bad pitches in the 8th.

Yeah, he was more lucky than good today. If he doesn't improve, you'd have to think he's a trade candidate or DFA candidate next year. I believe he still has an option left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's good, but I'm not sure he's worth arbitration money though. LOOGYs are pretty easy to find and pretty cheap.

Nope, that's why I'd package him along with Strop to a NL team. The option will make him valuable and someone might still think he can start. Strop has a live arm and he was lights out and in the WBC this year.

Do I sound like I'm selling used cars?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, that's why I'd package him along with Strop to a NL team. The option will make him valuable and someone might still think he can start. Strop has a live arm and he was lights out and in the WBC this year.

Do I sound like I'm selling used cars?

Yeah, that sounds like a decent plan. Maybe Matusz gets Nolacso and we just slot Hendrickson or Gausman in the BP. I was much higher on Matusz a few weeks ago, but he just doesn't look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that sounds like a decent plan. Maybe Matusz gets Nolacso and we just slot Hendrickson or Gausman in the BP. I was much higher on Matusz a few weeks ago, but he just doesn't look good.

I like the idea of Gausman there. That's what Earl used to do and it limits his innings. You can always bring him in for a spot start later in the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Start? He has trouble going more than 1 inning in relief. Got away with some really bad pitches in the 8th.

Also,the 7th. Was at the game and his pitches looked awfully hittable. Alot of good cuts and just miss long files. Drew really got into one.

I was wondering why O'Day never warmed up or got in the game? Virus also?

Matusz would give up many homers as a starter. Young Sweaty Freddy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

BRIAN MATUSZ O (vs. TIGERS, 6/18)

IP:. 0.33 *

H:o 0

R:O 0

BB: 0

SO: 0

Pitches: 1 (1 Strike, 0 Balls)

2013 ERA: 4.08

* Matusz entered the game with runners on 1st and 3rd base and two outs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

BRIAN MATUSZ O (vs. TIGERS, 6/18)

IP:. 0.33 *

H:o 0

R:O 0

BB: 0

SO: 0

Pitches: 1 (1 Strike, 0 Balls)

2013 ERA: 4.08

* Matusz entered the game with runners on 1st and 3rd base and two outs.

I love that he did it in one pitch. And I especially love that Buck wasn't tempted to bring him back for the 8th, even though he'd thrown only one pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Not including the intentional walk, Matusz threw strikes for 15 out his 19 pitches.

BRIAN MATUSZ O (vs. BLUE JAYS, 6/21)

IP:. 1.33 O(LOSS)

H:o 1

R:O 1

BB: 1 *

SO: 0

Pitches: 23 (15 Strike, 8 Balls) **

2013 ERA: 4.20

* The walk was intentional.

** 19 (15 Strikes, 4 Balls) .[Minus the Intentional Walk]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Another game with a good strikes-to-balls ratio for Brian (14 Strikes, 5 Balls.)

BRIAN MATUSZ O (vs. INDIANS, 6/24)

IP:. 1

H:o 1

R:O 0

BB: 0

SO: 2

Pitches: 19 (14 Strike, 5 Balls)

2013 ERA: 4.06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Um... Trading Basallo doesn't shorten our window to 1-2 years. What will shorten our window of being the best team in baseball is if we go cheap and don't extend superstars like Adley/Gunnar/Holliday. OR if those who we choose to extend suffer injuries and are never the same level ballplayers. I don't see a realistic scenario where loosing one of Basallo/Mayo/Kjerstad shortens our window.
    • Yeah I think he goes back down along with McKenna when Hays comes back with Norby joining him.  They want Ryan for a defensive replacement in the outfield while Hays is out but once Hays is there he can be that guy and then Norby can come in and play some second and also outfield.  Elias has said he very close so that tells me he is here by June 1 if not earlier.  
    • A Miller move would be for more than one or two years even if you are factoring in a TJ surgery.
    • No, the window is more important than just one year. Ten years vs. 1-2
    • Petition to have a separate trade forum for these types of discussions.
    • no, Miller can be as good as he wants, the elbow or shoulder injury is going to come so no not trading a top hitting prospect for him 
    • You see that's where you and I have a point of departure. I NEVER believe in making fear-based decisions that are informed by past pains/"traumas". You have to try to evaluate each decision as their own. Matt Weiters has absolutely ZERO to do with Adley Rutschman, except that both played catcher for the Orioles. Totally different games/styles, strengths and weaknesses. Weiters had a much better throwing arm than Rutschman has. That's it. Not other attribute was better. Adley is smaller in size, a better athlete by far, and a superior hitter in EVERY way. I also, don't agree with you take on assets. You can never have too many useful assets. It's better to have players that are acutally contributing to a championship (especially multiple championship runs) than it is to have insurance that you don't use for just in case scenarios. What if Adley doesn't get hurt? What if Mayo moves to RF and Kjerstad to DH. Where does Basallo play? Are you going to move him to 1B and jettison Mountcastle? That's fine. But then what would be the plan to obtain the requisite pitching talent? Do we need to have all-star type players at all 9 positions and how much is having that worth sacrificing top pitching talent?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...