Jump to content

This is A Mess (Mega RANT Thread)


eddie83

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Cubs are looking at relievers.

Yeah, they're looking at guys like Papelbon who take money and not talent. No one above Vogelbach on the prospect tree is being moved for a reliever so any mentions of McKinney,Gleyber,Schwarber,Baez,Castro etc can be thrown out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what possible interest would the Red Sox have in three months of Bud Norris? We couldn't get anything for Bud this offseason, we sure as heck are not going to get a replacement for Adam Jones when Bud has been sent to the bullpen with a 6.98 ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other thread closed while I was trying to respond to questions about trades. Summary of what I was writing:

Machado is young, impactful, and cost controlled. Not an asset I look to trade unless I'm getting same back. I advocated trading Jones rather than extending him. He has been better than I expected, for sure. I would have been open to trading him this offseason when San Diego was clearly in need of a CF if it meant bringing back Myers and one or two other cost controlled pieces. Add Britton while we're at it.

BAL - Jones, Britton

SD - Myers, Wisler, Renfroe

And trade for Upton with Harvey anchoring the deal:

ATL - Harvey, Sisco, international money

BAL - Justin Upton

And trade for Jackie Bradley Jr as a down-order bat that will provide plus defense in center field and hopefully grow into an okay bat eventually.

BAL - JBJ

BOS - Norris (BAL paying half of contract)

2015

C - Wieters/Joseph

1B - Davis

2B - Schoop

SS - Hardy

3B - Machado

LF - Myers

CF - JBJ

RF - Upton

DH - Same collection of candidates

SP01 - Tillman

SP02 - Chen

SP03 - Gonzalez

SP04 - Jimenez

SP05 - Gausman

(AAA - Wisler, Wright, Wilson, Davies)

I don't believe that team is any worse than the team Baltimore has now, allows for more roster flexibility because you have everyday players rather than platoons (including cost controlled and cheap Myers and JBJ), and has added to your upper-minors a long term RF solution that could be ready by 2016 (Renfroe) and a potential mid-rotation arm that is ready in 2015 if needed (Wisler, who is also your ready replacement for Chen).

I think the Orioles missed an opportunity to load up on collegiate talent that could be ready to help out much more quickly than the HSers. We'll see how it shakes out.

Next year's QO picks, likewise, we'll see how many are in play and what comes of them.

Machado and Schoop are long term pieces for me, with the latter being available in a deal if the right deal comes along and I have another decent option at 2B. Not a believer in Paredes as a long term solution.

I think you can get one of their low minors arms (Cease would be my target) plus Vogelbach, McKinney, or Almora -- potentially Javier Baez or Castro straight up.

I take whatever deal is best overall value and give the closer job to Will Smith. If I get Baez I'm rotating him, Schoop, Hardy, and Machado through the DH spot to keep legs fresh, and then making a decision as to whether or not he or Machado is the long term shortstop once Hardy leaves.

I really hate a lot of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I don't get. I see some moves with the future in mind. The Upton move doesn't really fit. Why are we trading two of our top 5 prospects for a one year rental? The team you built is arguably pretty comparable to the current team. With Myers, Bradley, Renfroe, we have some future pieces. Why give up two more future pieces for Upton?

Price of replacing the Jones production in the "now", and hopefully you are in a position to lock him up long term (though that can't be the deciding factor in making the move). Neither Sisco nor Harvey is contributing in the next two years and both still have developmental questions attached to them. Ultimately, I feel like I'm better off in the aggregate with Myers/Renfroe/Wisler and then having to sign Upton to the extension or as a FA than having Jones/Sisco/Harvey.

But clearly that's not a slam dunk -- could turn out very poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, they're looking at guys like Papelbon who take money and not talent. No one above Vogelbach on the prospect tree is being moved for a reliever so any mentions of McKinney,Gleyber,Schwarber,Baez,Castro etc can be thrown out.

If you say so, but I'd be a little less sure of myself were I in your shoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever trades for Cameron Maybin is going to get a heck of a deal. His LD% is up, MED% is way up, he's going opposite field more than he ever has before. There's a lot of information suggesting the improvements he has made at the plate this year are real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, let's be fair. Trading the veterans for prospects is a great way to build the system. We MIGHT be better off today. Would we have won 96 games and made the playoffs in 2014 if we had traded Hardy, Wieters, etc.? Maybe. But that clearly wasn't the intention of the guy who wanted to to that in December of 2013

This also assumes that the prospects would have been ML regulars. That is far from certain.

All correct.

The PRIMARY intention was to sell high on cost controlled star players. As I note repeatedly with the Bedard trade, there should be the possibility of including in the prospects acquired one or two major league ready guys who could put up quality WAR numbers right away to reduce the impact of the talent lost.

Clearly, there is a bit of hindsight saying we would have competed anyway, but I will say that I do not think it is a coincidence. Similarly, trading the players was not made with the thought the team would languish at the bottom of the division. There was a core of Jones, Tillman, Machado, Bundy, EdRod and others in the organization.

Dealing cost controlled players for prospects brings financial flexibility, reduced injury risk and an accumulation of talent that has a way of working into competitiveness quicker than expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JBJ. Not saying he won't ever hit. But with a .543 OPS in 509 career AB's, how long would he have actually lasted in CF for this team. He'd be in Norfolk right now and David Lough or someone would be our CF. What's the latest on Myer's wrist? He's been having problems with it for two years now.

No question there is risk with the bat, but he's a legit potential 2 win defender, so there is room for him as a eight- or nine-hole hitter so long as he's chewing up grass in a value-friendly CF like Baltimore. Tough for me to say what he'd be doing and whether it would be in Norfolk or Baltimore.

Myers had surgery in June to remove a bone spur in the wrist -- currently working slightly ahead of schedule on rehab. Supposedly back around mid-August.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I thought the peak was about 30? If it’s 26, that would suggest Adley is already starting his downhill.
    • I feel like this team may be a little older than the past teams. Definitely a good start for the hitters. We normally get trounced in this league.
    • You will see a good pitcher no matter what. We have the #3 pitching staff in MLB and guys are pitching well from top to bottom of the rotation. 
    • Well being honest....it is hard not to.  They were that bad.   Although for me I thought he looked just as bad in the field.   It was almost as if he had never played baseball before.  At times he could barely throw to first base. 
    • At least we now know he has pro-grade HR power. Aberdeen's a tough park to hit them out and he cleared the fence easily. Im encouraged.
    • What can we get for him in a trade? Does he even have any trade value remaining?
    • To put things into context, Jackson has so far an .898 OPS at AAA in his age 20 season (he started the season at over 1.000 before his call-up, I don't think it's a stretch to suggest that going up and struggling might've had some effect on his numbers afterwards).  Mayo at age 20 had a .782 OPS between A+ and AA. Basallo will turn 20 in 60 days. He's about 2/3 of a year younger than Holliday. In his age 19 season he currently has an .810 OPS in AA. In Jackson's age 19 season he had a .928 OPS at Bowie before moving on to AAA where he OPS'd .796 in 91 PA.  Unless there is important statistic evidence suggesting that ISO at the minor league level is a more important indicator of future success than say wRC+ or OPS (and if this were true, we should be encouraged by the fact that Jackson has gone from a .176 ISO--.133 at the same level--to .196 ISO from age 19 to 20) I don't really see any argument for putting Basallo or Mayo above them. With all due respect--because I think you are putting forth some interesting points and almost convinced me before I did this little exercise--I think you are likely subconsciously being affected too strongly by Jackson's 36 PA at the ML level. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...