Jump to content

The Nick Markakis 2,000th hit countdown thread


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

 

Nick's first ht of 2020 was a walk-off homer. He's now tied with Carlton Fisk for 135th all-time, at 2,356 hits. He's now chasing Allan Trammell at 2,365. Realistically, Nick probably won't get much past 2,400 hits in 2020, if he gets there at all with the shortened season. He'd need 45 hits to get there, and the Braves have 46 games left to play.

 

o

 

If Markakis finishes his career with 2,501 or more hits, that will be closer to 3,000 than it is to 2,000 ........ and that will be quite the accomplishment, in relation to the OP of this thread.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

If Markakis finishes his career with 2,501 or more hits, that will be closer to 3,000 than it is to 2,000 ........ and that will be quite the accomplishment, in relation to the OP of this thread.

 

o

I think if Nick is still playing next year I will change the thread title to 2,500.   He lost a lot of ground last year with the injury and this year with the shortened season, and I think any shot he had at 3,000 hits has evaporated (I did not think his chances were that good anyway).    But 2,500 would be a great accomplishment and put him in the top 100 all time (with a couple extra hits).     He's fourth among active players (behind Pujols, Cabrera and Cano) and if you look behind him, nos. 5-14 have no real shot at ever getting to where Nick is now.    The first guy who has a shot to pass Nick is Elvis Andrus (1731 hits at age 31), and I would not bet on him doing it.   Here is where Nick was at various ages compared to some other younger guys now:

35 2355

34 2237

33 2052

32 1889

31 1728 (Andrus 1731)

30 1547 (Castro 1631, Altuve 1579)

29 1370

28 1198 (Trout 1338)

27 1073 (Machado 1211, Harper 1078, Bogaerts 1037)

Note that the players listed still have the rest of this season to add to their totals compared to where Nick was at the same baseball age.    Realistically, it will be at least 2025 before anybody passes Nick's current total.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

If Markakis finishes his career with 2,501 or more hits, that will be closer to 3,000 than it is to 2,000 ........ and that will be quite the accomplishment, in relation to the OP of this thread.

 

o

 

 

22 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

I think if Nick is still playing next year I will change the thread title to 2,500.   

 

o

 

PLEASE keep it the way that it is ??? It only serves to accentuate how far Nick has come. Imagine if Nick actually comes within a 100 or 200 of 3,000 hits someday ........ that would be SOOOOOO cool to see the original title of the thread. 

It's your thread, and your call, Frank ........ I happen to love the contrast.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OFFNY said:

 

 

o

 

PLEASE keep it the way that it is ??? It only serves to accentuate how far Nick has come. Imagine if Nick actually comes within a 100 or 200 of 3,000 hits someday ........ that would be SOOOOOO cool to see the original title of the thread. 

It's your thread, and your call, Frank ........ I happen to love the contrast.

 

o

We will see.   When I started the thread, I fully expected that he would blow well past 2,000 hits.    After all, he was only in his age 33 season at the time, and still playing very well.     And honestly, 2,500 hits is a far bigger accomplishment - only 101 players have done it, compared to 287 who made it as far as 2,000.   Maybe I'll just start a new thread entirely if/when Nick gets close to that number.     There's no guarantee that he will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

We will see. When I started the thread, I fully expected that he would blow well past 2,000 hits. After all, he was only in his age 33 season at the time, and still playing very well. And frankly, 2,500 hits is a far bigger accomplishment - only 101 players have done it, compared to 287 who made it as far as 2,000. Maybe I'll just start a new thread entirely if/when Nick gets close to that number. There's no guarantee that he will.

 

o

 

If you started a new thread, that would be great, Frank ....... and you just KNOOOOOOW that I will keep this old one going. ) B|

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/9/2020 at 11:25 AM, Frobby said:

30 1547 (Castro 1631, Altuve 1579)

 

Didn't realize Altuve was 30 already.  He is one I was thinking would have a great shot at 3000 hits, but not so much anymore.  I know he was hurt last year some, but already was slowing down and (SSS as with everything this year) he is really struggling so far in 2020.  And the Astros have him for 4 more years at 29M/year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, murph said:

Didn't realize Altuve was 30 already.  He is one I was thinking would have a great shot at 3000 hits, but not so much anymore.  I know he was hurt last year some, but already was slowing down and (SSS as with everything this year) he is really struggling so far in 2020.  And the Astros have him for 4 more years at 29M/year!

It is almost as if something changed recently...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

It is almost as if something changed recently...

His career couldn't have been trash can lead the whole time, unless you are referring to some other rumors I missed about him.  Although I am sure he would love a tip or two on the pitches which are coming right now! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick picked up his 500th double a couple of days ago and is now at 501.   He’s 62nd on that particular list and the next five are all Hall of Famers: Dawson 503, Alomar 504, Perez 505, Ruth 506, Henderson 510.   Nice company!

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick got his 2,366th hit tonight to pass Alan Trammell for 134th on the all time list.    Appropriately, the next guy up on the list is Lou Whitaker, at 2,369.   Nick’s hit was his 504th double, tied with Roberto Alomar.    

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...