Jump to content

Fangraphs KATOH Projections for Top 100 Prospects


NCRaven

Recommended Posts

Posted

Fangraphs - "KATOH produces a WAR forecast for a player’s first six major-league seasons. It incorporates age, offensive performance, defensive performance, and other characteristics from the past two seasons. There are certainly drawbacks to scouting the stat line, but due to their objectivity, the projections can be useful in identifying prospects who might be overlooked or overrated."

The Orioles had five in the top 100 although all were between 50 and 100.  Interestingly, the top Oriole prospect was D.J. Stewart at #56 with a projected WAR of 5.0.  Followed by Tanner Scott (#60 and 5.0), Austin Hays (#74 and 4.4), Zac Lowther (#78 and 4.4) and Chance Sisco (#85 and 4.3).

Posted
3 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

Five in the top 100 is nice, but that Hays WAR would be very disappointing.

Honestly so would Stewart and Sisco.

If they can't squeeze more than a win a year out of these guys it isn't going to be pretty.

Of course #1 on their list is only at 13.3 WAR and they have Vlad Jr down at #15 at 8.8.

They don't seem to project anyone as a true star.

Posted
9 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

LOL..yes but he definitely has a bat. This is analysis at its worst.

It's not analysis at all, it's a projection system.  No one said "hey, let's discount Mountcastle".  The numbers were plugged into a system and out comes a projection and the players were ranked that way.  Mountcastle is likely hurt by poor defensive numbers and his struggles initially in AA.  

I like Mountcastle as a prospect, but it's not worth getting upset about one projection system not liking him.

Posted
7 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Call it what you want but this kid seems pretty solid. If he's an average fielder, so what. There are a lot of those guys in MLB.

Sure.  There is no doubt he's a solid prospect if he can be an average fielder at second or third.  The question is, can he be an average fielder?

On a side note, it is odd to me as a layman that someone who is large, strong, fit, young and healthy can have throwing issues that can not be fixed through a change in workout or technique.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

On a side note, it is odd to me as a layman that someone who is large, strong, fit, young and healthy can have throwing issues that can not be fixed through a change in workout or technique.

My guess is that the Orioles believe that the issues can be fixed adequately for him to stay in the infield.  If they're wrong, I think the bat still plays in left field.

Having said that, it was surprising to me that DJ Stewart was highest and Mountcastle didn't make it at all.

Posted
1 minute ago, NCRaven said:

My guess is that the Orioles believe that the issues can be fixed adequately for him to stay in the infield.  If they're wrong, I think the bat still plays in left field.

I think it does as well, the problem is the O's already have a number of guys who should be playing left/first/dh.

Posted
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think it does as well, the problem is the O's already have a number of guys who should be playing left/first/dh.

So trade someone.   Problem solved.    

Posted
On 2/9/2018 at 7:23 PM, Can_of_corn said:

Honestly so would Stewart and Sisco.

If they can't squeeze more than a win a year out of these guys it isn't going to be pretty.

Of course #1 on their list is only at 13.3 WAR and they have Vlad Jr down at #15 at 8.8.

They don't seem to project anyone as a true star.

That’s the nature of KATOH, since everything’s based on the law of averages.    In reality, there probably will be about 20 players a year who debut in the majors and top 13 WAR in their years under team control.   See, for example, the class of 2011: https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2011-debuts.shtml.  22 guys over 13 WAR and all of them were under team control through 2017.

Posted

I know KATOH is fairly new, but I'd like to see how players that have reached the majors have performed relative to their prospect status. 

I'm guessing favorable.  

I have nothing to base this on rather than I believe in performance (especially in the upper minors) over unrealized tools/potential.  They also had Mancini in their top 100 last year where as no other major publication had him in there. 

I like Lowther.  Command and just misses bats, stuff aside.  

Posted
On 2/13/2018 at 10:34 AM, birdwatcher55 said:

Call it what you want but this kid seems pretty solid. If he's an average fielder, so what. There are a lot of those guys in MLB.

If he's going to be an average fielder, it's not going to be on the left side of the infield.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Elias spending the $25M early, Roster Resource has us at $122M tonight, 19th in MLB. If we close Burnes, we hit 13th for a minute.    Any AAV between 29 and 44 lands us between SFG at $167M and BOS at $150M. That'd just be a momentary crest - we land Burnes to make $65M in new 2025 salary and we're near done while most of the Top 50 free agents still have jobs to get. But to the OP point, that'd set us at ~$160 with all the studs the cheapest they'll ever be again in 2025.    We will get to reconfigure about $35M next winter when Eflin, Mullins and Sanchez walk, and of course there's the calculation/hope O'Neill plays well enough to opt out. I do think the O's financial analysts deserve a little credit for finding a contract balance where the CLUB is hoping the player opts out too.
    • It's not SA vs TO or the platoon, it's 2024 ( Hayes, Cowser, Ced, and Tony vs Cowser, Ced Heston and TO and Maybe Mateo. All things being equal (injuries), I bet the 2025 outfield.
    • Adley needs to turn his trend line around to justify roughly 20% of core payroll.  2025 will be an important season for him IMO.
    • Thx for laying this out. I would also add that if think about budget in terms over multiple years (any +/- carried over), there definitely is ample room or excess in 2026 as it currently stands with nearly $70M likely dropping off (estimates per roster resource) $18M Eflin $8.5M Sanchez $8M Seranthony $8M OHearn $5.6M Soto $8.7M Mullins $3.2M Mateo $2.5M no buyouts of Kimbrel + Jimenez  $5.7M Mounty (likely to be moved by 2026) $3.2M Urias (likely to be moved by 2026) A lot of those $$$ could be backfilled with pre-arb internal guys, leaving ample room to supplement and/or carry over to more than offset future years climbing arb increases.
    • last i checked, it was one plus a throw in. When they become throw ins, because the GM owes the former prospect playing time, they are no longer solid.
    • Now if someone could find a list of Boras clients with respect to their WAR, that would be interesting. Pre FA and after.
    • Eric Longenhagen's chat today on Ethan mentions a flaw that EL regards as so damaging as to reduce him to mid 1st round. 12:45 Refugee: Appreciate your insight on Over-Slot recently. Do you consider Ethan Holliday’s swing flaw being identified this early something that works for (he’s not even 18 yet) or against him? 12:45 Eric A Longenhagen: Fugee is talking about this podcast appearance: Ep. 125: Jim Callis and Eric Longenhagen join the show. A Draft Lottery Preview. | Patreon 12:47 Eric A Longenhagen: I’m not sure it’s correctable, I think his hands just work in a way that leaves him very vulnerable to many fastballs up/away. I have him more middle of the first round. 72% contact guy on the showcase circuit, hit .240 and slugged .380 when you add up his entire multi-year showcase sample. Love the raw power potential, don’t think the performance merits a top 5 pick. But the Colorado/Holliday connection and Washington’s willingness to take guys like Elijah Green looms.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...