Jump to content

Top President / EVP Candidates?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, wildcard said:

So what do you think happens to the Angelos Law firm?

Honestly, anything I’d say would be pure speculation, because I know very little about how the firm is structured, who really controls the client relationships if Peter’s gone, and what the culture of the firm really is.    What I do know is that at any firm, if a lawyer who controls client relationships is unhappy with how he or she is being treated or compensated, that lawyer always has the option to leave and convince the clients to move to the lawyer’s new firm.  No law firm “owns” its clients; clients under the ethics rules can terminate a relationship with a law firm at any time without any advance notice.  Peter might have had the ability to convince the clients to stay with him; Lou doesn’t necessarily have that ability, and if not, it’s hard to see how the law firm will simply be owned and run by him.    But again, I don’t have any real information about what the relationships are like there.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 747
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, wildcard said:

So what do you think happens to the Angelos Law firm?

I think there are three main possibilities: the firm continues, but with newly named partners (that is, owners) that might include Lou or John Angelos), with the firm's profits shared among among those who bring in business and/or do the legal work, as agreed upon by those new partners (with Lou or John, if either or both become partners, probably receiving a small share since they will be busy with other things, assuming they or their mother inherits the team and MLB approves that transfer); or the firm disbands but is reconstituted under a new name, by new partners who own the new firm, probably not including John or Lou Angelos, but, if they are included, giving them limited shares of the profits as above; or the firm disbands and its lawyers scatter to existing firms or newly formed, smaller firms.

In any event, I think it's very doubtful that the law firm is a source of substantial or long-term revenue to John or Louis Angelos, or that, after a transition period they might be heavily involved in as executors of their father's estate, it occupies much of their time. There is one business in which they would have an interest -- if MLB's owners permit. That's the Orioles, and that business owns a majority of MASN. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Honestly, anything I’d say would be pure speculation, because I know very little about how the firm is structured, who really controls the client relationships if Peter’s gone, and what the culture of the firm really is.    What I do know is that at any firm, if a lawyer who controls client relationships is unhappy with how he or she is being treated or compensated, that lawyer always has the option to leave and convince the clients to move to the lawyer’s new firm.  No law firm “owns” its clients; clients under the ethics rules can terminate a relationship with a law firm at any time without any advance notice.  Peter might have had the ability to convince the clients to stay with him; Lou doesn’t necessarily have that ability, and if not, it’s hard to see how the law firm will simply be owned and run by him.    But again, I don’t have any real information about what the relationships are like there.    

I agree with that, FWIW. Lou might "inherit" some clients who agree to stay with a firm headed by him because his name is Angelos. If that happens, some of the firm's 59 lawyers (the number listed on its website) might agree, for a while, to work for a firm headed by Lou. But it's hard to see how that could last very long.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I agree with that, FWIW. Lou might "inherit" some clients who agree to stay with a firm headed by him because his name is Angelos. If that happens, some of the firm's 59 lawyers (the number listed on its website) might agree, for a while, to work for a firm headed by Lou. But it's hard to see how that could last very long.

The structure of that firm is so different than the ones at which you and I have worked, it’s hard to know what people there might be thinking.   And of course, moving contingent fee cases is more complicated than moving hourly fee cases, in terms of how the old firm gets compensated if a settlement or judgment is reached after a case is moved.   It will be interesting to see how that plays out.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The structure of that firm is so different than the ones at which you and I have worked, it’s hard to know what people there might be thinking.   And of course, moving contingent fee cases is more complicated than moving hourly fee cases, in terms of how the old firm gets compensated if a settlement or judgment is reached after a case is moved.   It will be interesting to see how that plays out.   

I can also see this not being an issue.

There are times with families with business ties with another family business, will keep that relationship, even when the kids are running things.

My father did his business there, so that's why I am there, loyalty.

Younger generation don't understand this or get this, but I do.

I have a friend of mine, his business CPA retired and he kept his business with his daughter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The structure of that firm is so different than the ones at which you and I have worked, it’s hard to know what people there might be thinking.   And of course, moving contingent fee cases is more complicated than moving hourly fee cases, in terms of how the old firm gets compensated if a settlement or judgment is reached after a case is moved.   It will be interesting to see how that plays out.   

That's all true. I have seen a number of similar firms (in New York), probably a little smaller and far less prominent in NY than the Angelos firm is in MD, fall apart pretty quickly when a heavy hitter dies or leaves. And those firms appeared to have taken some steps to prepare for the future that Peter Angelos appears not to have taken. There is a lot for the partners to fight over, but not much to hold them together.

The details don't have much of an effect on anything Oriole-related. It's virtually certain that over the long haul neither Angelos son is going to be like Peter Angelos (or Edward Bennett Williams), spending significant time running a law firm and earning substantial profits from that firm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

That's all true. I have seen a number of similar firms (in New York), probably a little smaller and far less prominent in NY than the Angelos firm is in MD, fall apart pretty quickly when a heavy hitter dies or leaves. And those firms appeared to have taken some steps to prepare for the future that Peter Angelos appears not to have taken. There is a lot for the partners to fight over, but not much to hold them together.

The details don't have much of an effect on anything Oriole-related. It's virtually certain that over the long haul neither Angelos son is going to be like Peter Angelos (or Edward Bennett Williams), spending significant time running a law firm and earning substantial profits from that firm.

Based on what? I think the one has been very involved with running MASN full time for years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Absltgreek said:

https://twitter.com/JonHeyman/status/1052256318659158016

 

I like it. 

Even though this is an older article, I like her and I like the idea. Young, analytical, if they give her free reign could be really good.

 

https://sabr.org/research/dodgers-assistant-general-manager-kim-ng-ready-make-jump-top-job

 

 

I would be absolutely thrilled if the Orioles hired Ng. Colletti - not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Also I'll say this regarding this offense, and maybe it's just me... I feel like we've faced some really, really good pitching.  I don't have the time to research the teams we've faced and where they rank on the pitching spectrum, but I feel like we've seen some teams dealing really well against us.
    • Expectation is everything. If you dropped this exact team into 2021 the board would be saying this was their favorite team ever.
    • Fortunately, we now have xBA, which eliminates having to guess in babip is due to bad luck. His xBA is .199
    • I think it's one of those things where the sum is currently greater than the parts, and because of that it's hard to see how we continue winning at this pace given all the struggles in the lineup at the moment.  IF (and I realize it's a big if) but IF Urias, Cowser, Hays, Mullins, McCann, and Santander to an extent, heck and even Henderson lately,  don't start hitting better it's hard to see us continuing on that incredible 107 win pace.  That's quite a few holes, or semi-holes, in the lineup to overcome.  We can't count on a Westburg hit followed by an Adley homerun in the 9th every night to win games when the offense is comatose for 8 innings.  Now clearly if the starting pitching keeps performing the way they are then we will need to score fewer runs overall as we will be giving up fewer.  But I'm not sure that will happen.  Just as we are hoping some of the hitters get back to their career norms, it's also possible some of the pitchers revert back to more normal levels, and not the incredible pitchers they have been.  Combine that with all the injuries (Well, Grayson) and recovering injuries (Means, Bradish) I'd be a lot more comfortable if the offense was clicking on all, or at least more, cylinders.   I'm super jacked about the record, and the pace we are winning at.  I've been HUGELY enjoying watching Westburg become this budding star, seeing Adley hit so well, and have loved being wrong about my expectations for O'Hearn, Mountcastle and yes, even Mateo to this point.  But we DO have some real issues that need addressed, or else I'm afraid we are going to fade seriously in the next 3/4s of the season.
    • Just going by the eye test, I haven’t seen him get “unlucky” on hardly anything he’s put in play, let’s put it that way. He’s been horrid. 
    • Yeah it’s basically a recap of the first month of the season that includes interviews with some of the TV/radio guys and a few players. Westburg featured prominently on that front, with a little McCann and Cowser mixed in as well. Also Grayson. Nothing groundbreaking but a worthwhile watch, especially on an off day. 
    • I enjoyed it though I have to admit I don't remember much of the first one.  I just finished the second.  Lots of small little interviews and thoughts from different guys as they run down the season up until the 2nd game of the Yankees series.  See some behind the scenes stuff like Cowser and Jackson going behind the monster to sign it.  If you've got 40 minutes to kill, it's fun as a big O's fan.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...