Jump to content

Who do you want the Orioles to pick at 1-1?


Frobby

Who do you want the Orioles to pick at 1-1?  

172 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you want the Orioles to pick at 1-1?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 06/03/19 at 22:55

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Justinlstn said:

I know my choice is unpopular and won't happen but I rather have Vaughn. If Rutschman wasn't a catcher I'd be fine taking him. Vaughn is an elite bat that won't be hampered by playing a brutal position like Rutschman. 

You could always just move Rutschman to first.  Would get you a switch hitting first baseman that was more than six feet tall.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is Adley's bat is better than the other potential picks.  And he is a switch hitter.  And his defense is outstanding.  And he is at a position where working with your developing pitching staff together will be a key to winning.  And his character is off the charts.     Hard to see the scenario that he is not the pick as he is head and shoulders above the other 3, imho.    A Buster Posey, 41.2 WAR in his 10 years to date or Joe Mauer  55 WAR career would be just fine with me.   And then move on to find another position to upgrade for our next winner.    But, of course, I will trust ME to know best.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

The thing is Adley's bat is better than the other potential picks.  And he is a switch hitter.  And his defense is outstanding.  And he is at a position where working with your developing pitching staff together will be a key to winning.  And his character is off the charts.     Hard to see the scenario that he is not the pick as he is head and shoulders above the other 3, imho.    A Buster Posey, 41.2 WAR in his 10 years to date or Joe Mauer  55 WAR career would be just fine with me.   And then move on to find another position to upgrade for our next winner.    But, of course, I will trust ME to know best.  

Mauer?  He held the Twins back all these years!  Now that he's finally gone and they have a real first baseman they are taking it to the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

The thing is Adley's bat is better than the other potential picks.  And he is a switch hitter.  And his defense is outstanding.  And he is at a position where working with your developing pitching staff together will be a key to winning.  And his character is off the charts.     Hard to see the scenario that he is not the pick as he is head and shoulders above the other 3, imho.    A Buster Posey, 41.2 WAR in his 10 years to date or Joe Mauer  55 WAR career would be just fine with me.   And then move on to find another position to upgrade for our next winner.    But, of course, I will trust ME to know best.  

Yeah if Adley doesnt turn out to be an elite bat he still could end up like Wieters.  If you pick a first baseman and his bat doesnt turn out to be elite you end up with a bust 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, atomic said:

Yeah if Adley doesnt turn out to be an elite bat he still could end up like Wieters.  If you pick a first baseman and his bat doesnt turn out to be elite you end up with a bust 

He'd have to be a Keith Hernandez level defender for the bat not to be there and still have some value.  And Hernandez was still a really good hitter, just didn't have a lot of power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weams said:

No JJ Bleday?

I like Bleday, I just think he is out for 1:1.  

 

11 hours ago, Tryptamine said:

Not sure I understand why Abrams is ok, but not Vaughn. Yeah, Abrams has crazy speed and very good defense but the bat is a big question mark. Vaughn is a much safer pick with elite offensive potential. Yeah he doesn't play a premium position but it doesn't matter how good your defense is if you can't hit.

Abrams can hit, he just didnt put up 25 homeruns in his freshman year of college.  Abrams just isnt getting the media hype.  He has tons of potential and with some work and about 20 pounds on his frame he has the chance to really be something.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

He'd have to be a Keith Hernandez level defender for the bat not to be there and still have some value.  And Hernandez was still a really good hitter, just didn't have a lot of power.

Not if he sticks at catcher.

Which is an option.  If the pick is a catcher.

Not if he is a first baseman.  

Which was the point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hallas said:

I’d be happy with Witt or Adley.  I’m not as big on the other two at 1:1.  I’m just not sure why we’d take Abrams over Witt at 1:1 unless there is something everyone but the O’s are missing in this situation.

I agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One other variable about Witt is that as a high school phenom, he has not had to deal with anything approaching failure on a baseball field yet and then having to work to change his approach.   Adley apparently had to rework his swing and approach after his freshman year because his performance dropped coming from high school to college ball.    Some high school phenoms make the adjustment to the minors, others do not do near as well.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Curse of the Bamdino said:

Rutschman wasn't my first choice, but he is an Oriole now (well, pending signing), and I hope he does well.

That said, I can't shake the feeling that we're going to revisit this draft years from now and lament not having taken BWJ.

You could also be dancing happy feet in a few years, if BWJ is a wash out.

Note saying that he is.

You just never know about these things, when you draft em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Well this is just blatantly incorrect.  He did have a .580 OPS in May followed by a .679 in June.  Over the last 28 days, he has a .738 OPS and over the last week its .850.  Throughout this entire stretch his batted ball data remained strong.  Are the first few weeks of the season carrying his numbers?  Sure.  But to say he has "like a .500 OPS" since the first few weeks of the season is massive stretch. This also isn't taking into account the defensive dropoff from Cowser to Kjerstad.  The good news is there is plenty of room for both of them to get regular at-bats. 
    • Think I saw that barrios was the brewers 21st ranked prospect or something. If we could’ve gotten a year and a half of civale for someone like Liranzo or Sosa, that would’ve been extremely tempting. 
    • The best and easiest way to clear the biggest logjam is to trade O'Hearn for a quality reliever or a prospect. It's a classic sell high move, and it's much easier to trade for a non-closer reliever than it is to trade for a starter. There are plenty of contending teams that need offensive help. And most importantly, it clears the DH slot for Kjerstad and Mayo.  And Kjerstad shouldn't be sent down again. He's been mishandled enough by Elias and Hyde already, and he's a potential 40 HR bat with upside much higher than a few players who aren't part of the long-term future of this team and that he should already be taking at bats from, including Hays (even against LHP), Mullins (who's going to inevitably slump again and still has terrible offensive numbers despite a red hot 2+ weeks), and O'Hearn. 
    • Kimbrel, so far, is pretty well in line with his career.
    • Mariners offense is anemic. Not one starter last night had an OPS above .750. O's should win one more to take the series and a sweep is a real possibility. Seattle is in a weak division and Astros could overtake them to win the division.
    • Thanks for sharing. But man that graph triggers me. I have spent decades editing graphs made by newbie grad students. I would love to tell the creator for goodness sake reverse those axes so the “good” bullpens have positive residuals and not negative residuals!! 😀 Sorry for aside geek frustrations. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...