Jump to content

Poll: Which Orioles player will get dealt in the next 10 days?


Greg Pappas

Which Orioles player will get dealt in the next 10 days?  

144 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Orioles player will get dealt in the next 10 days?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 07/26/19 at 16:00

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I don't expect much for Givens.  If you were in the playoffs would you really trust him in a high leverage spot?  Even when he's going good I never completely trusted him.  Always suspect against LHB.  I'll take two more 17 yo or a low A player with upside.

Yeah. His strikeout numbers look good, but he is not exactly reliable out there. Personally, I like the guy, but I'm pretty eager to jump ship from the USS Givens while he's having a decent stretch. I don't know that he's going to be very good for whomever trades for him. Perfectly fine with a Cashner return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

Yeah. His strikeout numbers look good, but he is not exactly reliable out there. Personally, I like the guy, but I'm pretty eager to jump ship from the USS Givens while he's having a decent stretch. I don't know that he's going to be very good for whomever trades for him. Perfectly fine with a Cashner return. 

If three teams are indeed interested in Givens I would expect the return to be higher than two lottery tickets.  Elias had been trying to dump Cashner's contract since before the season started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If three teams are indeed interested in Givens I would expect the return to be higher than two lottery tickets.  Elias had been trying to dump Cashner's contract since before the season started.

That would be great if the return is higher. I'm just pretty fine with it if it's not. Because I see a scenario in which he suddenly tanks in his final 2 or 3 appearances before the deadline and his market vanishes. Let's flip him and be quick about it. Dude makes me nervous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

That would be great if the return is higher. I'm just pretty fine with it if it's not. Because I see a scenario in which he suddenly tanks in his final 2 or 3 appearances before the deadline and his market vanishes. Let's flip him and be quick about it. Dude makes me nervous. 

This is his fifth season in the majors.  You think two or three poor appearances is going to significantly change how teams evaluate him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

This is his fifth season in the majors.  You think two or three poor appearances is going to significantly change how teams evaluate him?

And the last two of those years have been his worst by far. The peripherals are looking good and all but he's proven that he can't really close games reliably (5 blown saves this year), and he's prone to losing command at random. So yeah, if he blows up before the deadline, teams are going to look elsewhere for their backend bullpen help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

And the last two of those years have been his worst by far. The peripherals are looking good and all but he's proven that he can't really close games reliably (5 blown saves this year), and he's prone to losing command at random. So yeah, if he blows up before the deadline, teams are going to look elsewhere for their backend bullpen help. 

I'm going to disagree.  I think teams these days look past hot and cold spells and at the total body of work and how that player projects going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm going to disagree.  I think teams these days look past hot and cold spells and at the total body of work and how that player projects going forward.

With the extra year of control, you may be right. I still could see his value plummeting if he tanks it hard. He probably won't do that though, and it'll be fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I’ve changed my mind about Villar. He has almost no value, but he will almost certainly be non-tendered by the team, so I think he will be traded on the grounds that something is better than nothing. The return will be minimal, but if he’s non-tendered, the return will be zero.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Philip said:

I think I’ve changed my mind about Villar. He has almost no value, but he will almost certainly be non-tendered by the team, so I think he will be traded on the grounds that something is better than nothing. The return will be minimal, but if he’s non-tendered, the return will be zero.

Addition by subtraction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The poll closes this Friday (7/26/19) at Noon.

  • It's evident that nearly everyone expects Givens to be dealt, with 134 votes out of 143 voters.
  • Over half of the voters feel Villar will also be moved.
  • Everyone else listed comes in under 12%, with Mancini the 3rd likeliest.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

The poll closes this Friday (7/26/19) at Noon.

  • It's evident that nearly everyone expects Givens to be dealt, with 134 votes out of 143 voters.
  • Over half of the voters feel Villar will also be moved.
  • Everyone else listed comes in under 12%, with Mancini the 3rd likeliest.

I’d like to see us deal Givens and maybe Fry.

Id love to cash in on Trey but don’t see us getting fair value

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Hopefully their getting desperate! I’d like to get Moniak and Cole Irvin

Moniak would be interesting.  He seems to have figured something out at AA but may not have the ceiling that people once thought.  Irvin could step in immediately to replace Eshelman or Brooks in the rotation.  

I'd do that deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Gibson signed very early in the offseason and was never really a true option of being brought back by Elias and co. If you want to go with someone they could have actually signed for depth then Michael Lorenzen would of made sense as a swingman as he had to wait forever to finally get a deal and it was a bargain for Texas at 4mill. Even then, would he have been fine signing here as a non guaranteed starter; hard to say but don’t think there was any attempt on the O’s to do so.
    • The Britton trade allowed the Yankees to trade some guys that would have been subjected to the 40 man crunch (Tate for example).
    • You can get Pit/PA here. Scroll down to the Team Pitches Batting section and sort by Pit/PA. Lots of good stuff on that page.
    • It will be interesting to see if a small July trade occurs in the style of the Rays or Dodgers with stuffed 40-man rosters. Michael Busch and Bryan Hudson having been guys the Dodgers moved along last winter for off 40 man types is a level  no one else is at, but if Orioles PD success rate stays high they may get closer than most of the other 29 clubs.    How many real keepers are on Delmarva right now?     How many of McDermott, Young, Johnson, Bright, De Leon, Baumeister, Forret, etc. become full time Orioles?
    • It’s a good trade deadline question. It’s not super common, but looking ahead at 40-man roster crunch does affect the prospects who become available for teams with really deep 40-man rosters and strong upper level minors systems. For example, it almost certainly played a role in the Rays trading Seth Johnson. More recently, the Dodgers had some 40-man crunch this off-season and that motivated a handful of trades.  However, I don’t think the Orioles are to that point. They still have enough 40-man space for the prospects who will clearly need to be added.
    • Correct.  I was never a big Mountcastle guy but I didn’t, to the best of my knowledge, say he wouldn’t make it, just that he wouldn’t be an 800-900 OPS type of guy.  Mountcastle’s hit tool (.293 minor league avg) has allowed him to overcome his chase tendencies.  Stowers (.263 minor league avg), I don’t believe, has as good a hit tool.  He’s going to have to hit 25+ homers, minimum, to be a .780 hitter.   He’s capable of it.  I’m just not as confident about it as you are.  I think he’s looked good both ways.  
    • Interesting.. I wonder if he could improve a bit by switching to a more aggressive approach, similar to the evolution Gunnar made last year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...