Jump to content

What did Bleier do?


AceKing

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Tx Oriole said:

I don’t get it? Seems like Flores is the bad guy to some. But since when is it okay for a player to bad mouth a coach? Davis couldn’t make the play. Flores gets fussed at by the pitcher because he positioned Davis in an area where Davis couldn’t make the play? 

Waving a player to follow you to the tunnel and ranting back and forth in front of the cameras in the dugout and pointing a finger right in Armstrong’s face?...unless Bleier called him a personal name, it is hard to see how one justifies a public display like that in the dugout from supposedly someone more mature and also a coach.  That is why there are clubhouses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

+1. I don't know why people are in a rush to discount 2+ years of good numbers as small sample size and then nontender him based on one bad year. I would hope they can agree to terms without arb but if forced I could think of worse uses of $1M. Unless he is a disruptive hothead in the clubhouse, that is.

There are several reasons to non tender Bleier:

1) He will be a 33 year old guy coming off a bad season on a team going through a youth movement.  Let a younger player have the roster spot.

2) He is a reliever that does not strikeout many batters and therefore he outperformed his peripherals in  the previous years.   

3) There is the risk that maybe he can't get back to his pre surgery self.

4) Considering 1 through 3 if he is non tendered then maybe no team gives him a major league contract. 

So maybe the O's can non tender him and re-sign him to a minor league contract this off season and save part of the $1m that he may get if he is tendered.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, back on p1 I read Bleier jumped off the mound,  threw his arms in the air, almost rushed past Hyde to the point that Hyde had to reach for the ball. Maybe Florres said something about that disrespect before Bleier questioned positioning. That might elicit a response defending Hyde.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tntoriole said:

Waving a player to follow you to the tunnel and ranting back and forth in front of the cameras in the dugout and pointing a finger right in Armstrong’s face?...unless Bleier called him a personal name, it is hard to see how one justifies a public display like that in the dugout from supposedly someone more mature and also a coach.  That is why there are clubhouses. 

If I may say so, he probably wanted Bleier in the tunnel precisely to avoid having a prolonged argument in front of the cameras.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Frobby said:

If I may say so, he probably wanted Bleier in the tunnel precisely to avoid having a prolonged argument in front of the cameras.   

Yes. I don’t understand why people here are so quick to pass judgement on the coach. Bleier had no justification for throwing a tantrum about the defense or anything else. Except maybe his awful pitching.

Heck, if he could occasionally get the ball down when he pitches maybe he wouldn’t be looking at Korea or a MiL deal next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Buck, he was extremely disliked by some of his players during his stint with the Yankees and he wore out his welcome in Arizona pretty fast despite winning. He was extremely over bearing when he was a fresh manager and admitted as much in interviews when first hired as Orioles manager. Also remember that there were grumbles about the clubhouse culture, over reliance on vets, etc, during Bucks last couple of years. I really like Buck and think he was a good manager, but no one is perfect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

If I may say so, he probably wanted Bleier in the tunnel precisely to avoid having a prolonged argument in front of the cameras.   

I have never seen an Oriole coach do that in the dugout with a player...ever.   Earl maybe but coaches?  Never seen it that I recall.  

Watch the clip again from ESPN... when Flores comes back out of the tunnel, he is STILL ranting and pushing his finger right in Armstrong’s face.  We will just disagree, but I think him going off was unnecessary and unprofessional.   If he was pushing that finger of his in a lot of guys faces, he very may well have had gotten his lights punched out.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's low hanging fruit to laugh at the doom-and-gloom crowd, the sky-is-falling Chicken Littles, and the run-for-the-hills Billies.  So, fruit duly plucked. 🤣 However, there is some truth within their pessimistic outlook.  It's absolutely fair to be concerned about our pitching.  Who's to say who is right or wrong in how much concern there should be?  Well, we all have a say.  It's why we're here.  The beloved @Roy Firestone is admittedly the most pessimistic Game Thread poster in history, yet no one questions his love of the O's.  Nor should we berate those with strongly pessimistic views about our chances as being less of a fan.   It's just my two cents, but I think it's readily apparent that we need to add to our pitching and I believe Elias will address it.  A quality starter and a reliever or two would likely do wonders for the team... and our collective sanity.   I just don't feel we'd need to deal Holliday, or Mayo, or Basallo to get there.  Then again, I may be wrong.  
    • Who are the Os top three? Burnes, GRod, and…….?
    • There never is going to be an “all in” year.   Elias made the mostly in move by getting Burnes and then the baseball gods decided to cut down Bradish, Means, and Wells.  Coulombe too.  The Dodgers are “all in” every single year.  1 WS trophy in a shortened season. Elias is going to make some moves but he’s not dipping into the top 3 prospects and maybe not even Kjerstad.   You can’t make a habit of trading guys with 6+ years of control for players with minimal amounts of control.  Yeah, this was the Burnes year and we got some bad luck.  Maybe we can still piece it together but Elias is only going to do that up to a point. As far as next year, who knows.  
    • I don't disagree at all.  I just put a much stronger emphasis on the top two guys in a series instead of three.  In most five game series your third starter will only pitch once.  Win the division and Kremer may make only 4 postseason starts even as our #3 all the way through the World Series.  That's why I would be focused on bullpen arms instead of a starter.  I love the idea of a starter with years of control to help offset the loss of Burnes to FA but I just don't see anyone that attractive that will be available.  This team's path through the AL is to have Burnes and Rodriguez be aces and the lineup to continue to be the best in the league regardless of who the third or fourth starters are.  
    • Your comment basically confirms what I said. You admit that Suarez and Irwin would regress, which they have. As a result of that regression, they are no longer reliable members of a powerful rotation. Therefore, we will slowly sink unless Mike gets someone better, and not just one, either. How is it an irrational fear to say we will slowly sink if we don’t make acquisitions? You just agreed that Suarez and Irwin aren’t adequate, so the concern is completely valid. Add to that Kremer’s spotty performance and injury concerns, and Povich remaining a huge question mark. Outside our top two, we got nobody dependable. And that’s just discussing the starters. your comment is curious because you try to refute what I was saying but instead confirm it, and you close by admitting they “have to improve on obvious needs”  We can debate what would constitute “going overboard,” but it’s clear from his past transactions that Mike cares a lot about the price he pays for an asset, so I think, far from overpaying, he’s more likely to duplicate what he did last season.
    • More should have been done to improve the team's rotation and Bullpen in the offseason.  Since John Angelos controlled the purse strings, additional spending was just not happening.  I put that on Angelos not Elias.  Does anyone think that Elias would not have liked say $30 million to add to 2024 payroll to strengthen the pitching?  This trade deadline is a time for Rubinstein to prove himself as much as Elias.
    • The Moose hits it!!!! Anyone who sets up their expectations to world series or bust needs good strong blood pressure meds. The year we win it will probably be a year we didn't expect. I'm enjoying the O's are relavent again after way to many years in the wilderness. Get to the dance and take your chances. That's my moto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...