Jump to content

Iglesias signs with O's


weams

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, NCRaven said:

Mountcastle to 1B and Davis to the bench or off the roster?  Or, Mountcastle to LF; Santander to RF; Mancini to 1B and Davis to the bench or off the roster?  Or Davis or Mancini replacing Nunez as DH?  Seems to me that the two players most likely to be affected by Mountcastle are Davis and Nunez, unless Mancini is traded.  Promoting Mountcastle has the potential to affect the roster in lots of different ways.

I'd love to say the logical move is to remove Davis from the roster, but the Orioles are not handling Davis logically. I would not be surprised to see Mancini moved, but if not, I think Mountcastle goes to left, Santander to RF, Mancini to 1B, and Davis to the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
27 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Per a Roch tweet, Iglesias showed up to camp today.    Nice to see a vet like that with no prior ties to the team showing up early.  https://mobile.twitter.com/masnRoch/status/1227955904974401536

So much for the bad clubhouse guy rep he had.  I'm going to accidentally call him Izturis several times this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

So much for the bad clubhouse guy rep he had.  I'm going to accidentally call him Izturis several times this season. 

Oh, me too.     Very similar players, though Iglesias is a little better with the bat (84 OPS+ vs. 64).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

So much for the bad clubhouse guy rep he had.  I'm going to accidentally call him Izturis several times this season. 

Maybe I've been living under a rock (no pun intended), but I don't remember ever seeing anything about Iglesias being a bad clubhouse guy. In terms of keeping his name straight maybe he'll throw us all a bone and make "Hero" by Enrigue Iglesias his walk up music ;)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Maybe I've been living under a rock (no pun intended), but I don't remember ever seeing anything about Iglesias being a bad clubhouse guy. In terms of keeping his name straight maybe he'll throw us all a bone and make "Hero" by Enrigue Iglesias his walk up music ;)

There was some stuff about him not being liked in Detroit.    He got along fine in Cincinnati last year.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

Per a Roch tweet, Iglesias showed up to camp today.    Nice to see a vet like that with no prior ties to the team showing up early.  https://mobile.twitter.com/masnRoch/status/1227955904974401536

It truly does. I hate the guys that feel entitled to a roster spot and show up late as they feel like its owned them.

A side question and nothing to do with Iglesias, I image as soon as a player reports to camp, the team will house them and feed them (per diem)????? I image non-roster invitees are not subject to the same benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

It truly does. I hate the guys that feel entitled to a roster spot and show up late as they feel like its owned them.

A side question and nothing to do with Iglesias, I image as soon as a player reports to camp, the team will house them and feed them (per diem)????? I image non-roster invitees are not subject to the same benefits.

I would think  that if a player is on the 40 man  or is a non roster invitee the club pays  them for housing and per diem (until they are cut then they go to the minors under minor league rules or are let go which stops the payments).

Lets see if anyone knows for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I would think  that if a player is on the 40 man  or is a non roster invitee the club pays  them for housing and per diem (until they are cut then they go to the minors under minor league rules or are let go which stops the payments).

Lets see if anyone knows for sure.

Here’s a USA Today article that explains it pretty well.    I recommend the whole article, which is very eye opening about how tough the minor leaguers have it in spring training.    But here’s the most relevant part:

MLB organizations split players into Major League and minor league camps. According to the sport’s collective bargaining agreement, only non-roster players with enough service time to be eligible for salary arbitration — “Super Two” players and above — receive the weekly expense allowances extended to rostered big-leaguers in spring training, but all players in Major League uniform for Cactus or Grapefruit League games get $95.50 in meal money for that day.

At minor-league camp — which opens in earnest this week for many clubs — players are expected to thrive on no salary, a team-provided breakfast and lunch, and a food allowance of $25 a day.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/ftw.usatoday.com/2019/03/mlb-spring-training-no-pay-minor-leaguers/amp

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • After going back and reading the draft day thread on Holliday,  I don't know if I would have the stomach to trade either one of those 3. I had the opportunity to watch Elijah Green this past week play in low A, and it reminded me of how fortunate it is to be an O's fan right now. 
    • 320M and they need a pitcher.  I think they wasted a dime somewhere.
    • But don't we need to get rid of the previous dogma - we need to spend when we're good to win?  It has nothing to do with Angelos or anything else along those lines.  If anything, my question is - knowing how good we are now, and having proven it, how can we maintain the guys that are still in the audition phase of the ascension to the bigs, without paying too high get some help now.  It's not like they're failing. I just think Elias might be thinking stop gap, not the main aisle deals.  I'm fine with that, but it seems like many just want him to give stuff away to get something big right now, and I don't think I agree with that - and I kind of hope Elias doesn't either, to be honest. Rubes will spend money, but after Angelos, it still won't be enough for some.  He doesn't need to prove he will by signing off on the trade of a top player/prospect.  I would be completely satisfied with an announcement that they had reached a long term agreement with Adley or Gunnar right now.  But I'm not waiting for Rubes to prove himself and trust that all I've seen from him so far is that he will differentiate himself from the previous ownership in a meaningful and real way - like he already has, in some ways, when his and the team's time is right.
    • It would be Basallo for me, but the upside is so massive that voting for him makes me cringe. It's pretty simple: Don't. Trade. Any. Of. Them. 
    • I think the Tigers would run to the phone to call the commissioners office if they could get Holliday for Skubal
    • I'm sure Dodger fans aren't like that.  I expect they're like Yankee fans and would like to buy/trade for all the best players.  Dodgers are actually way scarier to compete against than the Yankees they are probably the wealthiest team in the majors and run like a small market franchise in that they are trying to exploit market inefficiencies and never waste a dime.
    • I disagree with all possible votes, it is slanted. The O’s are stacked and it’s likely they add a piece or two. If this was the Dodgers, we would be hailing the off-season moves and pushing for the next big move. And the Orioles keep winning, better!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...