Jump to content

Where do Kjerstad/Westburg fit on the 2023/24 team


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Oh for crying out loud. This is still about you knowing who the GM should take better than he does? Has any part of you thought to maybe back down, or just heels completely dig in?

Every Scouting outlet had Martin ahead of Kjerstad. Every dam one! 
 

He played the overslot/underslot game. I think it was a mistake . why should I change my mind? Cause you said so? GMAFB!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So the O's traded the #2, #103 and #133 for #8, #48 and #50. 

Same thing.

You can't expect to get similar value for MLB picks that you get for NFL picks.

No .. Who did they trade with the mouse in your pocket?

They had the selections that they already had after taking Kjerstad. It’s not the same thing.
 

Trading means you have to have a willing trade partner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

No .. Who did they trade with the mouse in your pocket?

They had the selections that they already had after taking Kjerstad. It’s not the same thing.
 

Trading means you have to have a willing trade partner. 

2 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

No ... but they trade out in order to recover the lost value. 
 

In the NFL, the Ravens are the perfect example. 
They want the 10th best player and have the #2 pick. They simply slide back to 6-8 slots and get extra value. The #2 overall is worth substantially more than the #10

The Orioles traded with the same team your Ravens did in your hypothetical situation.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's balderdash.

Ballyhoo, it's only talk.

Yeah unfortunately Apple spell correct must not have balderdash in its database. 
 

I get it .... but most of the Kool Aid drinkers will be pissing all over this draft if I turn out to be right. Wait and See!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t agree with the strategy. Suggestions by posters here that Martin and Kjerstad are similarly rated is boulder dash. 
 

The Orioles went below slot in order to find the additional 2 million they overpaid for their 4th and 5th rounded. 
 

The percentages say that about two thirds of the 1st round guys will be meh at best. So it will be easy to judge if their 1st rounder was the correct one very soon. 

I like the odds that Martin will be a better MLB player than Kjerstad. 
 

Bur then we will have to wait another 3-5 season to fully grade the approach.

As I said in an older thread. I don’t buy into the Elias hype. He’s done what he’s was good at IMO. That was fixing the minor league system, bringing the scouting and development staff out of the Stone Age, and fixing the international process. 
 

I didn’t like the return for Cashner. I thought he gave away Villar. I haven’t been impressed with the 2 drafts and a monkey could’ve drafted Adley Rutschman with the 1st pick.

Martin's probably a better prospect, but he's not a stud prospect.  He's likely a second baseman with little power in an era where teams are looking more for power in their 2nd basemen.  He's not the level of prospect that Rendon and Machado were.  i would have taken Lacy over Martin.  Now, if there was a Rendon or Machado available in this draft, then yeah - they should have picked the BPA, but there wasn't, so I'm fine with what they did.          

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Yeah unfortunately Apple spell correct must not have balderdash in its database. 
 

I get it .... but most of the Kool Aid drinkers will be pissing all over this draft if I turn out to be right. Wait and See!

 

For the record I'm not at all sure about this draft.

I'm defending the strategy in general not this particular example.

I'm concerned they relied too heavily on projections based off a small sample size.

 

Also no way I was going to avoid making a KC reference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

The Orioles traded with the same team your Ravens did in your hypothetical situation.

I could go and quote the Ravens draft returns and the teams. The Ravens annually draft more players than their 7 assigned selections due to their maneuvering.

The Orioles went into this draft with with a 1st, comp rd 1st, 2nd-5th. They chose at each assigned selection. They made no trades ... None. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Martin's probably a better prospect, but he's not a stud prospect.  He's likely a second baseman with little power in an era where teams are looking more for power in their 2nd basemen.  He's not the level of prospect that Rendon and Machado were.  i would have taken Lacy over Martin.  Now, if there was a Rendon or Machado available in this draft, then yeah - they should have picked the BPA, but there wasn't, so I'm fine with what they did.          

I'm curious what Hancock's number was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

I could go and quote the Ravens draft returns and the teams. The Ravens annually draft more players than their 7 assigned selections due to their maneuvering.

The Orioles went into this draft with with a 1st, comp rd 1st, 2nd-5th. They chose at each assigned selection. They made no trades ... None. 

Right, because trades aren't allowed during the draft. 

Since that avenue wasn't open to Elias he did this instead.

You end up with a similar result.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Martin's probably a better prospect, but he's not a stud prospect.  He's likely a second baseman with little power in an era where teams are looking more for power in their 2nd basemen.  He's not the level of prospect that Rendon and Machado were.  i would have taken Lacy over Martin.  Now, if there was a Rendon or Machado available in this draft, then yeah - they should have picked the BPA, but there wasn't, so I'm fine with what they did.          

He was graded with a 70 hit tool. He’s an on base machine. He will likely hit 20-25 and a ton of doubles ... wait and see!

I would’ve taken Lacy over Kjerstad. Elias would also if weren’t about the stupid underslot approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

He was graded with a 70 hit tool. He’s an on base machine. He will likely hit 20-25 and a ton of doubles ... wait and see!

I would’ve taken Lacy over Kjerstad. Elias would also if weren’t about the stupid underslot approach. 

I can't get over how similar his college stats were to DJ Stewart.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Right, because trades aren't allowed during the draft. 

Since that avenue wasn't open to Elias he did this instead.

You end up with a similar result.

Wait and see

They sacrificed in round one to bet on low hit percentage High Schoolers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I admit I got baited by the thread title a bit and popped off before actually listening to the thing.  It doesn't really change that I've always been concerned about Cal being part of the ownership group, but I was definitely hasty to be like "SEE??". Anyway, I've got my eye on Cal. The guy just rubs me the wrong way. But hopefully nothing much to see here, or in the future. 
    • Meanwhile, I have a question about Mayo’s defense.  Everybody implies that it’s dreadful. I guess I can understand that he’s not Manny or Brooks, but how bad is it? Are we hoping he’s at least as good as George Brett, about whom someone once said,(paraphrasing), “his defense is so bad it’s like he carries his bat to the base instead of his glove.“? I love defense, and I see absolutely no reason to move Westburg away. if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. It seems far more advisable to plunk Mayo at first and do something with the guys we currently have there?  
    • I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  
    • You know, for $24 a year, a measly lousy 24 bucks a year, you can edit your comment. And you can also support @Tony-OHwho has done more work online to create an Orioles environment than literally anybody else in the entire Internet universe.
    • I think there see plenty of guys who will stay with a contending team they like if the money is close.   But Burnes clearly intends to test the market.   No significant home team discount is coming, and it just takes one team to offer something crazy to knock us out of the picture unless we’re just being stupid. 
    • When Mateo is hitting well, he really makes you wonder why he can’t do it all the time.   He looks really balanced at the plate, he uses all fields, etc.  He doesn’t look like a bad hitter who happens to be on a heater.   But that’s what his track record shows he is, until proven otherwise.  I remember that Fangraphs article last year about how Mateo had changed his approach and the improvement seemed real.  Well, no it wasn’t.  But maybe his issues are more psychological than physical?   He’s just a guy who when he slumps, quickly loses confidence and starts pressing and makes it worse?   I don’t know.    As to your point about OBP: in 2024, a .299 OBP is below average but I might not say it blows.  The MLB average is back down to .312 after a spike last year after the rule changes.  Of 312 players with 80+ PA, Mateo’s .299 ranks 191st, or 39th percentile.   Honestly, in this environment, if Mateo could stay at .299 OBP he’d be a very credible player.   But he’s a .272 career OPS guy who’d been at .267 the last two years, so I’m not expecting he’ll be able to stay at .299.   I’ll enjoy it while he’s hot though.   And he is playing a mean 2B.   Took him a couple of weeks to settle in there, but he’s looked great for the last month.    
    • I broached the experiment of Holliday in CF some months ago.  It seems to be something that could make sense.  I still expect he'll be our 2B moving forward, but having such versatility is never a bad thing.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...