Jump to content

2021 Draft Thread


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SteveA said:

11 -- college senior P
12 -- college senior P
13 -- college senior 1Bman

I think (and thought) @Can_of_corn was onto something last year when he noted the O’s didn’t spend their full pool. Maybe Cowser is getting slot and Trimble and Rhodes cost more than we think, but Faleris knows what he’s talking about and says the O’s have money to spend today. We’ll see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4th Year Seniors

We seem to have drafted a lot of them, and the assumption is that they are "cheaper" because they have fewer options (their only option is to go back to college for a 5th year, which is allowed because of Covid, then they would be in next year's draft at 23 or 24).

But of course we are concentrating on the Orioles draft and I wanted to see if we were way above average in drafting college seniors.

So I checked.   Through 13 rounds, 402 picks, there have actually been 102 guys drafted listed as 4YR SR on the MLB draft tracker.  That's 25.8%

The Orioles have taken 14 players, and 5 of them, 35.7%, are college seniors.   So we are above the norm, but I would never have guessed that 100 have gone.   College seniors clearly are a significant part of this draft cohort, and not just a way to save money on a pick, although that savings may exist.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should we expect the overslot to be the last 2-3 picks? Wouldn't it make sense to call the guys and say will you sign for X amount and then they can relay to all other teams not to draft them? The orioles can fill their roster with other guys and take the overslots later or is that not a thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SteveA said:

4th Year Seniors

We seem to have drafted a lot of them, and the assumption is that they are "cheaper" because they have fewer options (their only option is to go back to college for a 5th year, which is allowed because of Covid, then they would be in next year's draft at 23 or 24).

But of course we are concentrating on the Orioles draft and I wanted to see if we were way above average in drafting college seniors.

So I checked.   Through 13 rounds, 402 picks, there have actually been 102 guys drafted listed as 4YR SR on the MLB draft tracker.  That's 25.8%

The Orioles have taken 14 players, and 5 of them, 35.7%, are college seniors.   So we are above the norm, but I would never have guessed that 100 have gone.   College seniors clearly are a significant part of this draft cohort, and not just a way to save money on a pick, although that savings may exist.

6/16 = 37.5% now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, baltimoreO's22 said:

Should we expect the overslot to be the last 2-3 picks? Wouldn't it make sense to call the guys and say will you sign for X amount and then they can relay to all other teams not to draft them? The orioles can fill their roster with other guys and take the overslots later or is that not a thing?

Based on what I know about past drafts, that’s not really a thing. They could’ve/should’ve talked to the representatives for any overslot players they were interested in after days 1 and 2 of the draft to get the number it would take for the player to sign and then taken them, not wait to round 19.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sydnor said:

Based on what I know about past drafts, that’s not really a thing. They could’ve/should’ve talked to the representatives for any overslot players they were interested in after days 1 and 2 of the draft to get the number it would take for the player to sign and then taken them, not wait to round 19.

Well that's disappointing to hear. I was really hoping the O's would draft some overslot arms today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, baltimoreO's22 said:

Well that's disappointing to hear. I was really hoping the O's would draft some overslot arms today. 

They could surprise us. I’m only saying it’s not exactly common and I’m not expecting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, baltimoreO's22 said:

Should we expect the overslot to be the last 2-3 picks? Wouldn't it make sense to call the guys and say will you sign for X amount and then they can relay to all other teams not to draft them? The orioles can fill their roster with other guys and take the overslots later or is that not a thing?

The kids can't stop other teams from drafting them.  Or maybe the other team is willing to spend as much or more than the O's for one of these kids?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The kids can't stop other teams from drafting them.  Or maybe the other team is willing to spend as much or more than the O's for one of these kids?

Ain't nobody got the kind of money left to spend that we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...