Jump to content

Elementary, my dear Watson


Frobby

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

His low OBP is concerning even though he's showed some pop. He's also not a CFer and probably belongs in LF. 

Well, that’s not good, especially the part about him not being a CF.   That considerably raises the standard of what he needs to do offensively.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

His low OBP is concerning even though he's showed some pop. He's also not a CFer and probably belongs in LF. 

Frobby really went with the low hanging fruit for this thread title. I expect more! :)

That said, I thought the best part about Watson's scouting reports was that he profiled as a no doubt CF. Either my memory is wrong, or the expectations have not been met. Low OBP aside (which is obviously a huge issue), that really changes my perception of him as a prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Frobby really went with the low hanging fruit for this thread title. I expect more! :)

That said, I thought the best part about Watson's scouting reports was that he profiled as a no doubt CF. Either my memory is wrong, or the expectations have not been met. Low OBP aside (which is obviously a huge issue), that really changes my perception of him as a prospect.

Your memory is correct.   There were a lot of 60/70 grades slapped on his CF defense when he was drafted.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Frobby really went with the low hanging fruit for this thread title. I expect more! :)

That said, I thought the best part about Watson's scouting reports was that he profiled as a no doubt CF. Either my memory is wrong, or the expectations have not been met. Low OBP aside (which is obviously a huge issue), that really changes my perception of him as a prospect.

I just haven't seen it myself. He doesn't look like he covers all that much ground and his routes need to improve. Defense though can be the hardest to judge on minor league broadcasts because most of the time you can't see the jumps, but he looks more like Austin Hays playing center than Mullins. 

He won't kill you out there, but he looks below average range wise to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I just haven't seen it myself. He doesn't look like he covers all that much ground and his routes need to improve. Defense though can be the hardest to judge on minor league broadcasts because most of the time you can't see the jumps, but he looks more like Austin Hays playing center than Mullins. 

He won't kill you out there, but he looks below average range wise to me.

Would you say this is similar to someone like Hays? He was pegged as the CF of the future, but seeing him in person out there, he's a little more stiff than was advertised even though he does have speed. Now that we've seen him a lot in LF this year, that really feels like his true position and he's well above average out there which is a nice change for LF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hazmat said:

He has been a disappointment.  Let's hope that Trimble and Rhodes are much better.

Has he?  3rd round pick putting up respectable numbers at AA.  Now I will say that I was also under the impression that he was a plus CF, so if that is not the case that definitely takes some shine off of him.  But if Trimble and Rhodes are both "much better" than him then they'd be some pretty darn good picks.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Would you say this is similar to someone like Hays? He was pegged as the CF of the future, but seeing him in person out there, he's a little more stiff than was advertised even though he does have speed. Now that we've seen him a lot in LF this year, that really feels like his true position and he's well above average out there which is a nice change for LF. 

I always thought of Hays as more of a good corner OF who could play CF if needed.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, interloper said:

Would you say this is similar to someone like Hays? He was pegged as the CF of the future, but seeing him in person out there, he's a little more stiff than was advertised even though he does have speed. Now that we've seen him a lot in LF this year, that really feels like his true position and he's well above average out there which is a nice change for LF. 

Yes, I would say that's a good assessment from my perspective though Hays was seen as corner guy who could play CF. I liked Hays bat a lot more though. 

Watson to me just looks like he's going to be low OBP guy with some pop of a solid, but not CF type defensive outfielder with a slightly below average arm. 

This is only his first full season so I will not count him out, but at 24-years old, I think he is who he is at this point when it comes to the kind of player he's going to be. Can he improve, sure? Does having a little pop make him interesting a bit and worth seeing how it looks over the next few years, sure. But as you can see in my power rankings, he's more of a 4th outfielder type.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, glenn__davis said:

Has he?  3rd round pick putting up respectable numbers at AA.  Now I will say that I was also under the impression that he was a plus CF, so if that is not the case that definitely takes some shine off of him.  But if Trimble and Rhodes are both "much better" than him then they'd be some pretty darn good picks.

I guess I look at his OBP and don't see a likely path to a major league contributor.  If you're 24 and can just barely get above .300 OBP in High A...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If you want to see how young superstars should play, look at Churios and Merrill. Both big time contributors to their teams in the post season, both players 20 and 21 years of age. Meanwhile, our Jackson doesn’t even get an AB. Something is just off with this organization and their development..
    • I agree with some of the opening post. I cannot blame Hyde for this team not hitting. I believe it is completely analytical based. Analytics are against singles, walks, hit and run or bunts.    I know we can pick our guy to be upset with but I will go with Tony Taters. Adley hit a single to RF and with the right effort and baserunning he should have been on third base. Don’t have to talk about the terrible AB with the bases loaded. There was another play with the Massey single in the second that rubbed me the wrong way. The ball was hit 73 MPH and landed 250 feet. The RF wall is 325 feet away so how far is he playing back against Michael Massey? Tony did not strike me of a guy giving it everything he had to get to a fly ball. He basically assumed Mullins would get it and jogged in. 
    • I would have taken this loss harder in the past guess I'm getting older. Also this team has been telegraphing for over a half season how this season would end. I don't want to hear stats on how many runs this team scored it's a lineup that lives and dies by the home run. The problem is the weather cools in October and the ball doesn't carry as well in summer at OPACY. The Orioles actually got good pitching, but the offense came up small yet again. Elias needs to rethink the types of hitters he has on the Orioles roster and evaluate the effectiveness of having two hitting coaches. There's even an offensive strategy coach and what exactly does he do? "Hey Adley next time you get up the plate try not to make an out".
    • Completely agree and there's no reason the O's shouldn't be a serious player for Soto.  Him and one top starter and I'm happy.
    • Add a couple of seasoned professionals who know how to win. Solid players who have been around a while. These young guys are talented for sure, but that’s not enough. They need to learn to play better as a team and know what it takes to win consistently.  I honestly think they get caught up in reading about how good they are, not proving it on the field day after day.
    • Except Cruz wasn’t an overpay. He’s the rare older free agent that actually earned his money. By the way, Cruz was the 55th highest paid player when he signed his FA deal after he played for the Orioles. He wasn’t even that expensive.    But that’s just an aside. I understand what you’re saying and your point is valid. I’m just still irked that the Orioles basically punted in that offseason that Cruz walked. I hope they are fiscally brave enough to take the next step and not count on Holliday and Mayo to improve next years team. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...