Jump to content

2021 AFL Predictions


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

The league is making a return on 10/13 after not having a season last year. The O’s get to send 7 players. In 2019, they lifted some of the roster restrictions regarding players having to be in AA, AAA, or having been off the Injured List for so many days. 
 

Who ya got going?

I’m guessing AR, Westburg, Gunnar, Stowers, Felix Bautista(if not in MLB), and probably two organizational type pitchers.  Neustrom, Grenier, Vavra, and Yusniel Diaz should be in the mix as well. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on who is healthy at the end of the season, and needs more reps. I would not send Adley. As a catcher, and I know he has played 1B and DH’d some, but I just rest his knees and get him ready for AAA and to make his debut in July 2022. I would like to send Westburg and Henderson, but I might want to rest them this off-season. Just get them into an off-season conditioning/lifting program. 

I do like the idea of sending Terrin Vavra, Cadyn Grenier, Kyle Stowers and Hudson Haskin. Joey Ortiz would be great, but I would not think he will be ready after labrum surgery on his left shoulder. Maverick Handley might be a guy to send. Maybe Patrick Dorrian or Zach Watson. Adam Hall is another I might consider, but he might need to focus on a program to add more muscle to his frame. 

Pitchers are going to be interesting. With so many watching their innings from the COVID stoppage, hard to say yet. I would not think we send any real top 30 type prospects. Maybe Cody Sedlock, Gray Fenter and Cameron Bishop. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might make sense for Hall to go, depending on injury progression. Westburg would be a good choice, and some combo of Gunnar, Cowser, Stowers, Ortiz (injury dependent), Hall.

No real reason to send any triple-A guys unless they missed time due to injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, seak05 said:

Might make sense for Hall to go, depending on injury progression. Westburg would be a good choice, and some combo of Gunnar, Cowser, Stowers, Ortiz (injury dependent), Hall.

No real reason to send any triple-A guys unless they missed time due to injury. 

I'm pretty sure that teams make sure to send enough of a representation of players that the teams actually function as teams.  So the Orioles will have to send a certain number of pitchers and might be asked to send a catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm pretty sure that teams make sure to send enough of a representation of players that the teams actually function as teams.  So the Orioles will have to send a certain number of pitchers and might be asked to send a catcher.

Maybe send a top prospect like Diplan or is that too risky.  I mean he is a Futures star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We might face a lot of pressure to send AR, even if it’s just as a 1B/DH. He’s the #1 prospect in all the minors. West coast guy and it’s in Arizona. 
 

Stowers is sort of a must send. He’s in AA. He’s put up good numbers. He deserves to be there. 
 

Vavra fits the mold of an injured player that can make up some playing time. 
 

Those three are the “must sends” for position players. Arguments could then be made for lots of players but especially Westburg, Grenier, Cowser, Gunnar, Jones, and Neustrom. 
 

I have no idea on the pitchers.  I think it will be org guys.  I just hope that Elias let’s the bats eat down there.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm pretty sure that teams make sure to send enough of a representation of players that the teams actually function as teams.  So the Orioles will have to send a certain number of pitchers and might be asked to send a catcher.

If they're asked to send a catcher, you send Maverick or Hudgins. Generally you don't see top prospects in the AFL who have already made it to tripleA. In the past the top prospects have been guys who ended the season in double A (and single A). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the pro-Adley argument would be is Month6 of seeing live pitching beneficial.   But with the AAA extension, his 2021 will be the full 5 months of the traditional Minors season.

I do put a bit of value on batters developing the reactive skill of seeing live pitching - they can't get the lab pitch design benefits like proactive pitchers can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think we should send any AAA guys to the AFL. If you want a AAA guy to get reps, have them play Winter ball in the DR or PR. It s a higher level of comp. 

Just another thought, but Elias may be making a few deals with prospects going out. The AFL is also a chance to showcase those players, maybe 1-2, he may be willing to move. The roster decisions prior to the R5 draft are going to be interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I thought the peak was about 30? If it’s 26, that would suggest Adley is already starting his downhill.
    • I feel like this team may be a little older than the past teams. Definitely a good start for the hitters. We normally get trounced in this league.
    • You will see a good pitcher no matter what. We have the #3 pitching staff in MLB and guys are pitching well from top to bottom of the rotation. 
    • Well being honest....it is hard not to.  They were that bad.   Although for me I thought he looked just as bad in the field.   It was almost as if he had never played baseball before.  At times he could barely throw to first base. 
    • At least we now know he has pro-grade HR power. Aberdeen's a tough park to hit them out and he cleared the fence easily. Im encouraged.
    • What can we get for him in a trade? Does he even have any trade value remaining?
    • To put things into context, Jackson has so far an .898 OPS at AAA in his age 20 season (he started the season at over 1.000 before his call-up, I don't think it's a stretch to suggest that going up and struggling might've had some effect on his numbers afterwards).  Mayo at age 20 had a .782 OPS between A+ and AA. Basallo will turn 20 in 60 days. He's about 2/3 of a year younger than Holliday. In his age 19 season he currently has an .810 OPS in AA. In Jackson's age 19 season he had a .928 OPS at Bowie before moving on to AAA where he OPS'd .796 in 91 PA.  Unless there is important statistic evidence suggesting that ISO at the minor league level is a more important indicator of future success than say wRC+ or OPS (and if this were true, we should be encouraged by the fact that Jackson has gone from a .176 ISO--.133 at the same level--to .196 ISO from age 19 to 20) I don't really see any argument for putting Basallo or Mayo above them. With all due respect--because I think you are putting forth some interesting points and almost convinced me before I did this little exercise--I think you are likely subconsciously being affected too strongly by Jackson's 36 PA at the ML level. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...