Jump to content

Pie for Christmas?


Jdan14

Recommended Posts

I do not know why everyone is so pumped to trade for Pie. I think we just want something to happen. Pie may be good, but he has been bad. Scott can play leftfield for us and doesn't make a whole lot. We need pitching. Dealing a guy like Olson for another outfielder makes little sense. We have Markakis, Jones, Scott, Montanez, and Reimold. We will only carry 4 of them. Reimold is a good prospect, put him in left before you trade Olson to the Cubs for a 4th outfielder.

The Cubs no longer have the parts to trade for Roberts unless Vitters is in the deal. I would consider the following deal (Pie, Marshall, Vitters), but the Cubs would not. Last year we could have landed Ceda, Cedeno, Marshall, and a player like Eric Patterson or Rich Hill for Roberts.

EVERYONE should always be in favor of adding high ceiling, cheap young talent that has fallen out of favor and isn't going to cost much to acquire...Those are always the guys you should go after...Look at some of these guys over the years and how we could have had them for very little? Quentin, Phillips, Hamilton, Milledge, etc.....Names we have talked about over and over on this board...guys the Orioles either chose to not go after or didn't give up what it took to get them...and now look at them?

You always go after talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Can we quit with the Pie threads already....There are plenty of threads about the Cubs & Pie.

Pie is a scrap heap guy now. The Orioles are better off keeping Reimold & Montanez if they deal Scott. If they keep Scott there is definately no room. Especially if you count Freel.

Guy K's way too much ...Hits for too little power for LF & his SB/CS ratios are awful. Great to be enamored for his defense. But do we really want a Stone clone playing for us again???

How many times do you need to have the similarities between Felix Pie and Adam Jones illustrated for you? The reason I ask is because I think we're into double digits already.

Actually a review of the differences would be much more expedient:

* Jones projects for a bit more power

* Jones has gotten legit chance to play everyday at the ML level

In every other meaningful way, the two guys are very similar: strengths, weaknesses, ceiling, etc. All of it is very comparable. You'd have to be a fool if you wouldn't welcome another young Adam Jones-caliber talent onto the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many times do you need to have the similarities between Felix Pie and Adam Jones illustrated for you? The reason I ask is because I think we're into double digits already.

Actually a review of the differences would be much more expedient:

* Jones projects for a bit more power

* Jones has gotten legit chance to play everyday at the ML level

In every other meaningful way, the two guys are very similar: strengths, weaknesses, ceiling, etc. All of it is very comparable. You'd have to be a fool if you wouldn't welcome another young Adam Jones-caliber talent onto the O's.

Dave, give it up...Everyone should be able to acknowledge that Pie is a high risk/high reward guy. He may be a bust but that doesn't mean a team like the Orioles shouldn't be trying for him.

Dave...what do you think the Cubs would want for Pie? Do you think they would only deal him for something to help them win now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave, give it up...Everyone should be able to acknowledge that Pie is a high risk/high reward guy. He may be a bust but that doesn't mean a team like the Orioles shouldn't be trying for him.

Dave...what do you think the Cubs would want for Pie? Do you think they would only deal him for something to help them win now?

I think they'd be open to a lot of different ideas, including prospects.

Frankly they've already got one too many position players on the roster as it is, and the situation gets worse if/when another OF is added. Assuming Bradley signs, and they carry a 7-man bullpen, they'll have 5 bench spots to divide amongst:

Fontenot

Cedeno

Johnson

Hoffpaiur

Pie

Gathright

backup Catcher

Given that, they might even prefer a non-roster guy or two, actually. Although perhaps more likely would be to put a package together with some of the usual suspects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they'd be open to a lot of different ideas, including prospects.

Frankly they've already got one too many position players on the roster as it is, and the situation gets worse if/when another OF is added. Assuming Bradley signs, and they carry a 7-man bullpen, they'll have 5 bench spots to divide amongst:

Fontenot

Cedeno

Johnson

Hoffpaiur

Pie

Gathright

backup Catcher

Given that, they might even prefer a non-roster guy or two, actually. Although perhaps more likely would be to put a package together with some of the usual suspects.

Do they need a bullpen guy? Would a guy like Sherrill have interest for them, for example?

And if we take on Marquis and the full 9.875 million(taking it all on to get Pie), can they be had for way less?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see where Huff, Scott, Sherril and Brob fit into this teams future. We are building for a bright future and taking a chance on a talent like Pie isn't a bad idea. I would rather Reimold just work out and plug him into LF but as we've seen in other young players who have come through Baltimore it doesn't work out that way. If giving them Scott for Pie and company is a deal they would make why not. What do we have to lose? Scott? A player not in our future? It isn't going to block Reimold. Chances are kakes is gone soon anyways so why not add another OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EVERYONE should always be in favor of adding high ceiling, cheap young talent that has fallen out of favor and isn't going to cost much to acquire...Those are always the guys you should go after...Look at some of these guys over the years and how we could have had them for very little? Quentin, Phillips, Hamilton, Milledge, etc.....Names we have talked about over and over on this board...guys the Orioles either chose to not go after or didn't give up what it took to get them...and now look at them?

You always go after talent.

Isn't Olson one of those guys? We are trading for a strenght by giving up a weakness. I would be more open to the deal if we were to sign 2 or 3 starters, but we have not done that as of yet. Hamilton only fell out of favor due to the drugs, that guy was always the real deal. We could have added Carlos Pena by extending an invite to camp a few years back. If we get Pie where does he play? Is he out of options? If you asked 50 baseball experts if they would take Pie or Reimold how do you think they would answer. The deal doesn't make sense based on the current makeup of this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott-30

Roberts-31

Huff-32

Sherril-31

Walker-37

None of them are a part of our future so why hold on to them. Why not trade Walker for Pie when the Cubs need a bullpen guy.

I think Scott could be excluded from this discussion since he's cheap, under control, and productive. For the right price, of course you trade him but he's more valuable than the rest going forward. Of course, you could argue that this makes him more tradeable. But if Tex is signed it will become more important to find players like Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roberts doesn't have the value you think he does if you really believe the Cubs don't have the parts without Vitters.

He's only signed for one year and, as is being discussed in another thread, Hudson is a slightly inferior option that can be had without surrendering any talent.

It's doubtful anyone is going to pony up a big bounty including upper-tier prospects for Roberts. That ship has sailed (if it ever was in port in the first place).

Regardless of all that, he's simply not a fit for CHC any longer. Their $$$s are going to be spent elsewhere this year.

The Cubs should spend those dollars in other places. The Cubs farm system is not very strong at this point. They dealt Ceda to the Marlins and he is listed as the Marlins 10th best prospect according to BA. The only guys I hear anything about are Samardzija and Vitters. I think the Indians or White Sox would be a good fit. I would try to land Brandon Allen and Getz for Roberts. I would be very happy with a young 1B and 2B prospect in return for Roberts. According to BA they are the #6 and #9 prospects in the White Sox farm system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many times do you need to have the similarities between Felix Pie and Adam Jones illustrated for you? The reason I ask is because I think we're into double digits already.

Actually a review of the differences would be much more expedient:

* Jones projects for a bit more power

* Jones has gotten legit chance to play everyday at the ML level

In every other meaningful way, the two guys are very similar: strengths, weaknesses, ceiling, etc. All of it is very comparable. You'd have to be a fool if you wouldn't welcome another young Adam Jones-caliber talent onto the O's.

Then I guess the Cubs are fools according to your definition when they sign Joey Gathright and want to trade your Adam Jones-caliber talent Pie.

Or, is it more like Aaron Fitt said yesterday in his chat:

Quote:

Rick Oakland CA: Felix Pie is out of options and not in the Cubs' plans. I'm sure he can be good fielding CF in the majors and his hitting might surprise. Should some non-contender pick him up and give him two months to show what he can do given consistent ABs?

SportsNation Aaron Fitt: I think Pie could have a bounce like Corey Patterson had when he first went to Baltimore, but I see him having a Patterson-like fizzle in the long term.

I know your retort is that Pie hasn't been given a real shot (may be true), but, then, it is pretty foolish for the Cubs to not give him a shot if he truly is more Adam Jones than Corey Patterson. My feeling is that he is really more Patterson than Jones and I haven't seen a good trade outside of the Trachsel one with the Cubs and even that one hasn't yet given us any major league players (granted, Moore still has a somewhat of a shot). I would like to see the O's go for Hermida over Pie. Or try to add Baldelli.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roberts doesn't have the value you think he does if you really believe the Cubs don't have the parts without Vitters.

He's only signed for one year and, as is being discussed in another thread, Hudson is a slightly inferior option that can be had without surrendering any talent.

It's doubtful anyone is going to pony up a big bounty including upper-tier prospects for Roberts. That ship has sailed (if it ever was in port in the first place).

Regardless of all that, he's simply not a fit for CHC any longer. Their $$$s are going to be spent elsewhere this year.

The the Cubs should get hudson instead! A good idea since other than Vitters the Cubs have little talent.

Also Pie has little value now as everyone knows the Cubs will move him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I guess the Cubs are fools according to your definition when they sign Joey Gathright and want to trade your Adam Jones-caliber talent Pie.

Or, is it more like Aaron Fitt said yesterday in his chat:

Quote:

Rick Oakland CA: Felix Pie is out of options and not in the Cubs' plans. I'm sure he can be good fielding CF in the majors and his hitting might surprise. Should some non-contender pick him up and give him two months to show what he can do given consistent ABs?

SportsNation Aaron Fitt: I think Pie could have a bounce like Corey Patterson had when he first went to Baltimore, but I see him having a Patterson-like fizzle in the long term.

I know your retort is that Pie hasn't been given a real shot (may be true), but, then, it is pretty foolish for the Cubs to not give him a shot if he truly is more Adam Jones than Corey Patterson. My feeling is that he is really more Patterson than Jones and I haven't seen a good trade outside of the Trachsel one with the Cubs and even that one hasn't yet given us any major league players (granted, Moore still has a somewhat of a shot). I would like to see the O's go for Hermida over Pie. Or try to add Baldelli.

You never know until you try. I would be willing to bet that Dave is upset that the Cubs won't give Pie a chance. At the same time he can see that they won't give him a chance and is saying that he is a good buy low opportunity for a team like the O's.

Personally, if the O's could get Pie, Marquis and Hill (another buy low) for Scott it would be a great deal. Marquis would be a good 3-5 range SP for a year and Pie and Hill are cheap options for a few years. Scott isn't so good we shouldn't look to upgrade. If Pie fails we can still use Reimold in LF. I hardly think one persons opinion should make the decision for you. MacPhail seems to like him, so I'd take his opinion over Aaron Fitt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
    • Gunnar’s base running is in the 99th percentile.  That mess is in the 98th percentile.
    • Yeah, the highlighted section here is really why I agree that the O's will look to minimize losing players to waivers just yet. Things could blow up on them pretty quick. There's a ton of risk with these moves, but they have to find out. The best way to do that is to utilize the options for Akin and Tate, IMO. We'll see! 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...