Jump to content

MLB.com on Rutschman: read this and drool!


Frobby

Recommended Posts

This portion of the article stood out to me:

Quote

The .295 BA: Rutschman's bat-to-ball skills are driving his average. His swing-and-miss rate since June 10 is under 16%, ranking in the top 10% of the league over that time. When Rutschman swings at strikes, he connects 89% of the time, putting him among the top 15% of hitters in in-zone contact rate.

cgl8me8meyne7g2qdgdq.jpg

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Kind of stinks to have a catcher who can frame like that when they’re about to go to an electronic k zone. Might mean his peak value will be next year.

Doesn’t sound like MLB is going to an electronic zone anytime soon.  The players hated it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's now extremely noticeable when Chirinos simply gives up on borderline pitches. He'll catch them and just immediately move the glove away from the zone to throw the ball back to the pitcher. 

Adley has been a joy to watch, and his throwing is starting to come around which was my only concern early on. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

Those eye-popping offensive metrics really underscore why a reunion with Trey in free agency is so undesirable despite how much we all love the guy- if Adley isn't catching on a particular day, he needs the DH spot open to keep his bat in the lineup.

 

Adley alone isn’t a reason to not sign Trey or any other mostly DH player. Adley should probably get one full day off per week and the regular DH couldn’t sit the other one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, survivedc said:

Adley alone isn’t a reason to not sign Trey or any other mostly DH player. Adley should probably get one full day off per week and the regular DH couldn’t sit the other one?

There may be streches, especially during the balmy mid-Atlantic July and August, where we want Adley to DH a bit more to keep him fresh for the stretch run, or where he might be a bit too banged up to handle the rigors of catching 9 innings but still in good enough shape to hit. Not having a well-paid everyday DH to relegate to bench duty would be beneficial at those times.

And of course other guys would benefit from that flexibility as well.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...