Jump to content

Jackson Holliday 2023


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Hallas said:

 

The other thing is that there wasn't the level of hype around this pick as there was with other fast movers.  The fast movers out of the draft that come to mind are Griffey, ARod, Machado, and Harper.  But all these guys had a ton of hype around them.  The Machado/Harper draft was seen as one of the best at the top end in years.  And Griffey and ARod were all hyped up as future HOFers before they even stepped on a major league diamond.  People were debating whether we even made the right pick with Holliday.  (spoiler alert: we did)

I wouldn’t mention Manny in the same breath as the other three, in terms of pre-draft hype.  Harper was a very clear no. 1 over Manny.   

Before Holliday, there have been 22 position players drafted 1:1 out of high school.  (For this purpose, I’m counting Bryce Harper, who was HS age but went to Juco early to enhance his draft status.). The only ones to make it to the majors in two years or less were (in reverse chronological order):

Bryce Harper (2 years)

Justin Upton (2)

Alex Rodriguez (1, for a cup of coffee, and again in August of year 2)

Ken Griffey, Jr. (2)

Mike Ivie (1, for a cup of coffee, wasn’t up again until 4 years after he was drafted)

Jeff Burroughs (1, for a cup of coffee, called up for good in July of year 2).

Tim Foli (2)

Harper (139 games), Upton (43), Rodriguez (48). Griffey (127) and Burroughs (59) got a lot of playing time in the second year after they were drafted.  

Of the other 15 players drafted 1:1 out of high school, 8 made it to the majors in 3 years, 3 made it in 4 years, and 4 took longer than 4 years.   

 

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Holliday get the 70 hit tool at some point?

Holliday was considered a 60 before the draft. As a point of reference, the only 70 hit tools players I'm aware of are: Sal Frelick when he came out of Boston College in 2021, Temarr Johnson out of high school in 2022, and Dylan Crews in this year's draft out of LSU. Frelick hit ~.360 at BC the year he came out and has hit ~.325 in all levels through AAA.

Holliday set the all-time, national hits record as a senior in high school while batting ~.700. Then he hit ~.300 across two levels in 2022 and ~.400 across two levels so far this season; ~.360 overall. High BB% and low K%. Seems to pass the eye test too in terms of his swing.

Not sure what else you would be looking for as far as the hit tool goes.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Alasdaire said:

Does Holliday get the 70 hit tool at some point?

Holliday was considered a 60 before the draft. As a point of reference, the only 70 hit tools players I'm aware of are: Sal Frelick when he came out of Boston College in 2021, Temarr Johnson out of high school in 2022, and Dylan Crews in this year's draft out of LSU. Frelick hit ~.360 at BC the year he came out and has hit ~.325 in all levels through AAA.

Holliday set the all-time, national hits record as a senior in high school while batting ~.700. Then he hit ~.300 across two levels in 2022 and ~.400 across two levels so far this season; ~.360 overall. High BB% and low K%. Seems to pass the eye test too in terms of his swing.

Not sure what else you would be looking for as far as the hit tool goes.

When prospect sites do their complete revamp post draft… I think we’ll see Holliday #1 overall a lot, and we’ll see some higher tool values. 
 

It’s crazy to think that there was a debate with Drew Jones. It’s also crazy to think that we’ll have three straight seasons of having three different #1 prospects in all of baseball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s crazy to think that there was a debate with Drew Jones. It’s also crazy to think that we’ll have three straight seasons of having three different #1 prospects in all of baseball. 

The craziest part of that is Druw Jones was said to have a better hit tool than Holliday! In retrospect, the national hits record that Holliday set as a senior should have tipped off scouts that his bat is special. It's difficult to take high school stat lines too seriously, but 90 hits in 130 at bats is undeniable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alasdaire said:

The craziest part of that is Druw Jones was said to have a better hit tool than Holliday! In retrospect, the national hits record that Holliday set as a senior should have tipped off scouts that his bat is special. It's difficult to take high school stat lines too seriously, but 90 hits in 130 at bats is undeniable.

I don’t think that is accurate.  The biggest question about Druw Jones was his hit tool but by last spring most “experts” were buying in.  Keith Law said, paraphrasing, Druw Jones is the clear #1 UNLESS “we are all wrong about his hit tool”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I don’t think that is accurate.  The biggest question about Druw Jones was his hit tool but by last spring most “experts” were buying in.  Keith Law said, paraphrasing, Druw Jones is the clear #1 UNLESS “we are all wrong about his hit tool”.

What's not accurate? I'm saying that most evaluators thought Druw Jones had a better hit tool than Holliday. Jones' production was still very good in high school, and the athleticism/baseball IQ were projected well as a hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Alasdaire said:

What's not accurate? I'm saying that most evaluators thought Druw Jones had a better hit tool than Holliday. Jones' production was still very good in high school, and the athleticism/baseball IQ were projected well as a hitter.

Baseball America did rate the best 5 hit tools and Termarr was #1, Jones #2 and Holliday #4, but I believe both had a rating of 60 on the hit tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Baseball America did rate the best 5 hit tools and Termarr was #1, Jones #2 and Holliday #4, but I believe both had a rating of 60 on the hit tool.

Sure, I suppose you could say that Druw Jones was considered to have as good of a hit tool as Holliday even if not necessarily better.

Jones is just the prototypical five-tool player that scouts dream about. Wonder whether the O's saw through that and questioned Jones' ability to get on or if they just thought very highly of Holliday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously Jackson looks like the best choice for Elias right now.  Makes Elias and his team look extremely savy.  I think if the kid can hit AA pitching this summer and fall you have to actually kind of wonder if he might make his pro debut in 24.  Really its all up to him.  If he hits like this there is no stopping him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gurgi said:

Obviously Jackson looks like the best choice for Elias right now.  Makes Elias and his team look extremely savy.  I think if the kid can hit AA pitching this summer and fall you have to actually kind of wonder if he might make his pro debut in 24.  Really its all up to him.  If he hits like this there is no stopping him. 

It's literally not all up to him and there is something that can stop him.

I'm not saying he won't, the window is clearly open at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • To be clear, he sucked for three weeks.  It was hard to watch, but some people have just way overreacted.  He’ll be fine.   
    • No buzzkill here. Go ahead and feel however you feel. But I don’t fear the Yankees. We are the better team and have many more assets in our Minor League system. The Yankees have some good young pitching but only 2 top 100 prospects (both position players, outfielders). They are a good team, but are in no way in a better position both now or in the immediate future. And we already saw what happened when the 2 teams played.
    • What he’s doing is elite.  His big moment pedigree will be shutting us down in the playoffs when the Dodgers or Yankees give up the farm for him. He dominated the Yankees for a save in Yankee stadium.  Good enough for me.
    • Mason Miller was #48 on Baseball America’s top 100 going into last year as a starter.  So, just because you don’t know anything about him doesn’t mean he was some unknown.   As a reliever, Miller is dominating as well as any reliever in the history of the game.  Sure, SSS alert, but the whole baseball world is fawning.   Why not?
    • Anyway, in the Athletic yesterday, there was an article about the ROY front runners in the AL.  Mason Miller was #1, Cowser was #2.  The article made note of how guys like Holliday, Langford, Carter and others who were pre-season favorites have not lived up to the hype and/or have been injured.  A few things here: First, just because it was on the MLB Network doesn't mean it's real.  That's people getting paid to...well, just talk.  Do we even know that the Athletics would listen to trades for Mason Miller? Second, the Athletics aren't that bad this year, so far.  They're 3 games under .500 in a division where the Angels are always going to crap the bed, the Astros look like they're finally cooked and the Rangers and Mariners are solid but not world beaters.   I think a lot of us don't have much of a frame of reference outside of competing in the AL East.  I believe that if you're in a different division than the one where two teams can have sky-high payrolls and one team is consistently in the running for the leanest, most well run team in the game, you probably look at things a little differently in terms of winning your division.  The path the Athletics have to take to get to winning their division isn't as hard as what you have to do in the East in regard to the competition.  Like, the Mariners weren't about to add Soto. They don't have to nail their rebuild like we had to in order to compete in that division.  And I'm not sure where they are in their rebuild, but I think it's safe to say that they're not at the ground floor and Miller looks to be a big part of them being respectable. Third, if you believe that Mason Miller is the front runner in the AL for ROY (at least he's in the top 3, I think that's safe to say) I can't remember the last time a team traded a ROY frontrunner at any part of the season.  Not to say it can't happen, but it's unlikely that it will. All of that is to say that I don't think the Athletics would be shopping him.  They'll take some calls because it's polite to pick up the phone, but when you've got a guy like that and you're on the upswing in your rebuild, you're probably not going to trade him. Let's leave Basallo, Mayo and whoever else alone and move on.  
    • So six weeks makes you an elite closer?  How’s that UCL doing of his?  Has the league seen him 2-3 times yet?  What’s his big moment pedigree?  It’s easy pitching for a team with Oakland’s expectations versus us in the AL East. That team is homeless and expected to lose 100. You can’t get lower than that. I guess contraction level expectations. 
    • As usual, I’m not worried about our competitors at this stage of the season.  Just win a lot of games and put yourself in a good position, and then see where things stand as the trade deadline approaches.   The Yankees will have their ups and downs, and so will we.     In my mind, the first goal is to get to 18 games over .500.  That puts a team in position to win 90 games just by playing .500 ball the rest of the season, and 90 wins is a virtual lock to make the playoffs.   Then get greedy from there.       
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...