Jump to content

Umpire Scorecard Thread


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

I honestly thought that was going to be worse for us

I can only guess that the strike zone shown on the TV screen is too stingy, because I would have said that Yankee pitchers had 15 strike calls that were outside the box.  This says there were only 6 called strikes for both teams combined that were actually balls.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenn__davis said:

I missed the non-overturn on the Mateo play.  How egregious was it?  Obviously that's not on the umps at the park but I sure don't seem to understand a lot of the replay reversals and non-reversals.

I don't think it was quite as egregious as the broadcast made it seem, honestly. There's a possibility the runner's heel spikes were on the bag at the same time as Mateo, and therefore not enough to overturn. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, glenn__davis said:

I missed the non-overturn on the Mateo play.  How egregious was it?  Obviously that's not on the umps at the park but I sure don't seem to understand a lot of the replay reversals and non-reversals.

It was awful.  It was clear on replay that he was safe.  Hard to fathom what they were looking at in the replay office.  I'm sure they're looking for anyway to not overturn the calls to help out their brothers in blue.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hazmat said:

It was awful.  It was clear on replay that he was safe.  Hard to fathom what they were looking at in the replay office.  I'm sure they're looking for anyway to not overturn the calls to help out their brothers in blue.

I agree.  I didn't think there was any way he wouldn't be called safe. This wasn't like basketball when there are multiple fingertips touching a ball on its way out of bounds.  This seemed very clear to me. I was honestly shocked they didn't overturn it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think was taking some of his frustrations out from that awful None overturn on the Mateo play that cost them their challenge. They then couldn't use it on the Hays strike to 2B when it appeared they may have gotten the runner. 

I was surprised by how accurate Moore was based on the box last night. I'm thinking the box on MASN may have been off a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I think was taking some of his frustrations out from that awful None overturn on the Mateo play that cost them their challenge. They then couldn't use it on the Hays strike to 2B when it appeared they may have gotten the runner. 

I was surprised by how accurate Moore was based on the box last night. I'm thinking the box on MASN may have been off a bit. 

Agree completely.  If that play is overturned, which it should've been, they could've challenged the other one.  Since we didn't have a challenge MASN didn't show many replays but it looked clear that Mateo tagged the front foot before the back foot, so he should've been out too.

That one pitch way on the outside was definitely the one Adley caught.  I mentioned it in the Game thread.  Was a bad call that went our way but I guess it wasn't in a situation that it really registered much (I think the guy grounded out on the next pitch).

Edited by Mooreisbetter27
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Agree completely.  If that play is overtturned which it should've been, they could've challenged the other one.  Since we didn't have a challenge MASN didn't show many replays but it looked clear that Mateo tagged the front foot before the back foot, so he should've been out too.

That one pitch way on the outside was definitely the one Adley caught.  I mentioned it in the Game thread.  Was a bad call that went our way but I guess it wasn't in a situation that it really registered much (I think the guy grounded out on the next pitch).

Yeah, I wondered why MASN didn't show more replay on the play at second. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 
    • I can't say The Wall gives me all warm fuzzies but it doesn't swing at pitches a foot outside the zone or take a meatball right down the middle of the plate. It doesn't fail to move a runner over or lay down a decent sacrifice bunt. I've never seen it fail to get a hit with a runner in scoring position. At some point The Wall will probably be modified some but you build your team to play best in their home ball park. It's called home field advantage. IMO, Westy is the best right handed bat we have right now for this park. We need someone else like Westy that plays outfield. Bregman would be nice but I don't see it because of Westy and I have hopes Holliday becomes the OBP lead off hitter we need. Note - I'm still pissed but it's getting better. I think I'll live for another season.
    • I’d like to see a study showing that team spending is more closely correlated to owner net worth than team revenue.  There are rare instances where a team owner will subsidize spending (e.g., Cohen) but that’s the exception not the rule - and note that Cohen owns 97% of the Mets vs a much lower % for Rubinstein.  Rubinstein has already been explicit that he is not in this to lose money. 
    • Cowser’s  swing decisions are determined before the pitch is even thrown. And I’ve been saying this all year, and I even said this at the game. I go it’s too early to pinch it for him because his defense is too good but he is 100% going to strike out and that’s exactly what he did with bases loaded. He decides whether he is going to swing a pitch before even thrown This is why he swings at a pitch thrown pretty close to his face . And To be fair, he  had a pretty good season doing that but obviously can be  easily exploited
    • Cowser's progress was one of the more encouraging elements this season, especially on the defensive side. I was already crediting him with being Some Kind of Good major leaguer a post back. Between his and Adley's standout bad performances on the HBP and 2-0 count, I give Cowser more of a grace.     Sure he had predetermined intent to swing, but I think the follow through was some raw instinct as hand bones fractured. Adley not swinging was the lowlight how incapacitated he was.    I believe he commands the strike zone, but to feel so low you can't pull the trigger in that spot...sheesh.
    • I believe Elias plans to bring in two more SP's, the quality isnt what im sure about. But no question he'll want to replace Burnes. Which is why I didnt comment in this thread yet because Povich might not have a spot open at the beginning of the year. 
    • So a “Pollyanna” then like me, @wildcard and others (joking of course) 😇 I’m in your camp but really wonder if Elias/Hyde and Co. can truly“flip the script” as @Just Regular alludes.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...