Jump to content

I am officially in the McKenna got to go camp


banks703

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

It still comes back to the original question, who replaces Ryan as a backup CF?

 

 

McKenna has a career WAR of -0.1 over 200 games.  He can be replaced by any number of free agents or available minor leaguers with a similar skill set. Off the Tides’ roster, maybe Daz Cameron.  On the current roster they can use Hays or Mateo (2021 Mateo played 126 innings in the OF with 67 innings in CF).  They can also acquire someone from outside the organization.  For example, somebody like Brett Phillips, who can’t hit but is a plus defender at all 3 OF positions, with a very good arm, and is a plus base runner should be available (currently w/ Angels, 5 games and 1 plate appearance).  Another guy is Magneuris Sierra, who has elite speed and defensive ability, but likewise is offensively challenged.  Sierra is currently with the Braves’ AAA affiliate.  Basically, there quite a few guys who are fast and can play really good defense, but are not major league quality hitters.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McKenna is not a good baseball player. He's replacement level at best. He needs to be DFA'd, and Westburg promoted immediately to take his roster spot. 

McKenna's dropped ball in Boston and tonight's lazy catch allowing the runner to tag were extremely unprofessional, and mind-blowing for a player who's primary value is defensive, and who's clearly one of the very last players on the MLB roster. He should have been DFA'd after the April Fool's debacle.

PROMOTE WESTBURG. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

McKenna is not a baseball player. He's replacement level at best. He needs to be DFA'd, and Westburg promoted immediately to take his roster spot. 

McKenna's dropped ball in Boston and tonight's lazy catch allowing the runner to tag were extremely unprofessional, and mind-blowing for a player who's primary value is defensive, and who's clearly one of the very last players on the MLB roster. He should have been DFA'd after the April Fool's debacle.

PROMOTE WESTBURG. 

Have to agree. I liked McKenna and hoped his mishap in Boston was a one off thing, but apparently it wasnt.

His head just isnt in the game enough for a defensive role player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McKenna is not an MLB player.  He’s below replacement level & a career .589 OPS.  He makes mental and physicals errors in the field.  On top of that the karate kid headband thing is just brutal.  How he made the team and Franchy didn’t is beyond me.  I’m dumbfounded how he still has a job.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

McKenna is not an MLB player.  He’s below replacement level & a career .589 OPS.  He makes mental and physicals errors in the field.  On top of that the karate kid headband thing is just brutal.  How he made the team and Franchy didn’t is beyond me.  I’m dumbfounded how he still has a job.  

There has to be someone that can replace him that can cover CF on an as needed basis in the MiL's. 

 

I know Daz hasn't really hit but if his defense is good then bring him up. If I recall correctly he has speed so it's not like he couldn't step into a 4th outfielder role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been skeptical about Austin Hays in CF for the last couple years, but in the small sample size, his sprint speed has improved to 71 percentile, up from 61 last year. The OAA number is awful though.

If Hays can't fill in, and considering Cameron is putting up poor numbers in AAA, then McKenna is as good as we've got. But I'd like to see him in a reduced role and not put in the lineup vs most lefties like a platoon role. Mullins has actually done okay vs lefties so far this year, and he should be given more of a shot.

Both of McKenna's big miscues this year were in games he started, and I actually wonder if he may be able to stay more focused in shorter stints as a late-inning defensive replacement as opposed to being out there all game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McKenna is not the biggest problem the O's have.

Cameron in not on the 40 man roster.  I would not use a 40 man roster spot to swap McKenna for Cameron.  Its not an improvement. And Haskins has not spent enough time at AAA to prove he is ready.

I expect a starter to be sent down later today and Krehbiel called up.   Kremer is the leading candidate to go to Norfolk.   But lets see how Irvin does today.

I could also see them calling up O'Hearn for the road trip.   Vavra  or  Bemboom are vulnerable to be sent down.   O'Hearn is not on the 40 man.  Bemboom could be DFA'd or  Johnson would need to go on the 60 day IL to make room.    However the O'Hearn move is contingent  on the willingness to play him.   No use to call him up with a hot bat and have him sit.   Vavra  and Bemboom can sit without a move.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, e16bball said:

This thread really makes clear why it’s impossible to win as a GM. 

The first guy says cut McKenna, go with Daz Cameron. But Daz isn’t any good. He’s been below-average as a hitter and fielder in the bigs, with the latter being a major problem in terms of taking over the McKenna role. He’s currently hitting .067 so far at Norfolk, so it’s not like he’s even seeing the ball well at present. It’s different just for the sake of different. 

The second guy says cut McKenna, go with someone like Brett Phillips. This board lost its mind when they traded for Phillips last year, and would presumably do so again, given that he was predictably bad in his short stint with the O’s. He also can’t hit lefties a lick, which makes him a bit pointless as a backup for Mullins. Also made an interesting suggestion in Magneuris Sierra, who is basically the same player as McKenna, just left-handed. And not currently in the organization.

The third guy says cut McKenna, go with Jordan Westburg already. Hard to figure that one, other than it would resolve two emotionally vexing issues of the moment. Not sure how adding Westburg addresses the hole the move would create, but I guess if the goal is to have the best 26 on the roster — and at-bats/playing time for all of them be damned — that would get the job done. 

At the end of it, everyone agrees that McKenna blows and should be replaced instantly. But the suggestions — except for Westburg, which again seems to create more problems than it solves — all involve other guys who, well, also blow. It’s replacing McKenna just for the sake of getting rid of McKenna, and each suggestion would probably get pilloried by the others who had a different idea.

 

Maybe they should dump McKenna, just to make a point about focus and fundamentals. It’s just a bottom-of-the-roster guy, not like it will really hurt much. But I don’t think they will. Making roster moves because of momentary frustration just doesn’t seem like this FO’s MO. They’re looking at McKenna as a guy who has consistently been an above-average defender at all 3 OF spots, who was worth damn near 1 full fWAR in 175 PAs, and who has never chafed at his limited role on this team. They’re not going to cut him loose unless there’s an actual upgrade to be found.

I don’t agree he blows and I don’t feel the need for him to be off the team.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

McKenna is not the biggest problem the O's have.

Cameron in not on the 40 man roster.  I would not use a 40 man roster spot to swap McKenna for Cameron.  Its not an improvement. And Haskins has not spent enough time at AAA to prove he is ready.

I expect a starter to be sent down later today and Krehbiel called up.   Kremer is the leading candidate to go to Norfolk.   But lets see how Irvin does today.

I could also see them calling up O'Hearn for the road trip.   Vavra  or  Bemboom are vulnerable to be sent down.   O'Hearn is not on the 40 man.  Bemboom could be DFA'd or  Johnson would need to go on the 60 day IL to make room.    However the O'Hearn move is contingent  on the willingness to play him.   No use to call him up with a hot bat and have him sit.   Vavra  and Bemboom can sit without a move.

Hyde said Bemboom was.on the roster only because we are facing the four lefties. I do expect O'Hearn as soon as there is a chance we can use him.

I agree McKenna is probably the best option but I'd like to see as little him as possible, offensively and defensively. Haskin is getting more interesting by the day. I would love some reports on his defense because he would be a natural platoon option for Mullins if he can play center.

I agree, Watkins or Krehbiel make sense. But who goes? DFA Voth or option Kremer? They said Grayson would start again. Could also option Gillespie or Baumann. Maybe Baumann who just pitched 2 last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, e16bball said:

This thread really makes clear why it’s impossible to win as a GM. 

The first guy says cut McKenna, go with Daz Cameron. But Daz isn’t any good. He’s been below-average as a hitter and fielder in the bigs, with the latter being a major problem in terms of taking over the McKenna role. He’s currently hitting .067 so far at Norfolk, so it’s not like he’s even seeing the ball well at present. It’s different just for the sake of different. 

The second guy says cut McKenna, go with someone like Brett Phillips. This board lost its mind when they traded for Phillips last year, and would presumably do so again, given that he was predictably bad in his short stint with the O’s. He also can’t hit lefties a lick, which makes him a bit pointless as a backup for Mullins. Also made an interesting suggestion in Magneuris Sierra, who is basically the same player as McKenna, just left-handed. And not currently in the organization.

The third guy says cut McKenna, go with Jordan Westburg already. Hard to figure that one, other than it would resolve two emotionally vexing issues of the moment. Not sure how adding Westburg addresses the hole the move would create, but I guess if the goal is to have the best 26 on the roster — and at-bats/playing time for all of them be damned — that would get the job done. 

At the end of it, everyone agrees that McKenna blows and should be replaced instantly. But the suggestions — except for Westburg, which again seems to create more problems than it solves — all involve other guys who, well, also blow. It’s replacing McKenna just for the sake of getting rid of McKenna, and each suggestion would probably get pilloried by the others who had a different idea.

 

Maybe they should dump McKenna, just to make a point about focus and fundamentals. It’s just a bottom-of-the-roster guy, not like it will really hurt much. But I don’t think they will. Making roster moves because of momentary frustration just doesn’t seem like this FO’s MO. They’re looking at McKenna as a guy who has consistently been an above-average defender at all 3 OF spots, who was worth damn near 1 full fWAR in 175 PAs, and who has never chafed at his limited role on this team. They’re not going to cut him loose unless there’s an actual upgrade to be found.

Or as a GM sometime over the last few years he could have acquired someone that could have better filled the rule.  Who is in on that Cameron Is the next guy in line?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve never been a big McKenna fan.  We should be able to find a backup OF who is as good defensively, hits a little better and can steal some bases.  

That said, I don’t put his dropped ball in Boston in the category of a mental error or even a lazy play.   He just dropped it, like the Oakland RF dropped a routine fly ball against us last night.  It happens once in a blue moon.  It’s terrible, but it doesn’t reflect some character flaw of the player.  

The play last night was in a different category.  That’s not having your head in the game.  That’s not being aware of the game situation.  I don’t know that it gets McKenna sent to the minors, but it should get him a stern talking to from Hyde and Sanders.  

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we cut players because of mental lapses, the whole OF would be gone.

McKenna is fine for your 4th or more likely 5th OFer.  Good defense, has some speed, has a history that he can hit lefties well.  Was worth 1.3 WAR last year iirc.

You guys take a few negatives and blow them up into way more than they are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • You’re thinking Adley becomes something like the B-Rob/Mora extensions where the strictly best move would probably be to trade but an extension is highly defensible and even worst case scenario by no means kills the team? Mora/B-Rob, if memory serves, probably would’ve been fine had the rest of the team not been so directionless.
    • It's a crying shame when one very bad call by the home plate umpire, on an obvious strike, can cost a team the game.  It happened to us yesterday.  How critical can one single win can be at the end of the regular season, as for the playoffs coming?  
    • I'm guessing there must not be an "Anthony Santander 2024" thread....lol. 
    • Hopefully, if they have to trade Gunnar it's with a year and a half of control instead of a rental to maximize the return.
    • Gunnar would be the main one at this point. It's going to take the Witt contract plus, but he's the kind of player that you can build around on a 10 year deal.   There's a plenty of other options but I'd rather start with him. If he's not interested then you move on...all depending on what ownership will go for as well.
    • Just look at the Braves. Stuck with all those players and in 2nd place.
    • In a traditional/historical sense, Gunnar would more likely reside in the 3, 4 or 5 spots in the lineup. But this new-age baseball that we have seen evolve over the last few years does seem to place more of a priority on getting your best hitters the most ABs. As others have mentioned, look at Soto in his career, look at Ohtani, etc. But what hasn't been mentioned (that I've seen, maybe I missed it) is that this new era of baseball also shows us that a sub .200 hitter can be successful in the leadoff spot when they mash like Schwarber does for the Phils. I think it's just as likely that Hyder keeps penciling in Gunnar in the top spot because Gunnar feels comfortable there but also because of his ability to set the table for the rest of the lineup to start the game. That is really what the leadoff guy's job is to do. He's lead off with a homer what, five times this year? That's five games where the O's were on the board just one batter into their turn to hit. For a younger lineup like the O's have now, I think it's extremely important that they use whatever advantage they think they have as early in the game as possible. We've seen them struggle to score runs early in a lot of the games this year. They don't ever seem to lay down but battling from behind is not the ideal position to be, especially at the frequency that has been so far this year. I suspect that increased pressure may eventually catch up with them. So, yeah, if Gunnar is their best power hitter but also gives the team the best opportunity to score early, I'm fine with him hitting first in the order even if it means fewer guys on base when he's at the plate.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...