Jump to content

Specific Trade Ideas


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I think it’s more likely you could get one quality guy for Urias and use Stowers as a second piece. I remember what little the Orioles got in return when all they had was good bullpen arms to trade.

Urias is an interesting player but also isn’t a prospect or someone most teams will consider a building block for the future. And the Cardinals already have their even more versatile version in Brendan Donovan. I just don’t see it, here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, RZNJ said:

The Tigers need a lot and lose ERod after this year when he undoubtedly opts out.  You could expand it into a Foley or Alex Lange deal.   
 

Joey Ortiz plus to Detroit

If we can get the kick in of his opt-in, I'd do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HakunaSakata said:

Would you trade Urias / Stowers to the Cardinals for Hicks and Montgomery? Both would be FAs after this season. 

 

 

Yes.  Two guys without much of a home here.

I was a fan of trading Mateo in the offseason and sliding Henderson to SS and not signing Frazier.  But a little stuck now and Mateo won't get enough ABs to provide any return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understanding Elias's approach, I think we have to get comfortable with him trading only pieces that aren't untouchable, and won't mortgage the future.  Could be argued, but I think that would mean:

- Santander/Urias/Frazier/Stowers from the 40 man

- Wagner/Haskin/Johnson/Fabian/Preito (and below) from the minors. - maybe Norby/Ortiz/Beaver, but I think less likely

What kind of return can you get with just these part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't think it works that way, and I don't think I would do Ortiz for a rental unless it is someone better than Eduardo. 

The prospect cost should be about what the Comp pick would be. Ortiz is too much. Irvin, who has has no spot going forward, and Stowers for a COF with pop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

The prospect cost should be about what the Comp pick would be. Ortiz is too much. Irvin, who has has no spot going forward, and Stowers for a COF with pop.

Wow a 6th starter/swingman and a marginal prospect who hasn't been able to hit in the majors.  The O's should get an All Star for that combination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2023 at 3:02 PM, MarCakes21 said:

Understanding Elias's approach, I think we have to get comfortable with him trading only pieces that aren't untouchable, and won't mortgage the future.  Could be argued, but I think that would mean:

- Santander/Urias/Frazier/Stowers from the 40 man

- Wagner/Haskin/Johnson/Fabian/Preito (and below) from the minors. - maybe Norby/Ortiz/Beaver, but I think less likely

What kind of return can you get with just these part.

Norby is most certainly not going to have a place on the Baltimore Orioles especially if they keep Ortiz. It would be a horrific use of org resources to keep a top 100 prospect as a 26th man type of guy. In that scenario, he will rarely play and be given very limited opportunities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys at MLB Trade rumors were speculating in today's podcast that Max Scherzer could be available and that Cohen would be willing to eat most or even all of his salary for the right package of prospects. Cohen is apparently working on ways to rebuild some depth in his farm system.

Scherzer (Mets retain all his salary) for Norby or Ortiz, Stowers & DL Hall?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, bluedog said:

Guys at MLB Trade rumors were speculating in today's podcast that Max Scherzer could be available and that Cohen would be willing to eat most or even all of his salary for the right package of prospects. Cohen is apparently working on ways to rebuild some depth in his farm system.

Scherzer (Mets retain all his salary) for Norby or Ortiz, Stowers & DL Hall?

 

Maybe with Lindor and Baty they might have more interest in Norby? 

I'd like an explanation for Scherzer's 4.30 ERA in the first half, otherwise I'd be inclined to do the Norby, Stowers, Hall package.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2023 at 3:43 PM, AnythingO's said:

The prospect cost should be about what the Comp pick would be. Ortiz is too much. Irvin, who has has no spot going forward, and Stowers for a COF with pop.

I wonder if the Cardinals would have an interest in Irvin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Major League Leaderboards » 2024 » Center Fielders » Advanced Statistics | FanGraphs Baseball Not sure who's available in this list 150 PA minimum.
    • I have a hard time imagining a Trout deal will ever happen between Trout’s injuries, his contract, LAA assuredly still wanting some good prospects for him and the fact that trading the face of the franchise immediately after losing Ohtani would be an impossible sell to fans.  But even if all that were to align, I don’t see the Orioles coming out over the Phillies. If the Phillies weren’t a good team then maybe the Orioles could be a fit as otherwise closest to his hometown, but given they are also a top team Trout would likely say “I will only waive my NTC for Philly” and steer himself there. 
    • Wagner and one of those ML OFers aren’t stopping you from getting anyone. Kjerstad for Eovaldi is horrendous.
    • Perhaps he should be in the MVP conversation now. This Yahoo article has him #5 in the race. Not too shabby. https://sports.yahoo.com/checking-in-on-the-mlb-mvp-races-which-players-have-added-their-names-to-the-mix-through-the-first-third-of-the-season-213000493.html  
    • Never really thought about Mountcastle making it but when I did my voting was like he is right there because 1st base is one of weaker positions in todays game.  
    • In the ongoing discussion of CF targets, there is always the possibility that Cowser becomes the CF moving forward.  He's shown great improvement this season over what we saw last year.  Naturally, that would open another hole in LF, though LF is easier to fill than CF.  I prefer Cowser in LF, as it's a large territory to cover and he does a great job doing it, but that doesn't mean the idea of his taking over in CF is invalid.  The hope is that Mullins regains a facsimile of his prior form and puts this discussion on the backburner.  Keyword=hope... but I don't think any of us are counting on it.
    • It is amazing how little fanfare he gets on this site.  He does not make the flashy play like Gunnar at short but is the steady force that I think this team revolves around.  It is not a coincidence that this team started winning immediately when he was promoted.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...