Jump to content

Cade Povich 2024


emmett16

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, Frobby said:

But the "Billy Boxscore" stuff was irritating, and he should have stopped when you told him to.   

I can't be the only one who though Billy Boxscore was message board gold, was I? Don't get me wrong. He was over the top. He basically posted like an angry boomer who got onto the internets for the first time. I'm happy that Tony put an end to it (even though I did find a couple of his posts very interesting).

But Billy Boxscore, when referring to SG, was just hilarious to me.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The IL is walking 4.7 per nine, which is kind of astronomical. Across the minors walks are over 4.0 per nine everywhere except the AA Southern League. That was the case last year, too. Was a little lower in '22. But if you go back to '19 everyone (except a couple rookie leagues) were under 4.0. Is this because of the auto ball/strike system? I think I haven't been paying close enough attention to know.

For comparison, the Majors have been over 4.0 walks per nine just twice and just barely, in 1949-50. And in the last 60-70 years have only been over 3.5 a very small handful of times.

So the International League sees more walks this year than any year in MLB history, and it's not close. They're walking 44% more batters than the Majors are in '24. It would be nice if some aspiring analyst went and looked to see if AAA pitchers walk rates fall upon promotion to the majors, and vice versa.

Keep in mind that the International League uses robo-umps.   Major league umps call 12% of true balls as strikes, but only 3% of true strikes as balls (per Ump Scorecard).   So, IL pitchers are probably getting a much stingier strike zone than they see anywhere else.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Keep in mind that the International League uses robo-umps.   Major league umps call 12% of true balls as strikes, but only 3% of true strikes as balls (per Ump Scorecard).   So, IL pitchers are probably getting a much stingier strike zone than they see anywhere else.

 

Yea, that's my assumption. But this is probably also why there's talk of tweaking the real book strike zone (or how the robo-umps call it) because the real strike zone means there's going to be WAAAAY more walks than at any point in major league history. My guess is that the IL strike zone ported to MLB would result in runs jumping up to around 5 per game. And probably a non-linear effect where some pitchers who currently have borderline command quickly exit the league.

Imagine Felix Bautista never getting what's now a close call on a ball/strike. 😧

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Yea, that's my assumption. But this is probably also why there's talk of tweaking the real book strike zone (or how the robo-umps call it) because the real strike zone means there's going to be WAAAAY more walks than at any point in major league history. My guess is that the IL strike zone ported to MLB would result in runs jumping up to around 5 per game. And probably a non-linear effect where some pitchers who currently have borderline command quickly exit the league.

Imagine Felix Bautista never getting what's now a close call on a ball/strike. 😧

My view is, the game needs more offense, and if it can be generated by enforcing a true strike zone, I'm for it.  I think major league pitchers will adjust and the increase in walks will be significant but not as big as would occur if they just ocntinued throwing balls in the same spots where they were previously getting incorrect calls.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Frobby said:

My view is, the game needs more offense, and if it can be generated by enforcing a true strike zone, I'm for it.  I think major league pitchers will adjust and the increase in walks will be significant but not as big as would occur if they just ocntinued throwing balls in the same spots where they were previously getting incorrect calls.

That's an interesting point of view, that baseball needs more offense. The all-time MLB average runs/game is about 4.7, but that includes a bunch of very early seasons with 6, 8, 10+ runs/game. Since 1900 (and also since WWII) the average is about 4.4 runs/game.

So far this year the Majors are averaging 4.34, and as the weather warms up it will almost certainly nudge up towards 4.5 or 4.6. Since 2016 every season has been at or above the post-1900 averages for runs scored per game.

Even at the height of the PED era runs were only over 5.00 three times, and never more than the 5.14 of 2000. I think that increasing walks to 2024 IL levels would put the majors right around the 2000 runs scored level, if not a bit more.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

WTF is the “formulated consensus?”  Sounds like nonsense.  

Last years I posted about the PARS list. StS is another prospect ranking system that they use lots of different advanced stats.

These 2 just joined together and did the Avengers thing and came up with a combined list using their criteria.

Its probably a lot more valid than subjective rankings done because of draft status and “what you think”.

That said, it’s also based off of a SSS of stats, so there is only so much to take from it.

I do know both of these systems liked Povich last year too.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some Szymborski context hype for Povich being the best in the Internatlonal League in ERA by a lot.      Ibid K-bb to any inclined to weigh that heavily.

 Dan Szymborski: I think some of the perception is that people dont’ necessarily get just how massive the difference in offense between AAA and MLB is right

 Dan Szymborski: MLB is at 4.3 R/G now. International League is 5.2 and Pacific Coast at 5.8

 Dan Szymborski: Basically a AAA pitcher’s translation at the moment is their actual AAA numbers

 Dan Szymborski: while the difference in translation for AAA hitter and MLB hitter is more akin to the typical relationship between AA and MLB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Some Szymborski context hype for Povich being the best in the Internatlonal League in ERA by a lot.      Ibid K-bb to any inclined to weigh that heavily.

 Dan Szymborski: I think some of the perception is that people dont’ necessarily get just how massive the difference in offense between AAA and MLB is right

 Dan Szymborski: MLB is at 4.3 R/G now. International League is 5.2 and Pacific Coast at 5.8

 Dan Szymborski: Basically a AAA pitcher’s translation at the moment is their actual AAA numbers

 Dan Szymborski: while the difference in translation for AAA hitter and MLB hitter is more akin to the typical relationship between AA and MLB

Someone needs to tell Jack Leiter about the even money exchange for pitchers between AAA and MLB.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Someone needs to tell Jack Leiter about the even money exchange for pitchers between AAA and MLB.

Haha, I do think there is some inflated offensive numbers in AAA. I always assumed it was bad defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/10/2024 at 11:27 AM, LookinUp said:

I can't be the only one who though Billy Boxscore was message board gold, was I? Don't get me wrong. He was over the top. He basically posted like an angry boomer who got onto the internets for the first time. I'm happy that Tony put an end to it (even though I did find a couple of his posts very interesting).

But Billy Boxscore, when referring to SG, was just hilarious to me.

I'm loving the Billy Boxscore name.  Can we have a vote about a name change for SG to Billy Boxscore? 😝

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I'm loving the Billy Boxscore name.  Can we have a vote about a name change for SG to Billy Boxscore? 😝

I had some other names in mind but I’m down with Billy Boxscore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Notwithstanding age and position, I think I'm still on Team Adley for priority 1. One of the management talking points is around avoiding the risk of "creating complacency" when a ballplayer good enough to rate it gets their forever fortune. I think the other side of that being too stingy is "creating resentment" in your labor force. Burnes is an interesting cat as he's taken some actions that real world illustrate how created resentment looks in the cliches only constrained world of ballplayers and clubs interacting with media. I think Elias/Sig modeling a healthy respect for the opportunity Burnes has just about earned himself might help even if they know today their recommendation to ownership is an aggressive chase that already has the green light.     Information how Burnes fares the next 4-5 months is valuable, especially how his stuff plays against the best of the best once he's 30.     Fun fact ALCS Game 7 could fall 10.22.2024 precisely on Burnes' 30th birthday.   
    • Is Rich Hill an option? I believe he was looking to sign with someone mid year. Would we consider him?
    • They bring them up because we need to have guys on the bench available to pinch hit, pinch run, substitute for injured players, or give somebody a rest.   It's not a matter of not believing in them.  Some will get chances to start and some won't.   Just because a guy is starting every day in AAA doesn't mean he should get a chance to start every day (or even most to the time) in the majors.
    • My source for the dates of the options is the Orioles.com transactions page.  I'm going to retract what I said about the 20 day rule, as I had misremembered it.  What it actually says is:  "If a Player is optionally assigned for a total of less than 20 days in one championship season, the Player shall be credited with Major League service during the period of such optional assignment(s); provided, however, that a Player shall not be credited with Major League service under this provision if the Player had zero days of Major League serv ice in the current season prior to the optional assignment and after the optional assignment was unconditionally released or assigned outright and not subsequently added to the Active List for the remainder of the championship season." So forget what I said about that.  Now, what I am not sure about is whether Vespi's recall to be the 27th man in St. Louis due to the suspended game counts towards his option total.   The answer to that isn't found in the CBA, but in a document called "Major League Rules" that used to be public, but apparently no longer is.   I am not talking about the document that describes the rules of play, but another document that contains, for example, the details of the "Rule 4 draft" and the "Rule 5 draft."
    • And is it fair to say 10-15 runs equates to about 1 to 1.5 wins? (Again, that's in a worst-order scenario.)
    • It’s a definite probable no for me. I don’t say that to split hairs.  So let me explain.    There is no way that the Orioles come out on an investment like the one it will take to extend Burnes. But would I, given his age and the likelihood of injury?  No.    Unless….I was prepared to spend twice that or more to land another pitcher on top of Burnes. The idea being if you’re in you’re in.    I cannot speak to the finances of the new ownership but the only way I would purchase someone like Burnes would be to buy 2 in hopes of having one. While still knowing the advantage if you have both and the risks of both are hurt.    Could the Orioles afford $600M? I don’t know.  Should any team?  No. But we live in a world where the Dodgers are spending Billions. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...