Jump to content

Look out for Kevin Gausman


wildcard

Recommended Posts

The only real difference, it seams to me, is that you seem much more confident in Gausman's ability to prove himself during spring training than others do. If the O's do not sign a veteran starter, I think Gausman could well earn that spot over others like Britton, Matusz, Johnson, etal.. If they do sign a veteran starter (not including Yoon for the purpose of this conversation), I think Gausman is likely destined for Norfolk - almost despite anything he does in ST.

Either way Gausman will get plenty of chances to start next year as will all those guys given we used 14 starters last year and had a pretty good year injury wise with only Chen doing real DL days....Also we only had one starter fall out of the rotation do to performance (Hammel). Given that it is pretty clear we are sorely lacking in starting pitching and all guys who could be half decent will get a chance to start at some point next year given the current roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The only real difference, it seams to me, is that you seem much more confident in Gausman's ability to prove himself during spring training than others do. If the O's do not sign a veteran starter, I think Gausman could well earn that spot over others like Britton, Matusz, Johnson, etal.. If they do sign a veteran starter (not including Yoon for the purpose of this conversation), I think Gausman is likely destined for Norfolk - almost despite anything he does in ST.

Actually, I think there is a bigger chance that Gausman gets sent to AAA to start the year than there is that he starts the year with the O's. But I think its up to what Gausman shows in ST where he starts the year. If he shows consistently command of three quality pitches he starts with the O's.

I do have more confidence in Gausman than Norris at this point. If the O's sign a veteran starter, I think Gausman gets more starts this year and will do better than Norris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I think there is a bigger chance that Gausman gets sent to AAA to start the year than there is that he starts the year with the O's. But I think its up to what Gausman shows in ST where he starts the year. If he shows consistently command of three quality pitches he starts with the O's.

I do have more confidence in Gausman than Norris at this point. If the O's sign a veteran starter, I think Gausman gets more starts this year and will do better than Norris.

Norris is ok as long as the O's realize he's a 5 to 6 innings a game pitcher and are able to adjust for that. He gets crushed once he gets close to 100 pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norris has his flaws but we don't have 3 starters better than him so he will start a significant number of games this year.

Even if we sign Aj and Gausman has a great ST and pitches to an ERA of 3 next year in the rotation from OD I would bet Norris starts at least 20 games next year.

You need 7 viable starters at least to stay a playoff contender and this team is only 5 deep and that's with everyone staying health and effective and Gausman proving he's ready....Which I would say is about a 10% chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norris has his flaws but we don't have 3 starters better than him so he will start a significant number of games this year.

Even if we sign Aj and Gausman has a great ST and pitches to an ERA of 3 next year in the rotation from OD I would bet Norris starts at least 20 games next year.

You need 7 viable starters at least to stay a playoff contender and this team is only 5 deep and that's with everyone staying health and effective and Gausman proving he's ready....Which I would say is about a 10% chance.

Tillman, Gonzalez and Chen are all better than what I have seen from Norris so far.

Agree the O's need and do have 6 or 7 starters. What the O's really need is better pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If his elbow is better, what you see from Norris this season should be better than that as well.

I think there is a really question if Norris can be a below 4.00 starter in the AL East. I am not convinced he can. He will have to show me. He seems to be a pitcher that he throwing a max effort all the time. That is hard to do and be successful in the AL East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a really question if Norris can be a below 4.00 starter in the AL East. I am not convinced he can. He will have to show me. He seems to be a pitcher that he throwing a max effort all the time. That is hard to do and be successful in the AL East.

As a number 5, if he can go 170 IP and put up a 4.30, I'm fine with that. The key is to add a guy in front of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the AL East is a great division but I think we tend to give it too much credit. On the Astros, he had to face the lineups of the Angels, A's, Mariners, and the Rangers. Is that group so inferior, if at all, to Toronto, Boston, NY, and Tampa Bay?

Astros were the worst team in MLB. The Mariners were worse than the Blue Jays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a number 5, if he can go 170 IP and put up a 4.30, I'm fine with that. The key is to add a guy in front of him.

Would you still be alright with that from Norris if he competes with Gausman and Gausman can put up a below 4.00 ERA and go the same number of innings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you still be alright with that from Norris if he competes with Gausman and Gausman can put up a below 4.00 ERA and go the same number of innings?

I'd like to get more innings from someone in front of him. If Gausman beats him out for the #5 job, Norris moves to the bullpen or gets traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...