Jump to content

Playing in an empty stadium is a terrible decision


atomic

Recommended Posts

World class athletes completely shut out the crowd noise to focus on the task at hand. All this hand wringing is insane. The games needed to be played. The two teams are already being screwed in a major way by the DH later this year. This is not that big of a deal. I can't believe people are losing their minds about it. It will still be on TV.

Some people were seemingly born with a stick up their butt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Camden Yards: If you build it they will come. Just not today. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/gamestillcounts?src=hash">#gamestillcounts</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Orioles">@Orioles</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/masnOrioles">@masnOrioles</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/whitesox">@whitesox</a></p>— Jim Palmer (@Jim22Palmer) <a href="
">April 29, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Hahaha...I love Jim Palmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the season requires a team to play 162 games. It is pretty simple. Games are only not made up when both teams are well out of the play-offs late in the year. If they didn't find a way to play the third game today, the CWS/BO would have had to find another open day on the calendar and fly in for a single game AGAIN because they don't ever come back to Baltimore OR they would have had to give up another home game and play a DH during the one visit to Chicago. I would have been fine with either of those decisions too, but I think the plan to play with no crowd is much less disruptive to both teams.

This whole viewpoint that somehow the fans are getting shafted is pretty comical IMO. The game is at 2 PM. Attendance on a normal game at this time would have been pitiful. Ticketholders are being provided a way to recoup their money or attend another game. The game is on TV so it can be watched live or recorded. The poor fans. LOL. It all smacks of hubris to me.

By the way, if the game was played and open to the public, the season ticket holders would have been required to attend or lose that ticket. Does that sound fair? The vendors and other workers would have been required to get to the stadium and work. A lot of them have day jobs that would be tough to navigate with 24 hours notice. Does that sound fair? Is it fair to make them cross the NG on the way to stadium through neighborhoods that may or may not be settled today?

Think about this a little people. Your viewpoint is terribly small minded.

Isn't the National Guard and the Police using a lot of the OPACY parking spaces for their staging area?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They still have a television audience. I have a feeling ratings might be higher than normal today.

And while I would like to know why other stadiums weren't considered, I am not going to label it incompetence on the part of the Os. Especially without knowing how much input Manfred had. Besides, as everyone should remember from the Ravens Opening Day fiasco a few years ago, the White Sox have to approve any change of venue or time change. So perhaps the Os aren't as I competent as you would hope.

Since NOBODY can attend the game do we scrap the Black out BS on MLB TV?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am looking forward to watching today's game on MLB.TV. The lack of a crowd will make it a different kind of experience, but it's still Orioles baseball.

This is where my head is too. It's not a perfect solution but it's baseball. I also agree with others that said one of the Tampa series should have been transferred to Baltimore. MLB said no. I would really like to know the reasoning on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you really know the Nationals wasn't asked?

Actually the Nats weren't asked. Even though Manfred suggested it. Sounds like the Orioles FO as being pig headed because of the MASN issue.

"That solution — in addition to moving the Tampa Bay series to Florida — won out over what seemed like a more obvious move: simply play the games at Nationals Park in Washington, which sits less than 40 miles south of Camden Yards and will be vacant through the weekend as the Nationals complete a road trip. Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred suggested that when he was in Baltimore for a previously scheduled meeting Monday.

There are, though, other forces at work that complicated such a solution. The Nationals and the Orioles are embroiled in a legal dispute over revenues generated by the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network, the regional sports network that is co-owned by the two teams and carries both their games. A Nationals spokeswoman said Monday that the club was never approached by the Orioles or MLB to serve as a host. Bader declined comment on whether the MASN issue played a role in the Orioles’ decision-making.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/orioles-to-host-home-game-against-the-white-sox-in-an-empty-stadium/2015/04/28/b534ea48-ede6-11e4-8abc-d6aa3bad79dd_story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is where my head is too. It's not a perfect solution but it's baseball. I also agree with others that said one of the Tampa series should have been transferred to Baltimore. MLB said no. I would really like to know the reasoning on that.

The Rays didn't want to. No team will reduce their schedule and their fan's plans if they don't have to. The Rays will gain very little from this weekend's series down there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually the Nats weren't asked. Even though Manfred suggested it. Sounds like the Orioles FO as being pig headed because of the MASN issue.

"That solution — in addition to moving the Tampa Bay series to Florida — won out over what seemed like a more obvious move: simply play the games at Nationals Park in Washington, which sits less than 40 miles south of Camden Yards and will be vacant through the weekend as the Nationals complete a road trip. Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred suggested that when he was in Baltimore for a previously scheduled meeting Monday.

There are, though, other forces at work that complicated such a solution. The Nationals and the Orioles are embroiled in a legal dispute over revenues generated by the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network, the regional sports network that is co-owned by the two teams and carries both their games. A Nationals spokeswoman said Monday that the club was never approached by the Orioles or MLB to serve as a host. Bader declined comment on whether the MASN issue played a role in the Orioles’ decision-making.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/orioles-to-host-home-game-against-the-white-sox-in-an-empty-stadium/2015/04/28/b534ea48-ede6-11e4-8abc-d6aa3bad79dd_story.html

I wonder if the roles were reversed, if the Nationals would have come to Baltimore and played?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Thats how you frame.  You bring the ball up into the zone.  If your glove is set at target and then you go down for the low pitch momentum and gravity will carry the glove and ball lower and out of the zone.  Same with inside/outside pieces, if you show target and move out towards the edge of plate, momentum will carry glove & ball further away. Catchers are taught the show target first, then drop glove down and catch the ball with a motioning coming up.  Same for inside/outside pitch’s, the glove will start further away and then you catch it with a motion bringing it into zone.   It’s much more difficult to do hence the missed ball (a lot of that at lower levels).  The very good framers do it effortlessly and smoothly and can bring the ball into zone for strikes.  Gone are the days of “stick it” & turn your wrist.  
    • Official release for the John Martyn 1978 Rockpalast concert.  
    • I like the move.  I would have liked to have gotten a better arm, but I think it's a pretty fair trade.  Philly's probably grade out slightly higher, but which team fairs better this year because of the trade depends on a number of factors. The move does create some space for our young OF, but Pache is likely just a late inning replacement and that likely just shifts the pressure elsewhere. Also think Hays' comments are entirely overblown.  What the hell was he supposed to say getting traded from the #2 team so far to the #1? Lastly, in the same way moving Mancini to Houston was good for us and good for a respected Oriole, I like the opportunity Hays will have in Philly.
    • Agreed every player will say that going to a new team.  What they gonna say man that team is awful their organization is run terrible.   It’s always the same cliche responds.  I like our chances that are a team competing or if you go to a bottom team it is I like my chances to play they are an upcoming team with some young talent that I think I can help.  
    • Hays I 100% think he was bitter and resentful. About a month ago he had a decently big game and they interviewed him on field and he didn’t even seem happy. Then, Melanie asked him what it was like to be in left field with the (I don’t remember what it was called) Cowser cheering section. He did not seem amused at all. So yeah, prob another reason it was best he was traded. 
    • Just what @398 to Leftsaid in his post.  I was sitting in my car listening to the whole interview and Law said something like his reporting that Hayes wouldn’t be that missed in the locker room.  It surprised me and Bob never followed up on it.  It was just a quick remark like that.  
    • Iron also dulls iron. Depends on how they interact.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...