Jump to content

Wow, Kim is untouchable


cm1290

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 732
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If by everyone you mean like six people. I never expected him to be the savior as some did a month ago, and don't see hiw hus performance or outlook is so bad, either.

I agree. I hoped for a savior, never expected it. He's really struggled lately which was to be expected. But, that doesn't mean he can't be a great player for this franchise if we have patience with him and he continues to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would I know where it's coming from? I was wrong. He has four home runs, despite tanking over the last 3 weeks. So, he's on pace for 16 and if the one that was brought back wasn't, he'd already be on pace for 20 as a rookie. Amazing to me how anyone could dispute the argument that he has 20 hr power when he's basically on that pace as a rookie while really struggling lately.

Pace isn't 4/44*162. Pace is current number + (reasonable pace based on history). Rickard's minor league HR rate was 4 per 500 PAs. So I'd expect him to end the year with about six or eight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if it is less than 6 months, you round down.

It isn't nitpicking it is you being so eager to try and correct me you couldn't spend 30 seconds to check first.

I'm done.

You are never interested in actual discussion.

You just aren't.

You have no desire to learn or to grow.

I'm over it.

I learn every day. I recognize the fact that I'm often wrong. But, that doesn't stop me from objecting to posters who have never admitted they were wrong and act like they know more about baseball than I do, when they don't. Have a great night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pace isn't 4/44*162. Pace is current number + (reasonable pace based on history). Rickard's minor league HR rate was 4 per 500 PAs. So I'd expect him to end the year with about six or eight.

I said his ceiling, his potential was 20. If he blossoms, I would expect close to that this year. If he continues to be over matched, he may not reach 10 because he won't play. His home run total is dependent on his ability to adjust to his current troubles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why but for some reason folks take being critical of a player as having a personal dislike of them.

I don't get it.

Because gang mentality disturbs me. One thing you do well is always defend your opinion. Most jump on board after a few start..

Rickard may or may not be the answer, but dude was red hot for how many months? Don't relegate him yet. Patience, lord know we had enough with Ryan Flaherty. Maybe his power will develop. If not, still mighty successful. Just give the dude a break. Pitchers adjusted, so may he.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because gang mentality disturbs me. One thing you do well is always defend your opinion. Most jump on board after a few start..

Rickard may or may not be the answer, but dude was red hot for how many months? Don't relegate him yet. Patience, lord know we had enough with Ryan Flaherty. Maybe his power will develop. If not, still mighty successful. Just give the dude a break. Pitchers adjusted, so may he.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've stated before that I am fine with him playing.

I don't want him playing every day and he shouldn't be leading off against RHP.

If this is a playoff team can they afford to have a guy doing OJT at the top of the lineup?

For the record what have I said about him that is unfair or inaccurate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have my doubts that he's a minus-2-win player. You're doing the same thing brianod did with Rickard's HR "pace".

Pretty sure we don't have an abundance of evidence from his time in the minors that would directly correlate to how he rates compared to the standard of a MLB replacement player.

So I would say it isn't that analogous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To Brianod (since I can't seem to reply to a quote now): Problem is dude, you've been so dismissive of Kim without giving him the same benefit of the doubt as you give Rickard

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I said Kim earned more playing time two weeks ago. I recognize what Buck recognizes about him. His value is obp. He's below average defensively, he's average at best running and he has shown no hr power. Hr power in camden yards is a really nice to have. All that being said, if he can achieve a 350-370 obp, I'm all for him playing every day. All I've ever said is that Rickard has a higher ceiling. I've never said Rickard would end up better than Kim. I say let him play and see how he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm not sure how they get there, but I believe that this is a better team with Westburg at 3B and ideally Holliday at 2B rather than Mayo at 3B and Westburg at 2B.   Actually, any combo will be better with Westburg at third.
    • I’ll be happy to eat my words if a list comes out with us having 3 in the top 5.  I’d bet strongly against it.   
    • Guys like Wynns who’ve had some major league experience make decent money even when in the minors.  Still, it must be disappointing to be hopping from team to team and getting a few major league games here and there but not really sticking.  Not an easy life.  
    • Nope.  Believe it or not I would be much happier to have the Os win the WS and I never bet them at all than for me to have bet them to win the division for example, they do so, and not get out of round 1 of the playoffs.  Sure I make money.  But so what? Money is just money.  Winning a WS is pure joy.   I just made the point about me betting to show that I am not afraid to be critical and a realist even though I did put my money where my mouth is. 
    • Show me an objective source that has reranked the prospects since their initial lists?  The draft is July 16th.  Usually they do a reranking a few weeks after that.  We could have 3 in the top 5.  We have 3 in the top 18 currently.  It's not so far fetched.  
    • Most players in the NFL and NBA are elite/explosive athletes just look at their measurables/testing numbers. As a matter of fact, when someone succeeds in the NBA in particular without being one it is an outlier (Luka Doncic). In football even the non-uber athletes (Offensive guards, defensive tackles, most tight ends are still fantastic athletes) Ever seen Aaron Donald up close Justin Madubuike? However, baseball is a different game. Some baseball players are elite athletes. But many are not as it is not a requirement to be great at the sport, since it is mostly a hand-eye coordination sport. Deion Sanders was a great athlete and an okay baseball player. Michael Jordan sucked at baseball. But again, I have to assume that you know this and are just typing words for the sake of it. Do you think Tony Gwynn could beat any of those people in any kind of athletic contest? But yet he was miles and away a better baseball player.
    • That's a point I was trying to make earlier in the season, but you did a much better job than I. Holliday could turn out to be a great player, but still not be anywhere near what Henderson is. Once he gets his chance again hopefully he's ready because those 2 together would make an excellent combo.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...