Jump to content

It's time for a change


AZRon

Recommended Posts

A quality start is a statistic for a starting pitcher defined as a game in which the pitcher completes at least six innings and permits no more than three earned runs.

Prior to tonight's game against the Blue Jays, the Orioles had 30 of them in 76 games.  That ranked 12th in the AL, just ahead of the Twins' 29 of 75 games, and 3 ahead of the team with the fewest, the White Sox who have played 76 games.  The Red Sox lead with 43 quality starts in 77 games.

Here's the record for the current rotation:

                          GS   QS 
Dylan Bundy      16     12
Wade Miley        16      5
Kevin Gausman 17      4
Ubaldo Jimenez 10      2
Chris Tillman      10      2

Even with the weakened back end of the bullpen, I believe the O's would have won at least 3 more games given an additional 3 quality starts.  That would mean a middling 33 quality starts and a 41 and 35 record. Heck, even Alec Asher had 3 quality starts in the 6 games that he started.

Anyone care to do the research under various scenarios of reliever effectiveness?

So, if you are supposed to be a major league starting pitcher (or getting paid like one) and you fail to deliver a quality start in 70 to 80% of your starts, do you make a major adjustment in your approach?  To date, I've seen Gausman change his position on the rubber, increase the use of his split while reducing the use of the slider and, maybe, lower his arm angle. I've seen no adjustments from Miley and Tillman and, as for Jimenez, forget it; he either cannot or will not change.

If I'm in field management (pitching coach or manager) or general management (Duquette), I demand that you change your approach (physical and mental) or we'll change you out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AZRon said:

A quality start is a statistic for a starting pitcher defined as a game in which the pitcher completes at least six innings and permits no more than three earned runs.

Prior to tonight's game against the Blue Jays, the Orioles had 30 of them in 76 games.  That ranked 12th in the AL, just ahead of the Twins' 29 of 75 games, and 3 ahead of the team with the fewest, the White Sox who have played 76 games.  The Red Sox lead with 43 quality starts in 77 games.

Here's the record for the current rotation:

                          GS   QS 
Dylan Bundy      16     12
Wade Miley        16      5
Kevin Gausman 17      4
Ubaldo Jimenez 10      2
Chris Tillman      10      2

Even with the weakened back end of the bullpen, I believe the O's would have won at least 3 more games given an additional 3 quality starts.  That would mean a middling 33 quality starts and a 41 and 35 record. Heck, even Alec Asher had 3 quality starts in the 6 games that he started.

Anyone care to do the research under various scenarios of reliever effectiveness?

So, if you are supposed to be a major league starting pitcher (or getting paid like one) and you fail to deliver a quality start in 70 to 80% of your starts, do you make a major adjustment in your approach?  

So the best team in the league is at 56%, and you're setting 70-80% as your threshold for demanding changes?   Good luck with that!    I wonder how many pitchers in MLB meet that standard?

In any event, these pitchers have all the incentive in the world to be as good as they can be, and the team has all the incentive in the world to replace them if they have someone they think might be better.     But we don't have good options.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Tillman is just done. Ubaldo is gone after this year. Miley might be gone after this year. We'll build the rotation back. Bring in Alex Cobb, Yu Darvish if we keep Miley. Maybe bring up Lucas long

Darvish? Angelos is not going to spend for a TOR starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Tillman is just done. Ubaldo is gone after this year. Miley might be gone after this year. We'll build the rotation back. Bring in Alex Cobb, Yu Darvish if we keep Miley. Maybe bring up Lucas long

You have any idea what Yu Darvish is going to cost?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

So the best team in the league is at 56%, and you're setting 70-80% as your threshold for demanding changes?   Good luck with that!    I wonder how many pitchers in MLB meet that standard?

In any event, these pitchers have all the incentive in the world to be as good as they can be, and the team has all the incentive in the world to replace them if they have someone they think might be better.     But we don't have good options.   

No, he is saying that our current rotation is not getting QS 70-80% of the time. The bar is 20%. Right now we have two guys at 20% and 3 guys below 30%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

So the best team in the league is at 56%, and you're setting 70-80% as your threshold for demanding changes?   Good luck with that!    I wonder how many pitchers in MLB meet that standard?

In any event, these pitchers have all the incentive in the world to be as good as they can be, and the team has all the incentive in the world to replace them if they have someone they think might be better.     But we don't have good options.   

There are 103 pitchers with starts listed here: AL starting pitchers QS

93 have better than 20% quality starts; 87 have 30% or better. Even Yovani Gallardo has 29%.

As I have posted before, even with the O's volatile offense, their below average outfield defense and their weakened backend of the bullpen, a small performance improvement in the starting pitching would have placed them in a better competitve position.

As to incentives, "human nature" (even that of millionaire MLB pitching veterans) is to resist change. However, there are exceptional examples that have yielded positive results: Marcus Stroman, Luis Tiant, Cliff Lee, Jamie Moyer, etc.

As to our lack of "good options" (I assume you're referring to the menagerie of Duquette acquisitions and the O's minor league "prospects"), the results by cycling through that tangle might prove better -- even Tyler Wilson and Jason Aquino threw quality starts in their only opportunities and Alec Asher has a 50% success rate in his starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

No, he is saying that our current rotation is not getting QS 70-80% of the time. The bar is 20%. Right now we have two guys at 20% and 3 guys below 30%.

Ah, that makes more sense.   The wording of the sentence was a bit ambiguous and I misunderstood his intent.   

Overall, I still don't think the problem here is that these pitchers are too stubborn about their approach.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Tillman is just done. Ubaldo is gone after this year. Miley might be gone after this year. We'll build the rotation back. Bring in Alex Cobb, Yu Darvish if we keep Miley. Maybe bring up Lucas long

For better or worse, I am pretty sure any significant improvement in the starters will come from growing young arms -- those acquired in the draft or through trades for one of our valuable assets like Manny or Britton or Brach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the record on quality starts for the current rotation:

                          GS   QS       %
Dylan Bundy      17     12   70.6
Wade Miley        17      5    29.4
Kevin Gausman 18      5    27.8
Ubaldo Jiménez 11      3    27.3
Chris Tillman      11      2    18.2

Currently, 66 AL pitchers (with 8 or more starts) have quality starts in a minimum of 40% of their starts; the O's have only Bundy.  The list includes Andrew Triggs and Ariel Miranda.  If you lower the bar to 30% (except for Bundy, none of the current O's starters meet this low bar), add 10 more pitchers, including Miguel Gonzalez.

We'll see if Kevin Gausman has "turned the corner" -- at least he has made some changes: his position on the rubber, his arm angle, and reduction/elimination of his weak slider.

I continue to plead for major approach changes for Miley, Tillman and Jiménez.  Take more time or less time between pitches, pause at some point in the windup, throw all pitches from the stretch, point the glove hand toward the target; change the pitch target;  turn back to home plate prior to the pitch delivery; etc.

Substitute from the Duquette menagerie for those unable or unwilling to attempt change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, AZRon said:

Here's the record on quality starts for the current rotation:

                          GS   QS       %
Dylan Bundy      17     12   70.6
Wade Miley        17      5    29.4
Kevin Gausman 18      5    27.8
Ubaldo Jiménez 11      3    27.3
Chris Tillman      11      2    18.2

Currently, 66 AL pitchers (with 8 or more starts) have quality starts in a minimum of 40% of their starts; the O's have only Bundy.  The list includes Andrew Triggs and Ariel Miranda.  If you lower the bar to 30% (except for Bundy, none of the current O's starters meet this low bar), add 10 more pitchers, including Miguel Gonzalez.

We'll see if Kevin Gausman has "turned the corner" -- at least he has made some changes: his position on the rubber, his arm angle, and reduction/elimination of his weak slider.

I continue to plead for major approach changes for Miley, Tillman and Jiménez.  Take more time or less time between pitches, pause at some point in the windup, throw all pitches from the stretch, point the glove hand toward the target; change the pitch target;  turn back to home plate prior to the pitch delivery; etc.

Substitute from the Duquette menagerie for those unable or unwilling to attempt change.

My thing is the three guys you mention aren't exactly youngsters.  They should know their mechanics better than anyone plus have the experience.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

My thing is the three guys you mention aren't exactly youngsters.  They should know their mechanics better than anyone plus have the experience.  

So, you're saying: if what you doing isn't working -- keep doing it?:D

Baseball history is replete with "veteran" pitchers making successful adjustments in order to regain or improve their effectiveness  later in their careers.  That same history is also full of "veteran" pitchers who failed to regain their former effectiveness because they were unwilling or unable to make the necessary adjustments.

Command slips, control fades, breaking ball sharpness dulls, velocity dips, pitch tells are noted and broadcast, etc.  As I said in the opening post -- it's time for a change.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I mean more notable for anything. It's been around 60 years and you don't even have a State Senator or CEO to crow about?
    • If Mayo and Holliday are here next year, one of them most certainly has to move to the OF. There is only one position available. Henderson, Westburg, and Mountcastle are all starting caliber INFs. For a team who is trying to win a WS (like I assume the goal will be again next season) I don't see the wisdom in introducing too much possible volatility at one time due to the variance in performance that young players (first time big leaguers can produce). To have a lineup where Holliday, Mayo, (Kjerstad and Norby for that matter) are all trying to acclimate/figuring out how to hit big league pitching all at the same time does not seem like a wise move and it definitely doesn't seem like something Elias would do. I'm not sure that I see this is a move that would be ultra-risky or a move that would be for a rebuilding team. We are obviously going to be in the postseason and we could go all the way. If we were to turn around after a successful season and then jettison all vets and go with a rebuild lineup with half or more being occupied with young players prospects, I think it would come with a lot of negative PR and most likely a negative fan reaction. Teams who are successful and have young stars/cornerstone players under multiple years of control/contract (Rutschman, Henderson) don't typically decide to rebuild/reset in the midst of that. That could be detrimental to the teams bottom line and that would be a hard sell to an owner who has just taken over the team.
    • Yes, Boras clients occasionally sign extensions.  No, Boras won’t prevent a client that wants to sign an extension from doing so.  Yes, Boras clients sign fewer pre-FA extensions than clients of other agencies (based on comparing his share of pre-FA extensions vs. his larger share of MLB players). That’s because of either the advice he gives, attracting clients with a similar philosophy, or both. Scott has never signed a player with less than two years of service time to a long-term extension.  He has only signed 1 pre-arb player to a long-term extension which was 13 years ago (Carlos Gonzalez). Expectations of signing Gunnar or Westburg to extensions need to be calibrated against this reality.  
    • A.J. Preller is apparently a good talent evaluator and an aggressive GM.   I get the feeling he thinks they can keep replacing prospects through the draft and J2 signings.   He’s kind of painted himself into a corner with the current team.  He traded for Arráez.   The Padres were already rumored to be interested in Crochet.  I wouldn’t put it past Heller.  Of course, Crochet isn’t a rental so it’s not quite selling your soul to the devil to trade an Ethan Salas for him.  Not sure what else they have to offer.
    • I didn't really know either until the news of his death, which was kind of a lightbulb moment for me in relation to the extreme all-in approach the Padres had been taking in recent years. The family has kept a lot of details private, but from reading a couple of the articles after he passed, he had already gone through a couple of different tough cancer fights and it was known around the industry that his health was tenuous. I don't know if he got a specific prognosis before the end, but it seems clear that he wasn't taking any time for granted and wanted to push to make things happen while he could. It's not really relevant for the O's, but it has come up now and then when some folks start asking why the O's couldn't try to spend like the Padres - it's clear now that the Padres were in a unique situation.
    • No, but my family should get a good dose.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...