Jump to content

Santander


OriolesMagic83

Recommended Posts

One more... Rich Coggins.  Hit .319 in 110 games in 1973.  The next year he hit .243 in 113 games and then after that he never made it in to more than 64 games in a season.  

Coggins did manage to play in 78 more games than Jim Traber did though.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

One more... Rich Coggins.  Hit .319 in 110 games in 1973.  The next year he hit .243 in 113 games and then after that he never made it in to more than 64 games in a season.  

 

He and Bumbry were quite the exciting duo in ‘73.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BRobinsonfan said:

One more... Rich Coggins.  Hit .319 in 110 games in 1973.  The next year he hit .243 in 113 games and then after that he never made it in to more than 64 games in a season.  

Coggins did manage to play in 78 more games than Jim Traber did though.   

 

Ultimately, in terms of O's history, the important thing about Coggins is that we were able to trade him and a near-finished Dave McNally to the Expos for KEN SINGLETON and MIKE TORREZ!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BRobinsonfan said:

I remember that... there was a Baseball Digest article about them being the outfield of the future for the O's.  

In a way they were right: Bumbry became our CF for twelve years and Coggins was part of the package that helped bring Ken Singleton to the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/25/2019 at 12:05 PM, Gofannon said:

Two others, and then we can return to Santander (address unknown):

Chito Martinez - .321/.361/.599 through his first 40 games in 1991; 

Curtis Goodwin - .363 BA, .408 OBP and 16 stolen bases in his first 37 games in 1995.

Reality took a little longer with Chito than with Curtis Goodwin.

I remember Godwin’s start well. An amazing first month or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BRobinsonfan said:

One more... Rich Coggins.  Hit .319 in 110 games in 1973.  The next year he hit .243 in 113 games and then after that he never made it in to more than 64 games in a season.  

Coggins did manage to play in 78 more games than Jim Traber did though.   

 

Coggins and Bumbry came up together and started the season somewhat similarly.  But if my memory is right, it didn't take long to see the Bee was the far better player.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is strange Santander's only had middling stats at Norfolk the last two years but has found his stroke in Baltimore. Oh well. His name will keep getting put in the lineup since his defense has been a plus so far too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, O-The-Memories said:

To be fair, Matos did have one really good year. If Santander can ever have that level of success over the course of a full season you would have to be encouraged.

Yeah, Matos had a 4 rWAR season over 486 plate appearances. He definitely shouldn't be in the Curtis Goodwin, Jim Traber, David Newhan conversation.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

It took about a year.  Both had very strong rookie seasons.  Both, without checking, had sophomore slumps but Coggins was worse and never recovered.  Those 73-74 O's were fun teams.  They stole bases and didn't rely on the three run homer.  Weaver showed he adapted to his team's talent.  IIRC, Coggins platooned with Rettenmund in RF, Baylor and Bumbry in LF, and Blair still in CF.  Can that be right?

My memory was off.  For some reason, I thought Coggins tailed off badly after a really good start, but he was very good the whole season.  Wow, he's 68 years old now - hard to believe it was that long ago.  Yeah, 1973 was a fun team - with Bumbry and Coggins running around, and Grich and Baylor and the old guys slowing down but still getting it done.. Tommy Davis was the DH..  Even Earl Williams at catcher - not much of a catcher, but he hit ok that year., while Davey Johnson somehow hit 43 homers for Atlanta.  Davey probably figured out that launch angle stuff before it was ever a thing.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

 

This was Santander's 1st home run since July 24th.

 

 

(vs. YANKEES, 8/06)

 

NUMBER 9

 

ANTHONY ROGER SANTANDER 

ANTHONY ROGER SANTANDER 

ANTHONY ROGER SANTANDER 

ANTHONY ROGER SANTANDER 

ANTHONY ROGER SANTANDER 

ANTHONY ROGER SANTANDER 

ANTHONY ROGER SANTANDER

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Luzardo has certainly experienced a down year compared to 2023. He has had some injuries (and currently on IL with a lumbar issue) and his statcast data is worse. The walk rate is still good but the K rate has dropped big time.  He is still missing bats but players aren’t chasing as much. I still think this is a guy that is and will be on the O’s radar, provided that they are comfortable with the medicals. They still would have him for 2 more years as well and he doesn’t turn 27 until the end of September, so you basically will have him for what are historically his peak years. Miami has said they aren’t trading him but I’m not sure I buy that. Outside of 2023, he has had his share of injury issues and he’s a big risk to acquire but he’s also a big risk to keep. The question is, what will Miami need for him to decide to move him?  Right now, his value is obviously way down. If you are Miami do you keep him and hope he gets back healthy, finishes strong and then you trade him for more  in the offseason than you likely can get now or do you cut your losses, get 70ish cents on the dollar and make sure you get something of value? If the Os were to put a deal of Norby, Stowers, Beavers, Tavera and Urias on the table for Luzardo and Nardi, would Miami turn that down?  Would they get a better offer? I think both answers to those questions are maybe. I think he’s a tough one to gauge but the team control and the fact that he is left handed is huge. Get him with our coaches and our program and on a real baseball team and things could be different for him..change of scenery type thing. I was luke warm on acquiring him before because I was worried about his health but if we can get him without trading our absolute best assets, that makes him even make intriguing. Add in getting Nardi and I think this is a package that could help the Os a lot. Its a risk and it certainly hurts some of your depth but it also opens up a door for Mayo and eventually Holliday and it keeps your absolute best prospects here.
    • I would not be surprised to see Boston finishing 2nd in the AL East this season with the Yanks 3rd
    • The O’s will play MLB games in a MiLB ballpark next year.  For those who are thinking “road trip!”, consider this about Sacramento.  While announcers were raving about the weather in Oakland this past weekend, in Sacramento July 5, 6 & 7 daily highs were 108, 110 & 106.  I would imagine day games will be limited.  
    • The Semien pick and the Holmes pick seem to be the two biggest reaches which is interesting since neither were the only rep for their team so there isn't even that logic there.  Josh Smith or Jordan Westburg should have been over Semien (I know they are both primary 3B, but either could play 2B for a couple innings) and Kimbrel of Jansen over Holmes. 
    • Must be fWAR because Westburg has 2.8 rWAR to Semien’s 2.3. And he’s only played 5 less games than Semien. 
    • Could probably get a Buddy Groom type arm.
    • Marcus Semien - .673 OPS 91 OPS+ Ramon Urias - .686 OPS 99 OPS+   (Yes I'm aware Simien has played more and has higher WAR.  Just found this interesting)
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...