Jump to content

Is now the time to rebuild?


OrioleLochRaven

Recommended Posts

Posted

With the state of the AL East and the state of our current roster/contracts, is now the ideal time to rebuild? (I know this isn't a new idea, just putting it on paper)

Even with our big trade chips in tow, we are destined for the bottom of the division. Why not trade Machado now for the best package you can get? Maybe hold Britton and let him reestablish his value and trade him at the deadline.  Move Jones too if you get a representative offer.  Move Trumbo and Davis if you could pull of that miracle. Finally take the team in some direction other than purgatory.

Make the prime years of Schoop, Gausman, Mancini and Bundy your new window. Find players who will be reaching their primes with those guys and young guys like Austin Hays etc. By that time maybe we will be able to field a good team across the diamond and challenge the Yankees and Red Sox. With the resources of our rivals, it would be best to pull back now and try to accumulate talent to make a good run at them rather than continuing to put band aids on gaping wounds.

I use to be all for trying to keep Machado, but with the Yankees recent acquisition of Stanton, it's clear that our current model won't ever be successful. I think we need to take the Cubs approach and try to accumulate young talent that can move forward together. I think apathy will set in among the fanbase with another year of stop gaps, mediocre veterans and trying to grasp at a one game wildcard. The losses would mount with a youth movement, but at least we would have prospects to be excited about. There would be a definitive direction. Right now there is none.  

Posted

This has been a major topic of discussion here for months.   I think the clear majority of posters think we should be rebuilding now, but also expect that won’t happen this winter.   

Posted

I was probably one of the last holdouts (was so nice to play competent to occasionally great ball since ‘12). That said- our “window” (i.e. 2014-16) has closed- and it’s pretty darn hard to argue against a complete “tear down” at this point when you look at what that approach delivered in Kansas City, Chicago (NL) and Houston...

Posted
5 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Why would an O’s fan want a complete rebuild when we don’t sign international free agents?  It would be a disaster. Or another 14 years of losing. 

There is enough of a core and a strong enough farm system that they don't need to do a full rebuild.  Just a sell-off of all one year assets (except Jones due to 10 and 5 rights plus not having much surplus value due to his 17m salary).  If they do well in those trades and perhaps extend Gausman/Schoop the Orioles will go into 2019 with a strong young core and plenty of payroll room to add.

Posted
11 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

There is enough of a core and a strong enough farm system that they don't need to do a full rebuild.  Just a sell-off of all one year assets (except Jones due to 10 and 5 rights plus not having much surplus value due to his 17m salary).  If they do well in those trades and perhaps extend Gausman/Schoop the Orioles will go into 2019 with a strong young core and plenty of payroll room to add.

I agree with that. But that’s a tough sell to fans. “ Hey we have to trade away these guys because we can’t afford them”. “Here are shiny new extensions for Schoop, Bundy, Gausman.”  

This is why PA must keep DD as GM because he’s the only guy in baseball that can have sustained winning while dealing with all of PA’s crap. We laugh at DD’s depth signings but if we didn’t have those we would have collapsed more than just last year. The guy is a grinder as a GM. He’s accepted that this job is hard and that he’s not crying about it. 

This organization needs an infusion of SP. Teams aren’t giving that away. We can’t even get that for Machado. Our next wave of prospects are all position players and some relievers. 

A rebuild would be ugly. I see us giving it hell until the trade deadline and then maybe selling if we’re way out of it. So a mini sell off. But not until July. 

People just need to accept reality that we’re going to have to root for a team with a rotation of Liriano, Tillman and Mike Wright at the back end of it. Haha. Maybe we get Matt Harvey. 

Posted

To expound upon my previous post...

This is a solid core

C: Sisco

1B/LF/DH: Mancini

OF: Hays

2B: Schoop

SS: Beckham

SP: Gausman

SP: Bundy

RP: Givens

RP: Scott

RP: Castro

Then you just need one of Stewart, Mullins, and Santander to be an average or better regular (which I think is a very good chance).

That's a good start, and if you can add a 3B and a SP in the Britton, Machado, and Brach trades (which is extremely reasonable to expect) then you have a team that is exciting in 2019 and just a couple players away. 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

To expound upon my previous post...

This is a solid core

C: Sisco

1B/LF/DH: Mancini

OF: Hays

2B: Schoop

SS: Beckham

SP: Gausman

SP: Bundy

RP: Givens

RP: Scott

RP: Castro

Then you just need one of Stewart, Mullins, and Santander to be an average or better regular (which I think is a very good chance).

That's a good start, and if you can add a 3B and a SP in the Britton, Machado, and Brach trades (which is extremely reasonable to expect) then you have a team that is exciting in 2019 and just a couple players away. 

 

 

Totally agree. It's probably premature to add Hunter Harvey to the 2019 rotation, but it sure does put our pitching woes in a different light.

Posted
1 minute ago, mdbdotcom said:

Totally agree. It's probably premature to add Hunter Harvey to the 2019 rotation, but it sure does put our pitching woes in a different light.

They really need a pitcher to come out of relative prospect obscurity and be a solid rotation piece.  

Posted
19 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

They really need a pitcher to come out of relative prospect obscurity and be a solid rotation piece.  

That would require looking at our pitchers differently and seeing what other teams see in them; bringing the best out of the Parker Bridwell guys who languish in our system and then have at least some success elsewhere because somebody saw something we didn't see.

Posted
16 hours ago, clapdiddy said:

I agree with your premise, but I'd include Schoop in the trade mix.   He only has 2 years left here, and he may be the most valuable trade chip of all.

I agree. Only reason DD's philosophy worked was because you had a few years where the Yanks and Sox were retooling. Now that they are in good shape for the next five years, we have to change course. DD did well while they were down (with the exception of letting Miller and Cruz walk while flirting with the Jays, which cost us a year when the two giants were down.)

Posted
2 hours ago, phillyOs119 said:

To expound upon my previous post...

This is a solid core

C: Sisco

1B/LF/DH: Mancini

OF: Hays

2B: Schoop

SS: Beckham

SP: Gausman

SP: Bundy

RP: Givens

RP: Scott

RP: Castro

Then you just need one of Stewart, Mullins, and Santander to be an average or better regular (which I think is a very good chance).

That's a good start, and if you can add a 3B and a SP in the Britton, Machado, and Brach trades (which is extremely reasonable to expect) then you have a team that is exciting in 2019 and just a couple players away. 

 

 

Yup - very reasonable if you and I were running the team.  And Mountcastle will likely be knocking on the door and might even have a position he can play.     

Posted

Yes.  Better too early than too late.  With the NYY and Boston, we're a 3rd place team at best in all likelihood.  I'm keeping Gausman, Bundy, Mancini, Schoop, Beckham, Givens, Castro, and all the other usual prospects.  Everyone else is available.  I realize not everyone is likely tradable (Davis, etc.,), but I'd try and make something work.

Posted
3 hours ago, pastorfan said:

I agree. Only reason DD's philosophy worked was because you had a few years where the Yanks and Sox were retooling. Now that they are in good shape for the next five years, we have to change course. DD did well while they were down (with the exception of letting Miller and Cruz walk while flirting with the Jays, which cost us a year when the two giants were down.)

The real reason Duquette's "philosophy" worked was because the previous GM already had in place the players who would become the core of the team.

Before starting Duquette's interview this morning on the MLB network, they showed pictures of 4 Orioles who they said had been acquired by Duquette. Three of those players were Machado, Britton and Jones. They were all with the O's before Duquette was.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • You aren't understanding what I am saying. What if you could run the same 2025 payroll as with Burnes but without the long term contract? Castillo is making $24M, only $3M less than Fried (who I think we would all have been pretty ecstatic to sign). I am saying smart spending not low spending. No, it's not the NYY model but it's not the Tampa model either, that is how we got Eflin. It is funny, the same people giving Elias heat for being rigid will be happy with one strategy and one player only and consider anything else a failure. 
    • If the owner wants to increase the revenues of the team so that he can operate from a surplus yearly, he is going to have to spend some money to generate more buzz/engagement/fanfare. The Rays model doesn’t work in terms of capturing a marketplace. Ask the Guardians or Brewers or A’s before them. What you end up with are some good but never great teams, no trophies, and no hall of fame players (because you won’t pay them). Though Ramirez from the Guardians may make it in one day. But my point is the budget ball/frugal model has a historical ceiling that leads to no fans and no rings. 
    • He doesn’t need to operate in the red just use the massive amount of money that’s there. Also his main partner Arougheti and one of his other partners Bloomberg are incredibly wealthy. Bloomberg has WAY MORE wealth than Cohen to the tune of like FIFTY BILLION more! If they are planning to run this like the mom and pop operation of John Angelos, I ask why a person in his mid 70’s would make such a decision? It’s not like he needed more money. Plus he has been known historically to give away millions through philanthropic endeavors (that is Rubenstein and Bloomberg).
    • It's an ownership group, not just Rubenstein.  The group is worth over $110 billion looked at individually.  Are you sure they fully paid for the team out of pocket? It's a new day in Birdland, but we really don't know what that looks like just yet.  Hopefully net profits will be considerably lower until at least one playoff game is won.
    • So are you mad at Rubenstein or Elias? This thread is about Elias. If we have an unlimited amount of money, sure, we can afford some guys. I am operating under the assumption that we are trying to win over the long term as a mid market team. That is what Elias has promised all along and what I believe Rubenstein has bought into. I don't expect the owner to run the franchise at a deficit although that would be fantastic if it happens.  Either way, I like the idea of higher AAV guys on shorter contracts. Then you get the same talent level as a premium FA in their prime but without the commitment and downside risk. As long as we have the pipeline of prospects then you get guys like Burnes for their 29-30 years without having to buy their 36-37 years in advance. If we can get Castillo without giving up Mayo/Basallo I would be pretty happy without that outcome. We'd be giving up 0.6 WAR vs Burnes but maintaining flexibility for the future.
    • Three points to add: -I believe those are Forbes numbers from ‘23 so last year’s OI should be much, much higher with attendance increases, TRP and other corporate income as well as the MLB fund growing about 10 points. CBT from Ohtani and friends is another $7-14m depending on eligible teams. -The other side is it’s not just DR’s money-he has partners that likely don’t want to operate that far in the red   
    • How about Rogers? He was worth two solid prospects…
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...