Jump to content

Twins Upset with Sisco Bunting


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, theocean said:

It's insane to me that every player doesn't do this. For example, I saw a replay of the Astros four-man outfield the other day: the batter hit right into it! The entire left side of the diamond was open.

The Astros only do that shift when there is no one on the base paths - so whatever batter is up in that situation should be trying to get on base and that's it.

I guess some of these guys just don't know how to bunt?

You don't even have to bunt, just hit the ball the other way.  I can't believe hitters are that stubborn and will hit the ball into the shift no matter what. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 232
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

They said Williams had only three infield hits when he hit .406. Probably not bunts. Also sacrifice flies where counted as at bats back then.

They changed the sacrifice rules quite a lot in the pre-1950 era.  Some years they lumped in sac hits and flies, some years a sac fly was an at bat.  I think there were some years where any time any runner advanced on a fly ball you got credit for a sacrifice.  Good SABR article here. It appears the current rule stuck in both leagues starting in 1955.

Also, you get some weird religious cult kind of results when you type "history of sacrifice rule" into Google.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

How often did Mantle, or Mays, or Frank Howard or Boog Powell bunt?  I know Ruth bunted some, but he came up in the deadball era, where it would take 40 or 50 sac hits to lead the league.

The large majority of bunts over the last century have been sacrifices.  When people starting doing the math and realizing that position players sacrificing was overwhelmingly counterproductive the main reason to bunt went away.  The deadball era, say 1890-1920, is the only time we've seen good batters regularly bunting.  It's only been six or eight years since the shifts really took hold, and baseball changes glacially.  If it turns out to make sense it'll come back.

Brett Butler
Maury Wills
Rod Carew
Ichiro
Juan Pierre

All excellent hitters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2018/04/the-sisco-bunting-controversy-and-other-notes-off-first-series.html

I agree with every bit of Roch's commentary on the issue. Why is a shift not against the unwritten rules but bunting away from it isn't? I felt like it was one of the few things we did right yesterday. I hope Davis was watching.

What a load of crap. Twins won two of three. They whine about a bunt? That's baseball you whiney ass babies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Il BuonO said:

Molitor needs to explain to Dozier that one-hitters aren’t a thing. Certainly not something you spout off about because you didn’t like your opponents tactics. 

If there was a no hitter I can understand how I might be bothered if someone were trying to  bunt (against a regular defense) to get the first hit. But if you’re shifting and the hitter makes a choice to beat it, you’ve got nothing to complain about.

A one hitter? That’s laughable. I’ve never heard another player refer to his team and pitcher working on a one hitter. 

Yeah, what’s the clubhouse rule of decorum for one-hitters. Inquiring minds want to know. Can’t be silence, as that’s reserved for no-hitters and perfect games. Only verbs? Adverbs? Onomatopia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, theocean said:

It's insane to me that every player doesn't do this. For example, I saw a replay of the Astros four-man outfield the other day: the batter hit right into it! The entire left side of the diamond was open.

The Astros only do that shift when there is no one on the base paths - so whatever batter is up in that situation should be trying to get on base and that's it.

I guess some of these guys just don't know how to bunt?

Maybe that's part of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

Brett Butler
Maury Wills
Rod Carew
Ichiro
Juan Pierre

All excellent hitters.

So I obviously need to be more minutely precise. In 1909 Honus Wagner was the best hitter and player in baseball and sacrificed 27 times. If Mike Trout sacrifice bunts 10 times this year I'll eat an Oriole pennant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

You don't even have to bunt, just hit the ball the other way.  I can't believe hitters are that stubborn and will hit the ball into the shift no matter what. 

Take something you do every day without thinking, then do it a very different way with everyone watching. Like next time you give a presentation at work in front of a huge audience and your bosses, work the mouse and pointer and everything left-handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Take something you do every day without thinking, then do it a very different way with everyone watching. Like next time you give a presentation at work in front of a huge audience and your bosses, work the mouse and pointer and everything left-handed.

Funny you mentioned the left-handed thing. To this day, I eat left-handed because of Eddie Murray. I read somewhere when I was a kid and during his playing days  that he was given the advice to do everyday things like use a fork, shave or draw with his left hand to increase his overall dexterity for switch-hitting. I think this was when he was first learning to switch-hit.I believe it actually works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, NashLumber said:

Yeah, what’s the clubhouse rule of decorum for one-hitters. Inquiring minds want to know. Can’t be silence, as that’s reserved for no-hitters and perfect games. Only verbs? Adverbs? Onomatopia?

Always assume alliteration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

How often did Mantle, or Mays, or Frank Howard or Boog Powell bunt?  

I don’t know about those guys, but I remember Frank Robinson bunted one time in the early seventies and it was reported in the paper as his first sac bunt in 12-13 years or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I admit I got baited by the thread title a bit and popped off before actually listening to the thing.  It doesn't really change that I've always been concerned about Cal being part of the ownership group, but I was definitely hasty to be like "SEE??". Anyway, I've got my eye on Cal. The guy just rubs me the wrong way. But hopefully nothing much to see here, or in the future. 
    • Meanwhile, I have a question about Mayo’s defense.  Everybody implies that it’s dreadful. I guess I can understand that he’s not Manny or Brooks, but how bad is it? Are we hoping he’s at least as good as George Brett, about whom someone once said,(paraphrasing), “his defense is so bad it’s like he carries his bat to the base instead of his glove.“? I love defense, and I see absolutely no reason to move Westburg away. if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. It seems far more advisable to plunk Mayo at first and do something with the guys we currently have there?  
    • I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  
    • You know, for $24 a year, a measly lousy 24 bucks a year, you can edit your comment. And you can also support @Tony-OHwho has done more work online to create an Orioles environment than literally anybody else in the entire Internet universe.
    • I think there see plenty of guys who will stay with a contending team they like if the money is close.   But Burnes clearly intends to test the market.   No significant home team discount is coming, and it just takes one team to offer something crazy to knock us out of the picture unless we’re just being stupid. 
    • When Mateo is hitting well, he really makes you wonder why he can’t do it all the time.   He looks really balanced at the plate, he uses all fields, etc.  He doesn’t look like a bad hitter who happens to be on a heater.   But that’s what his track record shows he is, until proven otherwise.  I remember that Fangraphs article last year about how Mateo had changed his approach and the improvement seemed real.  Well, no it wasn’t.  But maybe his issues are more psychological than physical?   He’s just a guy who when he slumps, quickly loses confidence and starts pressing and makes it worse?   I don’t know.    As to your point about OBP: in 2024, a .299 OBP is below average but I might not say it blows.  The MLB average is back down to .312 after a spike last year after the rule changes.  Of 312 players with 80+ PA, Mateo’s .299 ranks 191st, or 39th percentile.   Honestly, in this environment, if Mateo could stay at .299 OBP he’d be a very credible player.   But he’s a .272 career OPS guy who’d been at .267 the last two years, so I’m not expecting he’ll be able to stay at .299.   I’ll enjoy it while he’s hot though.   And he is playing a mean 2B.   Took him a couple of weeks to settle in there, but he’s looked great for the last month.    
    • I broached the experiment of Holliday in CF some months ago.  It seems to be something that could make sense.  I still expect he'll be our 2B moving forward, but having such versatility is never a bad thing.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...