Jump to content

Hyde's Decisions 2019


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

What we saw tonight was a team thinking rationally and realizing over-using a guy on his first start of the season would be an unforgivable sin.  It's a 162 season, and we have ZERO starting pitching depth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 494
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Satyr3206 said:

And that's why I hate pitch counts. And so do a lot of guys that pitched in the ML.

I agree that pitch counts can often be arbitrary, if a guy is prepared for 120-140 pitches and their body can handle it, they should be allowed to go that long once they've built up to it. I also don't think everyone should be on the same pitch count, some dudes are fast twitch and they can't handle 60 pitches at any kind of effort level before they start to lose the ability to hold their mechanics. 

Pitch counts should be personal and change depending on the time of year, the pitcher, and amount of rest. I think that's what happened here, the competitor always wants to compete, it's the manager's job to save the player from himself.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

To me, it was how he looked that inning.    Fastball down 2 mph and the hitter smacks a screaming liner that happens to find a glove.   He missed his spot on 1-2 pitches in that at bat.   

Just heard Hyde, who didn’t really cite any of this.   Was really a pitch count thing early in the season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

70 pitches. 

 

Awful awful awful decision. If you think otherwise than you just like to play contrarian and get people bent out of shape like Frobby & Corn. I doubt either of them actually think that, they just enjoy the reaction.

He had 83 pitches he threw 42 on Thursday that is 125 pitches total in a time through.  There Is not a manager in baseball that lets him finish the game.  Some may have let him finish 7th and that Is the only real debate.  Going the entire game is not even a debate with anyone with knowledge of the game.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, McLovin said:

The last thing this team needs is to put stats and individual milestones ahead of the team and organization.

Hess pitched 2 innings 3 days ago. If he gets hurt, what do they do? I mean their 5th “starter” is a 2 inning reliever as it is already. They can’t afford to lose Hess. 

Can’t afford to lose Hess? Don’t you work for a board that said Hess is nothing more than a long guy at best? Funny to hear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dempsey is so full of it.  Saying blanket sweeping commemtbthat pitchers “never come back the same after throwing no hitters”...Good grief...Palmer threw his in 1969...had pretty good career after it....Nolan threw four...had pretty good career after each one...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

The game means nothing.

Nothing.

Your team is going to be epic bad. There is a bright light. His pitch count is low. It isn’t the playoffs.You let the kid pitch.

That is all there really is to this: a really awful decision.

You are right, the game means nothing, and the decision to pull him had nothing to do with trying to win this game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rene88 said:

Can’t afford to lose Hess? Don’t you work for a board that said Hess is nothing more than a long guy at best? Funny to hear. 

Hess might not be highly regarded, but this franchise needs all the arms it can get right now.

Do you have more emotions?  Let it all out man, let it all out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Traded for Bradish, traded for Irvin, traded for Burnes, traded for Flaherty, list can go on.
    • Pablo Sandoval was pretty good for a five or six year stretch. Prince Fielder was a fat slob as was his dad. John Kruk was not  remotely athletic and had a good career. Surprisingly, Andruw Jones was not what I would consider an elite athlete but is probably the best defensive centerfielder of the last 30 years. No, being an elite athlete is not required to be a good baseball player. 
    • I wonder what your scouting report of Bobby Witt Jr was in 2022.
    • I think they are trying to tune the robo ump to more closely match the called MLB zone.  The AAA robo ump zone isn't 100% accurate to the rulebook zone, and while the called MLB zone isn't either, it's quite a bit closer.  Specifically balls fading out of the zone are more likely to be adjudged balls by the robo-ump because they're only checking pitch location on a plane at the midpoint of home plate, so for example, a curveball that clips the front of the zone, then drops below it when crossing the midpoint of home plate, would be called a ball by the current robo-ump, but is a strike by the rulebook.
    • Perhaps people shouldn't get personal with you, but you do bring it on yourself. You say outlandish things, presumably to troll, get called on them and then double, triple, quadruple, etc down until people take shots at you.
    • ??? The only sports where people peak younger than 20 is stuff like womens gymnastics and figure skating, where women have to delay puberty in order to maintain a body type ideal for the sport.  Nearly every other sport's athletes  peak between 22-27.
    • Ok several of you want to compare JH to Gunnar.  I am happy to do so: JH is 20 years old and has a .909 OPS at AAA after putting up a .941 OPS as a 19 year old at four levels. As a 20 year old Gunnar had a .826 OPS across three levels, .944 at A, .775 at A+ and .561 at AA (5 games) Even at 21 Gunnar went back to AA for almost half a season and his OPS at AA was .894 I am not saying JH will be as good as Gunnar but people saying we should trade for some pitcher we could have for a year or two have lost touch with common sense.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...