Jump to content

Give Andrelton Simmons a 3 year deal


ofan239

Recommended Posts

Or two years with an option . I have to preface this with saying I don’t know a whole lot about Andrelton Simmons other than he plays gold glove hall of fame caliber defense and I know we have some middle infielders coming up but this is why I do it 

- those that are playing SS right now in the system are at least a couple of years away. 
 

- there is no guarantee that those prospects that could play shortstop in mlb will be able to in mlb - Henderson , west burg and Vavra are all bigger guys and could necessitate a move to another position 

- we have a lot of pitchers coming up- young pitchers that will need a solid defense up the middle - what better way to shore that up with a gold glove winner at 2nd (Sanchez ) and short . 
 

- as much as the shift in instituted now we need someone athletic enough to be able to adapt and cover ground there - not a Ruiz , not an Alberto, not a Villar .someone that’s sound . - for our pitchers and the defense 

if it’s between us and another team I say we bite the bullet for the reasons above and spend on this one . There is another really good class of shortstop free agents next year and we won’t likely spend on those because those will likely be  more expensive . I think you go in this year even though we are rebuilding - but I think this helps out the rebuild .  Otherwise just sign Villar and be done with it . NO to GALVIS 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It says a lot to me that the Angels would let him walk and trade for Iglesias.

Maybe saving Bauer pennies.   I enjoyed the trope new to me recently Arte Moreno either gives out $300M or zero.

I like to imagine Elias has a weekly recurring in his Outlook calendar to ping Andrelton's agent about whether our SUPER MAX $5M mid-level exception can do it.   Until A's/Phillies/Reds employ the three good ones, or a position change is accepted, I'm keeping the Outlook Rule filing emails from Freddy Galvis's agent out of my Inbox.   With the chinks in the armor, have to think 2021's contenders lean Semien/Didi.

We could go crazy for Profar/Andrelton/Schoop and really try to establish the brand in the Netherlands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

Maybe saving Bauer pennies.   I enjoyed the trope new to me recently Arte Moreno either gives out $300M or zero.

I like to imagine Elias has a weekly recurring in his Outlook calendar to ping Andrelton's agent about whether our SUPER MAX $5M mid-level exception can do it.   Until A's/Phillies/Reds employ the three good ones, or a position change is accepted, I'm keeping the Outlook Rule filing emails from Freddy Galvis's agent out of my Inbox.   With the chinks in the armor, have to think 2021's contenders lean Semien/Didi.

We could go crazy for Profar/Andrelton/Schoop and really try to establish the brand in the Netherlands.

Crazy would be bringing Ponson back as a pitching coach.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would depend on the money involved, but I doubt we can afford what it would take. And really, a 2 year contract similar to Iglesias is about all I could see. A truly outstanding SS in his prime, not sure he can stay healthy enough to be a difference maker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think the goal is to win this year or even the next. The goal is to give reps to our young guys, bolster our system, and bide our time. We are building toward a very large window of success and should put all our efforts toward that end. Come three years from now, we will be firing on all cylinders. Then and only then should we be looking to make a splash in free agency. Besides, at that point we will only be looking to make our complete team that much more dominant and will have a ton more to sell top flight acquisitions who would want to win immediately. We will lose a lot of games these next two years but at the same time it is incredibly exciting as we will see the future grow and mature before our eyes.

 

patience is a virtue.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • To put things into context, Jackson has so far an .898 OPS at AAA in his age 20 season (he started the season at over 1.000 before his call-up, I don't think it's a stretch to suggest that going up and struggling might've had some effect on his numbers afterwards).  Mayo at age 20 had a .782 OPS between A+ and AA. Basallo will turn 20 in 60 days. He's about 2/3 of a year younger than Holliday. In his age 19 season he currently has an .810 OPS. In Jackson's age 19 season he had a .928 OPS at Bowie before moving on to AAA where he OPS'd .796 in 91 PA.  Unless there is important statistic evidence suggesting that ISO at the major league level is a more important indicator of future success than say wRC+ or OPS (and if this were true, we should be encouraged by the fact that Jackson has gone from a .176 ISO--.133 at the same level--to .196 ISO from age 19 to 20) I don't really see any argument for putting Basallo or Mayo above them. With all due respect--because I think you are putting forth some interesting points and almost convinced me before I did this little exercise--I think you are likely subconsciously being affected too strongly by Jackson's 36 PA at the ML level. 
    • Good luck. Tomorrow is still TBD it appears.
    • It seems to make little sense to go to a 6 man rotation given how thin the bullpen already is. I certainly hope that is not the plan. Yes we can “get by” against the struggling Braves using Tate and Akin in high leverage situations. But that odds of using such mid relievers against good opponents (who can hit) is not very likely.
    • Yeah and at this point we dont have to use him in every save situation.  The other guys have been very good and just looking at the numbers it is gonna be almost impossible not to make the playoffs.  The division would be great but if the Yanks win 105+ games you just tip your cap to them as they are playing unreal baseball so far and continue to stay healthy.   There are only 6 team in the AL over .500 with Boston at .500.  Assuming 90 wins makes the playoffs(which i think will be less then that actually this year way the top teams are playing all we have to do is go 45-50  the rest of the way to make the playoffs.  The Red Sox and any other team would have to play  above .600 baseball to get to 90 wins.  If we don't get to 90 wins a whole lot more then having to use a different guy in a save situation here and there to give him rest.  
    • Hate to say it but that is how I have felt for a while now.  I just don't see the athleticism or the special qualities in him that you do with a Gunnar or a Judge.  Things that make them standout from the rest.   He looks just like a regular player.  I see a young looking, not very athletic, good baseball player for his age. The best prospect in baseball?   I have doubts on that.    And that is not to say he won't be a really good player in the future.  I just don't see superstar.
    • God, I hate flawed baseball players.  They're the absolute worst.
    • People can’t see the forest through the trees.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...